These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28470554)

  • 1. Confident failures: Lapses of working memory reveal a metacognitive blind spot.
    Adam KCS; Vogel EK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1506-1523. PubMed ID: 28470554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Adam KC; Mance I; Fukuda K; Vogel EK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 27(8):1601-16. PubMed ID: 25811710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metacognition in working memory: Confidence judgments during an n-back task.
    Conte N; Fairfield B; Padulo C; Pelegrina S
    Conscious Cogn; 2023 May; 111():103522. PubMed ID: 37087901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments.
    Fitzgerald LM; Arvaneh M; Dockree PM
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():264-277. PubMed ID: 28222381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Introspection during short-term memory scanning.
    Reyes G; Sackur J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Oct; 71(10):2088-2100. PubMed ID: 30226428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of the number of changes in a display in working memory.
    Cowan N; Hardman K; Saults JS; Blume CL; Clark KM; Sunday MA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Feb; 42(2):169-85. PubMed ID: 26375783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of time on task on mind wandering and visual working memory.
    Krimsky M; Forster DE; Llabre MM; Jha AP
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():84-90. PubMed ID: 28865286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural correlates of metacognitive ability and of feeling confident: a large-scale fMRI study.
    Molenberghs P; Trautwein FM; Böckler A; Singer T; Kanske P
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 11(12):1942-1951. PubMed ID: 27445213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing failures of working memory with performance feedback.
    Adam KC; Vogel EK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1520-1527. PubMed ID: 26961905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimistic metacognitive judgments predict poor performance in relatively complex visual tasks.
    Levin DT; Biswas G; Lappin JS; Rushdy M; Seiffert AE
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 Sep; 74():102781. PubMed ID: 31319238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metamemory viewed through the judgment lens.
    Bröder A; Undorf M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jun; 197():153-165. PubMed ID: 31158737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual differences in higher-level cognitive abilities do not predict overconfidence in complex task performance.
    Visser TAW; Bender AD; Bowden VK; Black SC; Greenwell-Barnden J; Loft S; Lipp OV
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 Sep; 74():102777. PubMed ID: 31271910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ensemble coding remains accurate under object and spatial visual working memory load.
    Epstein ML; Emmanouil TA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2088-2097. PubMed ID: 28600677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pupillometry tracks fluctuations in working memory performance.
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Feb; 81(2):407-419. PubMed ID: 30411207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal Expectations Guide Dynamic Prioritization in Visual Working Memory through Attenuated α Oscillations.
    van Ede F; Niklaus M; Nobre AC
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 37(2):437-445. PubMed ID: 28077721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are errors detected before they occur? Early error sensations revealed by metacognitive judgments on the timing of error awareness.
    Di Gregorio F; Maier ME; Steinhauser M
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 Jan; 77():102857. PubMed ID: 31837572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Working memory representations persist in the face of unexpected task alterations.
    Swan G; Wyble B; Chen H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1408-1414. PubMed ID: 28386882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning by heart-the relationship between resting vagal tone and metacognitive judgments: a pilot study.
    Meessen J; Sütterlin S; Gauggel S; Forkmann T
    Cogn Process; 2018 Nov; 19(4):557-561. PubMed ID: 29796847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.
    Dowd EW; Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 25737257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural Substrate for Metacognitive Accuracy of Tactile Working Memory.
    Gogulski J; Zetter R; Nyrhinen M; Pertovaara A; Carlson S
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Nov; 27(11):5343-5352. PubMed ID: 28968804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.