BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28469030)

  • 1. Manipulation of feeding regime alters sexual dimorphism for lifespan and reduces sexual conflict in
    Duxbury EML; Rostant WG; Chapman T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 May; 284(1854):. PubMed ID: 28469030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interactions between genotype and sexual conflict environment influence transgenerational fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Brommer JE; Fricke C; Edward DA; Chapman T
    Evolution; 2012 Feb; 66(2):517-31. PubMed ID: 22276545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Female resistance to male harm evolves in response to manipulation of sexual conflict.
    Wigby S; Chapman T
    Evolution; 2004 May; 58(5):1028-37. PubMed ID: 15212383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evolution of mate-harm, longevity and behaviour in male fruit flies subjected to different levels of interlocus conflict.
    Nandy B; Gupta V; Sen S; Udaykumar N; Samant MA; Ali SZ; Prasad NG
    BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Sep; 13():212. PubMed ID: 24073883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex and genotype effects on nutrient-dependent fitness landscapes in
    Camus MF; Fowler K; Piper MWD; Reuter M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Dec; 284(1869):. PubMed ID: 29263276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bateman's principle and immunity: phenotypically plastic reproductive strategies predict changes in immunological sex differences.
    McKean KA; Nunney L
    Evolution; 2005 Jul; 59(7):1510-7. PubMed ID: 16153036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual conflict and environmental change: trade-offs within and between the sexes during the evolution of desiccation resistance.
    Kwan L; Bedhomme S; Prasad NG; Chippindale AK
    J Genet; 2008 Dec; 87(4):383-94. PubMed ID: 19147928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual selection and immune function in Drosophila melanogaster.
    McKean KA; Nunney L
    Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):386-400. PubMed ID: 18070086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual conflict over remating interval is modulated by the
    Smith DT; Clarke NV; Boone JM; Fricke C; Chapman T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Mar; 284(1850):. PubMed ID: 28250180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproductive behaviour evolves rapidly when intralocus sexual conflict is removed.
    Bedhomme S; Prasad NG; Jiang PP; Chippindale AK
    PLoS One; 2008 May; 3(5):e2187. PubMed ID: 18478127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual dimorphism explains residual variance around the survival-reproduction tradeoff in lizards: Implications for sexual conflict over life-history evolution.
    Reedy AM; Evans WJ; Cox RM
    Evolution; 2019 Nov; 73(11):2324-2332. PubMed ID: 31309538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic variation in male and female reproductive characters associated with sexual conflict in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Friberg U
    Behav Genet; 2005 Jul; 35(4):455-62. PubMed ID: 15971026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genome-wide sexually antagonistic variants reveal long-standing constraints on sexual dimorphism in fruit flies.
    Ruzicka F; Hill MS; Pennell TM; Flis I; Ingleby FC; Mott R; Fowler K; Morrow EH; Reuter M
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Apr; 17(4):e3000244. PubMed ID: 31022179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Live fast die young life history in females: evolutionary trade-off between early life mating and lifespan in female Drosophila melanogaster.
    Travers LM; Garcia-Gonzalez F; Simmons LW
    Sci Rep; 2015 Oct; 5():15469. PubMed ID: 26482533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexual conflict drives male manipulation of female postmating responses in
    Hollis B; Koppik M; Wensing KU; Ruhmann H; Genzoni E; Erkosar B; Kawecki TJ; Fricke C; Keller L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Apr; 116(17):8437-8444. PubMed ID: 30962372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental evolution of female traits under different levels of intersexual conflict in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Nandy B; Gupta V; Udaykumar N; Samant MA; Sen S; Prasad NG
    Evolution; 2014 Feb; 68(2):412-25. PubMed ID: 24117169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexually antagonistic coevolution between the sex chromosomes of
    Lund-Hansen KK; Olito C; Morrow EH; Abbott JK
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(8):. PubMed ID: 33602805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid sex-specific adaptation to high temperature in
    Hsu SK; Jakšić AM; Nolte V; Lirakis M; Kofler R; Barghi N; Versace E; Schlötterer C
    Elife; 2020 Feb; 9():. PubMed ID: 32083552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No evidence that experimental manipulation of sexual conflict drives premating reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Wigby S; Chapman T
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 19(4):1033-9. PubMed ID: 16780504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evolution of sexual dimorphism in gene expression in response to a manipulation of mate competition.
    Mishra P; Rundle HD; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2024 Mar; 78(4):746-757. PubMed ID: 38270064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.