238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28469840)
1. Do the equity-efficiency preferences of the Israeli Basket Committee match those of Israeli health policy makers?
Shmueli A
Isr J Health Policy Res; 2017; 6():20. PubMed ID: 28469840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficiency and equity considerations in the preferences of health policy-makers in Israel.
Shmueli A; Golan O; Paolucci F; Mentzakis E
Isr J Health Policy Res; 2017; 6():18. PubMed ID: 28373904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decision-making criteria among national policymakers in five countries: a discrete choice experiment eliciting relative preferences for equity and efficiency.
Mirelman A; Mentzakis E; Kinter E; Paolucci F; Fordham R; Ozawa S; Ferraz M; Baltussen R; Niessen LW
Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):534-9. PubMed ID: 22583464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Decision-makers' preferences for approving new medicines in Wales: a discrete-choice experiment with assessment of external validity.
Linley WG; Hughes DA
Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Apr; 31(4):345-55. PubMed ID: 23516033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Economic evaluation of the decisions of the Israeli Public Committee for updating the National List of Health Services in 2006/2007.
Shmueli A
Value Health; 2009; 12(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 18657095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Equity and efficiency preferences of health policy makers in China--a stated preference analysis.
Paolucci F; Mentzakis E; Defechereux T; Niessen LW
Health Policy Plan; 2015 Oct; 30(8):1059-66. PubMed ID: 25500745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Equity in HTA: what doesn't get measured, gets marginalised.
Cookson R; Mirelman AJ
Isr J Health Policy Res; 2017; 6():38. PubMed ID: 28694961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Priority setting in the Austrian healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment and implications for mental health.
Mentzakis E; Paolucci F; Rubicko G
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2014 Jun; 17(2):61-73. PubMed ID: 25153094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Economic examination of the 2006/7 update of the Israeli national list of health services].
Shmueli A; Nissan-Englcin E
Harefuah; 2008 Jun; 147(6):488-92, 576. PubMed ID: 18693622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determining Criteria and Weights for Prioritizing Health Technologies Based on the Preferences of the General Population: A New Zealand Pilot Study.
Sullivan T; Hansen P
Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 28408011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dear policy maker: have you made up your mind? A discrete choice experiment among policy makers and other health professionals.
Koopmanschap MA; Stolk EA; Koolman X
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2010 Apr; 26(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20392324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Setting priorities for the adoption of health technologies on a national level -- the Israeli experience.
Shani S; Siebzehner MI; Luxenburg O; Shemer J
Health Policy; 2000 Dec; 54(3):169-85. PubMed ID: 11154787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Which health technologies should be funded? A prioritization framework based explicitly on value for money.
Golan O; Hansen P
Isr J Health Policy Res; 2012 Nov; 1(1):44. PubMed ID: 23181391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative analysis of decision maker preferences for equity/efficiency attributes in reimbursement decisions in three European countries.
Baji P; García-Goñi M; Gulácsi L; Mentzakis E; Paolucci F
Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Sep; 17(7):791-9. PubMed ID: 26296623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Choosing Video Instead of In-Clinic Consultations in Primary Care in Israel: Discrete Choice Experiment Among Key Stakeholders-Patients, Primary Care Physicians, and Policy Makers.
Chudner I; Drach-Zahavy A; Karkabi K
Value Health; 2019 Oct; 22(10):1187-1196. PubMed ID: 31563262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploring policy-makers' perspectives on disinvestment from ineffective healthcare practices.
Elshaug AG; Hiller JE; Moss JR
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18218163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is 'health equity' bad for our health? A qualitative empirical ethics study of public health policy-makers' perspectives.
Smith MJ; Thompson A; Upshur REG
Can J Public Health; 2018 Dec; 109(5-6):633-642. PubMed ID: 30465285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Priority setting for health technology adoption at the national level: Lessons learned over 25 years' experience.
Luxenburg O; Morginstin T; Myers V; Saban M; Shemer J; Wilf-Miron R
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2023 Nov; 39(1):e71. PubMed ID: 37929308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determining priority for liver transplantation: a comparison of cost per QALY and discrete choice experiment-generated public preferences.
Ratcliffe J; Buxton M; Young T; Longworth L
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2005; 4(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 16466276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Developing a decision support system to link health technology assessment (HTA) reports to the health system policies in Iran.
Yazdani S; Jadidfard MP
Health Policy Plan; 2017 May; 32(4):504-515. PubMed ID: 28025325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
