278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28471221)
1. The salience of a reward cue can outlast reward devaluation.
De Tommaso M; Mastropasqua T; Turatto M
Behav Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 131(3):226-234. PubMed ID: 28471221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the resilience of reward cues attentional salience to reward devaluation, time, incentive learning, and contingency remapping.
De Tommaso M; Turatto M
Behav Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 135(3):389-401. PubMed ID: 33914569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple reward-cue contingencies favor expectancy over uncertainty in shaping the reward-cue attentional salience.
De Tommaso M; Mastropasqua T; Turatto M
Psychol Res; 2019 Mar; 83(2):332-346. PubMed ID: 29372304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Task relevance regulates the interaction between reward expectation and emotion.
Wei P; Kang G
Exp Brain Res; 2014 Jun; 232(6):1783-91. PubMed ID: 24553754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attentional capture by alcohol-related stimuli may be activated involuntarily by top-down search goals.
Brown CRH; Duka T; Forster S
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2018 Jul; 235(7):2087-2099. PubMed ID: 29696310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reward processing in the value-driven attention network: reward signals tracking cue identity and location.
Anderson BA
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 12(3):461-467. PubMed ID: 27677944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value-driven attentional capture in neglect.
Bourgeois A; Saj A; Vuilleumier P
Cortex; 2018 Dec; 109():260-271. PubMed ID: 30391880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reward favors the prepared: Incentive and task-informative cues interact to enhance attentional control.
Chiew KS; Braver TS
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jan; 42(1):52-66. PubMed ID: 26322689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cortical Brain Activity Reflecting Attentional Biasing Toward Reward-Predicting Cues Covaries with Economic Decision-Making Performance.
San Martín R; Appelbaum LG; Huettel SA; Woldorff MG
Cereb Cortex; 2016 Jan; 26(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 25139941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attentional capture by signals of reward persists following outcome devaluation.
Watson P; Pavri Y; Le J; Pearson D; Le Pelley ME
Learn Mem; 2022 Jul; 29(7):181-191. PubMed ID: 35820792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Strategic top-down control versus attentional bias by previous reward history.
Lynn J; Shin M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2207-16. PubMed ID: 26041273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Testing reward-cue attentional salience: Attainment and dynamic changes.
De Tommaso M; Turatto M
Br J Psychol; 2022 May; 113(2):396-411. PubMed ID: 34708867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validating incentive salience with functional magnetic resonance imaging: association between mesolimbic cue reactivity and attentional bias in alcohol-dependent patients.
Vollstädt-Klein S; Loeber S; Richter A; Kirsch M; Bach P; von der Goltz C; Hermann D; Mann K; Kiefer F
Addict Biol; 2012 Jul; 17(4):807-16. PubMed ID: 21790907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Drug cue induced overshadowing: selective disruption of natural reward processing by cigarette cues amongst abstinent but not satiated smokers.
Freeman TP; Morgan CJ; Beesley T; Curran HV
Psychol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):161-71. PubMed ID: 21733292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pavlovian reward learning underlies value driven attentional capture.
Bucker B; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):415-428. PubMed ID: 27905069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How Attention Changes in Response to Incentives.
Sawaki R; Luck SJ; Raymond JE
J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 27(11):2229-39. PubMed ID: 26151604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attentional modulation of reward processing in the human brain.
Rothkirch M; Schmack K; Deserno L; Darmohray D; Sterzer P
Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Jul; 35(7):3036-51. PubMed ID: 24307490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Viewers prefer predictive cues.
Kuratomi K; Yoshizaki K
Conscious Cogn; 2016 Aug; 44():179-185. PubMed ID: 27512910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Winners and losers: Reward and punishment produce biases in temporal selection.
Le Pelley ME; Watson P; Pearson D; Abeywickrama RS; Most SB
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 May; 45(5):822-833. PubMed ID: 29985032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How Does Awareness Modulate Goal-Directed and Stimulus-Driven Shifts of Attention Triggered by Value Learning?
Bourgeois A; Neveu R; Vuilleumier P
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160469. PubMed ID: 27483371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
