These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28468140)

  • 1. Microtia and Social Media: Patient Versus Physician Perspective of Quality of Information.
    Sepehripour S; McDermott AL; Lloyd MS
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 May; 28(3):643-645. PubMed ID: 28468140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Empowerment of Parents of Children With Craniosynostosis by Objective Scoring of Patient Information Websites.
    Lloyd MS; Lafferty K; Horton J; Noons P; Dover S; Evans M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 27(4):874-5. PubMed ID: 27192636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Readability and quality assessment of websites related to microtia and aural atresia.
    Alamoudi U; Hong P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Feb; 79(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 25554575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy.
    Corcelles R; Daigle CR; Talamas HR; Brethauer SA; Schauer PR
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2015; 11(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 25604832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.
    Donnally CJ; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Roth ES; Barker GP; McCormick JR; Rush AJ; Lebwohl NH
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2081-2090. PubMed ID: 29709552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The quality of internet-sourced information for patients with chronic pain is poor.
    Corcoran TB; Haigh F; Seabrook A; Schug SA
    Clin J Pain; 2009 Sep; 25(7):617-23. PubMed ID: 19692804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What cancer patients find in the internet: the visibility of evidence-based patient information - analysis of information on German websites.
    Liebl P; Seilacher E; Koester MJ; Stellamanns J; Zell J; Hübner J
    Oncol Res Treat; 2015; 38(5):212-8. PubMed ID: 25966768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthognathic surgery: is patient information on the Internet valid?
    Aldairy T; Laverick S; McIntyre GT
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Aug; 34(4):466-9. PubMed ID: 21459834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perthes Disease: The Quality and Reliability of Information on the Internet.
    Nassiri M; Bruce-Brand RA; O'Neill F; Chenouri S; Curtin P
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2015; 35(5):530-5. PubMed ID: 25254387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The design and content of orthodontic practise websites in the UK is suboptimal and does not correlate with search ranking.
    Patel A; Cobourne MT
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Aug; 37(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 25488944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the quality of websites offering information on female hypoactive sexual desire disorder.
    Touchet BK; Warnock JK; Yates WR; Wilkins KM
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2007; 33(4):329-42. PubMed ID: 17541851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding consumer health information-seeking behavior from the perspective of the risk perception attitude framework and social support in mobile social media websites.
    Deng Z; Liu S
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Sep; 105():98-109. PubMed ID: 28750916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An Evaluation and Ranking of Children's Hospital Websites in the United States.
    Huerta TR; Walker DM; Ford EW
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Aug; 18(8):e228. PubMed ID: 27549074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How evidence-based is the information on the internet about nausea and vomiting of pregnancy?
    Sacks S; Abenhaim HA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Aug; 35(8):697-703. PubMed ID: 24007704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated assessment of the quality of depression websites.
    Griffiths KM; Tang TT; Hawking D; Christensen H
    J Med Internet Res; 2005 Dec; 7(5):e59. PubMed ID: 16403723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physician and Patient Views on Public Physician Rating Websites: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Holliday AM; Kachalia A; Meyer GS; Sequist TD
    J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Jun; 32(6):626-631. PubMed ID: 28150098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surfing for mouth guards: assessing quality of online information.
    Magunacelaya MB; Glendor U
    Dent Traumatol; 2011 Oct; 27(5):334-43. PubMed ID: 21635690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scoliosis and the Social Media: Facebook as a Means of Information Exchange.
    Ng JP; Tarazi N; Byrne DP; Baker JF; McCabe JP
    Spine Deform; 2017 Mar; 5(2):102-108. PubMed ID: 28259261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Content, Quality, and Assessment Tools of Physician-Rating Websites in 12 Countries: Quantitative Analysis.
    Rothenfluh F; Schulz PJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jun; 20(6):e212. PubMed ID: 29903704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Side effects of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients : The Internet as an information source.
    Janssen S; Käsmann L; Fahlbusch FB; Rades D; Vordermark D
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2018 Feb; 194(2):136-142. PubMed ID: 28856383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.