210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28467761)
1. Review of Robotic Surgery in Gynecology-The Future Is Here.
Lauterbach R; Matanes E; Lowenstein L
Rambam Maimonides Med J; 2017 Apr; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 28467761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Gala RB; Margulies R; Steinberg A; Murphy M; Lukban J; Jeppson P; Aschkenazi S; Olivera C; South M; Lowenstein L; Schaffer J; Balk EM; Sung V;
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 24295923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: A systematic review.
Matanes E; Lauterbach R; Boulus S; Amit A; Lowenstein L
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Dec; 231():1-7. PubMed ID: 30317138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery.
Truong M; Kim JH; Scheib S; Patzkowsky K
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 28(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 27362711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature.
Cho JE; Shamshirsaz AH; Nezhat C; Nezhat C; Nezhat F
Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Apr; 62(2):137-67. PubMed ID: 20502426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility and Learning Curve of Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology.
Buckley de Meritens A; Kim J; Dinkelspiel H; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo T; Holcomb KM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):323-328. PubMed ID: 27867048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic review.
Weinberg L; Rao S; Escobar PF
Obstet Gynecol Int; 2011; 2011():852061. PubMed ID: 22190948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery.
Rosenblum N
Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 22647648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Robotic surgery in gynecology].
Csorba R
Orv Hetil; 2012 Jun; 153(25):967-72. PubMed ID: 22714030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An analysis of the impact of previous laparoscopic hysterectomy experience on the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy.
Eddib A; Jain N; Aalto M; Hughes S; Eswar A; Erk M; Michalik C; Krovi V; Singhal P
J Robot Surg; 2013 Sep; 7(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 27000926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic surgery in gynecology.
Sinha R; Sanjay M; Rupa B; Kumari S
J Minim Access Surg; 2015; 11(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 25598600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multi-Institutional Trends in Gynecological Robotic Surgery in India: A Real-World Scenario.
Sinha R; Jain V; Sp S; Saha SC; Sunkavalli C; Kiran L; Shylasree TS; Pandey K; Mohanty GS
Cureus; 2023 Mar; 15(3):e36564. PubMed ID: 37095794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The benefits and challenges of robotic-assisted hysterectomy.
Smorgick N; As-Sanie S
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Aug; 26(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 24914631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic vs. non-robotic approaches.
Martino MA; Berger EA; McFetridge JT; Shubella J; Gosciniak G; Wejkszner T; Kainz GF; Patriarco J; Thomas MB; Boulay R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):389-93. PubMed ID: 24513969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons.
Choussein S; Srouji SS; Farland LV; Wietsma A; Missmer SA; Hollis M; Yu RN; Pozner CN; Gargiulo AR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28734971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Innovation in endocrine surgery: robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Meta-analysis and systematic literature review.
Agrusa A; Romano G; Navarra G; Conzo G; Pantuso G; Buono GD; Citarrella R; Galia M; Monte AL; Cucinella G; Gulotta G
Oncotarget; 2017 Nov; 8(60):102392-102400. PubMed ID: 29254254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative analysis of vaginal versus robotic-assisted hysterectomy for benign indications.
Jacome EG; Hebert AE; Christian F
J Robot Surg; 2013 Mar; 7(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 27000891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
