These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

503 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28470408)

  • 21. [Robot-assisted surgery in the head and neck region].
    Hoffmann TK; Friedrich DT; Schuler PJ
    HNO; 2016 Sep; 64(9):658-66. PubMed ID: 27510228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tactile-Based Pantomime Grasping: Knowledge of Results is Not Enough to Support an Absolute Calibration.
    Heath M; Chan J; Davarpanah Jazi S
    J Mot Behav; 2019; 51(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 29236589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perception-based 3D tactile rendering from a single image for human skin examinations by dynamic touch.
    Kim K; Lee S
    Skin Res Technol; 2015 May; 21(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 25087469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems.
    Kitagawa M; Dokko D; Okamura AM; Yuh DD
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Jan; 129(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 15632837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Effect of Kinesthetic and Artificial Tactile Noise and Variability on Stiffness Perception.
    Kossowsky H; Farajian M; Nisky I
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2022; 15(2):351-362. PubMed ID: 35271449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Toward Whole-Hand Kinesthetic Feedback: A Survey of Force Feedback Gloves.
    Wang D; Song M; Naqash A; Zheng Y; Xu W; Zhang Y
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2019; 12(2):189-204. PubMed ID: 30452380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Utility of the Highly Articulated Flex Robotic System for Head and Neck Procedures: A Cadaveric Study.
    Newsome H; Mandapathil M; Koh YW; Duvvuri U
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Sep; 125(9):758-63. PubMed ID: 27287677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of haptic feedback quality on the performance of teleoperated assembly tasks.
    Wildenbeest JG; Abbink DA; Heemskerk CJ; van der Helm FC; Boessenkool H
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2013; 6(2):242-52. PubMed ID: 24808307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Haptics and the heart: Force and tactile feedback system for cardiovascular interventions.
    Schecter S; Lin W; Gopal A; Fan R; Rashba E
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Sep; 19(6S):36-40. PubMed ID: 30017728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Integration of force reflection with tactile sensing for minimally invasive robotics-assisted tumor localization.
    Talasaz A; Patel RV
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2013; 6(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 24808305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Recent advances in robot-assisted head and neck surgery.
    Friedrich DT; Scheithauer MO; Greve J; Hoffmann TK; Schuler PJ
    Int J Med Robot; 2017 Jun; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 26990024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of Skin Deformation Tactile Feedback for Teleoperated Surgical Tasks.
    Quek ZF; Provancher WR; Okamura AM
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2019; 12(2):102-113. PubMed ID: 30281480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Manual preferences for visually- and haptically-guided grasping.
    Stone KD; Gonzalez CL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Sep; 160():1-10. PubMed ID: 26134414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Tactile Feedback in Upper Limb Prosthetics: A Pilot Study on Trans-Radial Amputees Comparing Different Haptic Modalities.
    Barontini F; Obermeier A; Catalano MG; Fani S; Grioli G; Bianchi M; Bicchi A; Jakubowitz E
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2023; 16(4):760-769. PubMed ID: 37801383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Haptic feedback in the da Vinci Research Kit (dVRK): A user study based on grasping, palpation, and incision tasks.
    Saracino A; Deguet A; Staderini F; Boushaki MN; Cianchi F; Menciassi A; Sinibaldi E
    Int J Med Robot; 2019 Aug; 15(4):e1999. PubMed ID: 30970387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fluidic Haptic Interface for Mechano-Tactile Feedback.
    Shi G; Palombi A; Lim Z; Astolfi A; Burani A; Campagnini S; Loizzo FGC; Preti ML; Vargas AM; Peperoni E; Oddo CM; Li M; Hardwicke J; Venus M; Homer-Vanniasinkam S; Wurdemann HA
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2020; 13(1):204-210. PubMed ID: 32012023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Role of Visual and Haptic Feedback During Dynamically Coupled Bimanual Manipulation.
    Contu S; Hughes CM; Masia L
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2016; 9(4):536-547. PubMed ID: 27655023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of Auditory Feedback on Tactile Intensity Perception in a Touchscreen Application.
    Won HI; Altinsoy ME
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2020; 13(2):343-353. PubMed ID: 31634144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of haptic feedback for the integration of intentions in shared task execution.
    Groten R; Feth D; Klatzky RL; Peer A
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2013; 6(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 24808271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of Haptic Feedback on Bimanually Teleoperated Laparoscopy for Endometriosis Surgery.
    Diez SP; Borghesan G; Joyeux L; Meuleman C; Deprest J; Stoyanov D; Ourselin S; Vercauteren T; Reynaerts D; Poorten EBV
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2019 May; 66(5):1207-1221. PubMed ID: 30235114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.