285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28470994)
1. Patient preference for radial versus femoral vascular access for elective coronary procedures: The PREVAS study.
Kok MM; Weernink MGM; von Birgelen C; Fens A; van der Heijden LC; van Til JA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 91(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 28470994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shared Decision-Making in Femoral Versus Radial Cardiac Catheterization.
Schwarzman L; Miron-Shatz T; Maki K; Hsueh L; Liu E; Tarashandegan D; Mendez F; Vidovich MI
Am J Cardiol; 2019 Jul; 124(2):190-194. PubMed ID: 31084997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient Experience and Preference in Transradial versus Transfemoral Access during Transarterial Radioembolization: A Randomized Single-Center Trial.
Liu LB; Cedillo MA; Bishay V; Ranade M; Patel RS; Kim E; Nowakowski SF; Lookstein RA; Fischman AM
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 30819485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice.
Barbash IM; Minha S; Gallino R; Lager R; Badr S; Loh JP; Kitabata H; Pendyala LK; Torguson R; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 24746598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of Access Site on Bleeding and Ischemic Events in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Prasugrel: The ACCOAST Access Substudy.
Porto I; Bolognese L; Dudek D; Goldstein P; Hamm C; Tanguay JF; Ten Berg J; Widimský P; Le Gall N; Zagar AJ; LeNarz LA; Miller D; Montalescot G;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(9):897-907. PubMed ID: 27151605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?
Mamas MA; Ratib K; Routledge H; Neyses L; Fraser DG; de Belder M; Ludman PF; Nolan J;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):698-706. PubMed ID: 23769648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety of transradial access compared to transfemoral access with hemostatic devices (vessel plugs and suture devices) after percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chugh Y; Bavishi C; Mojadidi MK; Elgendy IY; Faillace RT; Brilakis ES; Tamis-Holland J; Mamas M; Chugh SK
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Aug; 96(2):285-295. PubMed ID: 32521099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation safety and vascular access: attitudes among cardiologists worldwide.
Vidovich MI; Khan AA; Xie H; Shroff AR
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2015 Mar; 16(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 25669957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transfemoral approach with systematic use of FemoSeal™ closure device compared to transradial approach in primary angioplasty.
Alonzo A; Rigattieri S; Giovannelli F; Di Russo C; Sciahbasi A; Berni A; Volpe M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):849-54. PubMed ID: 26104978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure comparing transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary procedures: rationale and design of the minimizing adverse haemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX - RAdiation Dose study (RAD-MATRIX).
Sciahbasi A; Calabrò P; Sarandrea A; Rigattieri S; Tomassini F; Sardella G; Zavalloni D; Cortese B; Limbruno U; Tebaldi M; Gagnor A; Rubartelli P; Zingarelli A; Valgimigli M
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 24746599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transradial versus transfemoral ancillary approach in complex structural, coronary, and peripheral interventions. Results from the multicenter ancillary registry: A study of the Italian Radial Club.
Cortese B; Rigattieri S; Aranzulla TC; Russo F; Latib A; Burzotta F; Agostoni P; Ielasi A; Tarantino F; Sticchi A; Di Palma G; de Benedictis M; Trani C; Boccaletti R; Miccoli R; Valsecchi O; Colombo A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 91(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 28463463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Left main percutaneous coronary intervention-Radial versus femoral access: A systematic analysis.
Goel S; Pasam RT; Raheja H; Gotesman J; Gidwani U; Ahuja KR; Reed G; Puri R; Khatri JK; Kapadia SR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 95(7):E201-E213. PubMed ID: 31430040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transradial versus transfemoral access for cardiac catheterization: a nationwide pilot study of training preferences and expertise in The United States.
Changal K; Syed MA; Atari E; Nazir S; Saleem S; Gul S; Salman FNU; Inayat A; Eltahawy E
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2021 May; 21(1):250. PubMed ID: 34020605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Health Economic Analysis of Access Site Practice in England During Changes in Practice: Insights From the British Cardiovascular Interventional Society.
Mamas MA; Tosh J; Hulme W; Hoskins N; Bungey G; Ludman P; de Belder M; Kwok CS; Verin N; Kinnaird T; Bennett E; Curzen N; Nolan J; Kontopantelis E
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2018 May; 11(5):e004482. PubMed ID: 29743163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Dahal K; Rijal J; Lee J; Korr KS; Azrin M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):857-65. PubMed ID: 26332022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty - A prospective, randomized comparison.
Bhat FA; Changal KH; Raina H; Tramboo NA; Rather HA
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28077091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relative importance of attribute preferences for radial vs. femoral arterial access: A crowdsourcing study of healthy online-recruited volunteers.
Ross J; Vidovich MI
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jun; 93(7):1237-1243. PubMed ID: 30341974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of radial versus femoral access site on coronary angiography and intervention outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Brener MI; Bush A; Miller JM; Hasan RK
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 90(7):1093-1104. PubMed ID: 28544320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Young Age and Gender on Outcomes of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access Coronary Angiography.
Singh K; Tavella R; Air T; Worthley M; Sinhal A; Arstall M; Zeitz C; Beltrame J
Angiology; 2021 Mar; 72(3):228-235. PubMed ID: 32969268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A reality check in transradial access: a single-centre comparison of transradial and transfemoral access for abdominal and peripheral intervention.
Hung ML; Lee EW; McWilliams JP; Padia SA; Ding P; Kee ST
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 29926207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
