301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28467118)
1. Reliability and accuracy of three imaging software packages used for 3D analysis of the upper airway on cone beam computed tomography images.
Chen H; van Eijnatten M; Wolff J; de Lange J; van der Stelt PF; Lobbezoo F; Aarab G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Aug; 46(6):20170043. PubMed ID: 28467118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of three-dimensional measurements of the upper airway on cone beam computed tomography images.
Chen H; Aarab G; Parsa A; de Lange J; van der Stelt PF; Lobbezoo F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Jul; 122(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 27260280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of MDCT and CBCT in three-dimensional evaluation of the oropharynx morphology.
Chen H; van Eijnatten M; Aarab G; Forouzanfar T; de Lange J; van der Stelt P; Lobbezoo F; Wolff J
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 40(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 28453722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and accuracy of a semi-automatic segmentation protocol of the nasal cavity using cone beam computed tomography in patients with sleep apnea.
Chen H; Lv T; Luo Q; Li L; Wang Q; Li Y; Zhou D; Emami E; Schmittbuhl M; van der Stelt P; Huynh N
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Nov; 27(11):6813-6821. PubMed ID: 37796336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imaging software accuracy for 3-dimensional analysis of the upper airway.
Weissheimer A; Menezes LM; Sameshima GT; Enciso R; Pham J; Grauer D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Dec; 142(6):801-13. PubMed ID: 23195366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing different software packages for measuring the oropharynx and minimum cross-sectional area.
ElShebiny T; Morcos S; El H; Palomo JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Feb; 161(2):228-237.e32. PubMed ID: 34563428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vertical bone measurements from cone beam computed tomography images using different software packages.
Vasconcelos TV; Neves FS; Moraes LA; Freitas DQ
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography definition of the anatomical subregions of the upper airway: a validation study.
Guijarro-Martínez R; Swennen GR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 42(9):1140-9. PubMed ID: 23623785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of a method to conduct upper airway analysis in cone-beam computed tomography.
Souza KR; Oltramari-Navarro PV; Navarro Rde L; Conti AC; Almeida MR
Braz Oral Res; 2013; 27(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 23306626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of upper airway linear, area, and volumetric measurements in cone-beam computed tomography.
Mattos CT; Cruz CV; da Matta TC; Pereira Lde A; Solon-de-Mello Pde A; Ruellas AC; Sant'anna EF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 24485733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of upper airway assessment using CBCT.
Zimmerman JN; Vora SR; Pliska BT
Eur J Orthod; 2019 Jan; 41(1):101-108. PubMed ID: 30184085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computerized measurement of the location and value of the minimum sagittal linear dimension of the upper airway on reconstructed lateral cephalograms compared with 3-dimensional values.
Alwadei AH; Galang-Boquiren MTS; Kusnoto B; Costa Viana MG; Lin EY; Obrez A; Evans CA; Masoud AI
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Dec; 154(6):780-787. PubMed ID: 30477775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images.
Lagravère MO; Carey J; Toogood RW; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):112-6. PubMed ID: 18617110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of linear measurements on 3D surface models using CBCT data segmentation obtained by automatic standard pre-set thresholds in two segmentation software programs: an in vitro study.
Poleti ML; Fernandes TM; Pagin O; Moretti MR; Rubira-Bullen IR
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jan; 20(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 25963719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography nasopharyngeal volumetric and area measurements as determined by commercial software against nasopharyngoscopy-supported diagnosis of adenoid hypertrophy.
Pachêco-Pereira C; Alsufyani N; Major M; Palomino-Gómez S; Pereira JR; Flores-Mir C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jul; 152(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 28651774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and validity of two software systems used to measure the pharyngeal airway space in three-dimensional analysis.
Torres HM; Evangelista K; Torres EM; Estrela C; Leite AF; Valladares-Neto J; Silva MAG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 May; 49(5):602-613. PubMed ID: 31564477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The reliability of computed tomography (CT) values and dimensional measurements of the oropharyngeal region using cone beam CT: comparison with multidetector CT.
Yamashina A; Tanimoto K; Sutthiprapaporn P; Hayakawa Y
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):245-51. PubMed ID: 18606745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring the airway in 3 dimensions: a reliability and accuracy study.
El H; Palomo JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4 Suppl):S50.e1-9; discussion S50-2. PubMed ID: 20381759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Linear Measurement Accuracy of Eight Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanners.
Kosalagood P; Silkosessak OC; Pittayapat P; Pisarnturakit P; Pauwels R; Jacobs R
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1217-27. PubMed ID: 24673845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
