BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28470755)

  • 1. SIMONI (smart integrated monitoring) as a novel bioanalytical strategy for water quality assessment: Part i-model design and effect-based trigger values.
    van der Oost R; Sileno G; Suárez-Muñoz M; Nguyen MT; Besselink H; Brouwer A
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Sep; 36(9):2385-2399. PubMed ID: 28470755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SIMONI (Smart Integrated Monitoring) as a novel bioanalytical strategy for water quality assessment: Part II-field feasibility survey.
    van der Oost R; Sileno G; Janse T; Nguyen MT; Besselink H; Brouwer A
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Sep; 36(9):2400-2416. PubMed ID: 28470932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect-based trigger values for in vitro bioassays: Reading across from existing water quality guideline values.
    Escher BI; Neale PA; Leusch FD
    Water Res; 2015 Sep; 81():137-48. PubMed ID: 26057261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of a bioanalytical test battery for water quality monitoring: Fingerprinting identified micropollutants and their contribution to effects in surface water.
    Neale PA; Altenburger R; Aït-Aïssa S; Brion F; Busch W; de Aragão Umbuzeiro G; Denison MS; Du Pasquier D; Hilscherová K; Hollert H; Morales DA; Novák J; Schlichting R; Seiler TB; Serra H; Shao Y; Tindall AJ; Tollefsen KE; Williams TD; Escher BI
    Water Res; 2017 Oct; 123():734-750. PubMed ID: 28728110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bioanalytical tools for the evaluation of organic micropollutants during sewage treatment, water recycling and drinking water generation.
    Macova M; Toze S; Hodgers L; Mueller JF; Bartkow M; Escher BI
    Water Res; 2011 Aug; 45(14):4238-47. PubMed ID: 21704353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A tiered, integrated biological and chemical monitoring framework for contaminants of emerging concern in aquatic ecosystems.
    Maruya KA; Dodder NG; Mehinto AC; Denslow ND; Schlenk D; Snyder SA; Weisberg SB
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Jul; 12(3):540-7. PubMed ID: 26426153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk-based approach in the revised European Union drinking water legislation: Opportunities for bioanalytical tools.
    Dingemans MM; Baken KA; van der Oost R; Schriks M; van Wezel AP
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Jan; 15(1):126-134. PubMed ID: 30144268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Future water quality monitoring--adapting tools to deal with mixtures of pollutants in water resource management.
    Altenburger R; Ait-Aissa S; Antczak P; Backhaus T; Barceló D; Seiler TB; Brion F; Busch W; Chipman K; de Alda ML; de Aragão Umbuzeiro G; Escher BI; Falciani F; Faust M; Focks A; Hilscherova K; Hollender J; Hollert H; Jäger F; Jahnke A; Kortenkamp A; Krauss M; Lemkine GF; Munthe J; Neumann S; Schymanski EL; Scrimshaw M; Segner H; Slobodnik J; Smedes F; Kughathas S; Teodorovic I; Tindall AJ; Tollefsen KE; Walz KH; Williams TD; Van den Brink PJ; van Gils J; Vrana B; Zhang X; Brack W
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Apr; 512-513():540-551. PubMed ID: 25644849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bioassay battery interlaboratory investigation of emerging contaminants in spiked water extracts - Towards the implementation of bioanalytical monitoring tools in water quality assessment and monitoring.
    Di Paolo C; Ottermanns R; Keiter S; Ait-Aissa S; Bluhm K; Brack W; Breitholtz M; Buchinger S; Carere M; Chalon C; Cousin X; Dulio V; Escher BI; Hamers T; Hilscherová K; Jarque S; Jonas A; Maillot-Marechal E; Marneffe Y; Nguyen MT; Pandard P; Schifferli A; Schulze T; Seidensticker S; Seiler TB; Tang J; van der Oost R; Vermeirssen E; Zounková R; Zwart N; Hollert H
    Water Res; 2016 Nov; 104():473-484. PubMed ID: 27585427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Micropollutants in European rivers: A mode of action survey to support the development of effect-based tools for water monitoring.
    Busch W; Schmidt S; Kühne R; Schulze T; Krauss M; Altenburger R
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Aug; 35(8):1887-99. PubMed ID: 27299692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mixture effects of organic micropollutants present in water: towards the development of effect-based water quality trigger values for baseline toxicity.
    Tang JY; McCarty S; Glenn E; Neale PA; Warne MS; Escher BI
    Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(10):3300-14. PubMed ID: 23618317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating legacy contaminants and emerging chemicals in marine environments using adverse outcome pathways and biological effects-directed analysis.
    Hutchinson TH; Lyons BP; Thain JE; Law RJ
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2013 Sep; 74(2):517-25. PubMed ID: 23820191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is the Effect Assessment Approach for Fungicides as Laid Down in the European Food Safety Authority Aquatic Guidance Document Sufficiently Protective for Freshwater Ecosystems?
    Rico A; Brock TCM; Daam MA
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Oct; 38(10):2279-2293. PubMed ID: 31211455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploration of ToxCast/Tox21 bioassays as candidate bioanalytical tools for measuring groups of chemicals in water.
    Louisse J; Dingemans MML; Baken KA; van Wezel AP; Schriks M
    Chemosphere; 2018 Oct; 209():373-380. PubMed ID: 29935466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bioanalytical and chemical characterization of organic micropollutant mixtures in long-term exposed passive samplers from the Joint Danube Survey 4: Setting a baseline for water quality monitoring.
    Šauer P; Vrana B; Escher BI; Grabic R; Toušová Z; Krauss M; von der Ohe PC; König M; Grabicová K; Mikušová P; Prokeš R; Sobotka J; Fialová P; Novák J; Brack W; Hilscherová K
    Environ Int; 2023 Aug; 178():107957. PubMed ID: 37406370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advancements in effect-based surface water quality assessment.
    De Baat ML; Van der Oost R; Van der Lee GH; Wieringa N; Hamers T; Verdonschot PFM; De Voogt P; Kraak MHS
    Water Res; 2020 Sep; 183():116017. PubMed ID: 32673894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An adaptive, comprehensive monitoring strategy for chemicals of emerging concern (CECs) in California's Aquatic Ecosystems.
    Maruya KA; Schlenk D; Anderson PD; Denslow ND; Drewes JE; Olivieri AW; Scott GI; Snyder SA
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2014 Jan; 10(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 24129960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of the application of bioanalytical tools as surrogate measure of chemical contaminants in recycled water.
    Leusch FD; Khan SJ; Laingam S; Prochazka E; Froscio S; Trinh T; Chapman HF; Humpage A
    Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():300-15. PubMed ID: 24355290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect-Based Trigger Values for Mixtures of Chemicals in Surface Water Detected with In Vitro Bioassays.
    Escher BI; Neale PA
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2021 Feb; 40(2):487-499. PubMed ID: 33252775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a framework to derive effect-based trigger values to interpret CALUX data for drinking water quality.
    Been F; Pronk T; Louisse J; Houtman C; van der Velden-Slootweg T; van der Oost R; Dingemans MML
    Water Res; 2021 Apr; 193():116859. PubMed ID: 33540341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.