These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2846996)

  • 1. Comments on the value of the average energy expended per ion pair formed in air for a proton beam recommended by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
    Hayakawa Y; Schechtman H
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(5):778. PubMed ID: 2846996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. kQ factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in clinical proton beams.
    Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
    Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8700030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
    Araki F; Kubo HD
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental W values of low-energy protons in the alkane series from methane to pentane.
    Willems G; Grosswendt B
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Feb; 43(2):313-23. PubMed ID: 9509528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microdosimetry of proton and carbon ions.
    Liamsuwan T; Hultqvist M; Lindborg L; Uehara S; Nikjoo H
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081721. PubMed ID: 25086531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Alanine dosimetry of proton therapy beams.
    Onori S; d'Errico F; De Angelis C; Egger E; Fattibene P; Janovsky I
    Med Phys; 1997 Mar; 24(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 9089596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative Ngas measurements for a parallel plate chamber in proton, electron, and 60Co beams.
    Wu GN; Sandison GA; Bloch C
    Med Phys; 1995 Dec; 22(12):2057-63. PubMed ID: 8746711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comments on 'Investigation of the chamber correction factor (k(ch)) for the UK secondary standard ionization chamber (NE2561/NE2611) using medium energy x-rays'.
    Rosser KE
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 May; 44(5):L9. PubMed ID: 10368030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The calibration of plane parallel ionisation chambers for the measurement of absorbed dose in electron beams of low to medium energies. Part 1: the NACP chamber.
    Cross P; Freeman N
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Sep; 19(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 8936730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical implementation of AAPM TG61 protocol for kilovoltage x-ray beam dosimetry.
    Yoo S; Grimm D; Zhu R; Jursinic P; Lopez F; Rownd J; Gillin M
    Med Phys; 2002 Oct; 29(10):2269-73. PubMed ID: 12408301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A correction method for diamond detector signal dependence with proton energy.
    Fidanzio A; Azario L; De Angelis C; Pacilio M; Onori S; Kacperek A; Piermattei A
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):669-75. PubMed ID: 12033561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reference dosimetry in a scanned pulsed proton beam using ionisation chambers and a Faraday cup.
    Lorin S; Grusell E; Tilly N; Medin J; Kimstrand P; Glimelius B
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(13):3519-29. PubMed ID: 18552418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental evaluation of a MOSFET dosimeter for proton dose measurements.
    Kohno R; Nishio T; Miyagishi T; Hirano E; Hotta K; Kawashima M; Ogino T
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(23):6077-86. PubMed ID: 17110771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uncertainty of calibrations at the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories.
    Ibbott GS; Attix FH; Slowey TW; Fontenla DP; Rozenfeld M
    Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1249-54. PubMed ID: 9284248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of basic features of proton and helium ion pencil beams in water using GATE.
    Ströbele J; Schreiner T; Fuchs H; Georg D
    Z Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 22(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 22265081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consistency in reference radiotherapy dosimetry: resolution of an apparent conundrum when (60)Co is the reference quality for charged-particle and photon beams.
    Andreo P; Wulff J; Burns DT; Palmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(19):6593-621. PubMed ID: 24018471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clarification of the AAPM Task Group 21 protocol.
    Schulz RJ; Almond PR; Kutcher G; Loevinger R; Nath R; Rogers DW; Suntharalingam N; Wright KA; Kahn FM
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(5):755-9. PubMed ID: 3097466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The electron and proton, signals for biology. A prospectus for medicine based on energy flow across a balanced system or transducer, the cell; prediction of a crucial photocatalytic chain.
    ISAACS JP; LAMB JC; BREWSTER WR
    Postgrad Med; 1961 May; 29():542-7. PubMed ID: 13717929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.