These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28471221)

  • 21. Implicit motivational value and salience are processed in distinct areas of orbitofrontal cortex.
    Rothkirch M; Schmack K; Schlagenhauf F; Sterzer P
    Neuroimage; 2012 Sep; 62(3):1717-25. PubMed ID: 22728149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attentional set and explicit expectations of perceptual load determine flanker interference.
    Eayrs JO; Kukkonen N; Prutean N; Steendam ST; Boehler CN; Wiersema JR; Krebs RM; Notebaert W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Jul; 50(7):769-784. PubMed ID: 38722582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Negative mood increases selective attention to food cues and subjective appetite.
    Hepworth R; Mogg K; Brignell C; Bradley BP
    Appetite; 2010 Feb; 54(1):134-42. PubMed ID: 19815043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Human prosaccades and antisaccades under risk: effects of penalties and rewards on visual selection and the value of actions.
    Ross M; Lanyon LJ; Viswanathan J; Manoach DS; Barton JJ
    Neuroscience; 2011 Nov; 196():168-77. PubMed ID: 21846493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dissociable neural mechanisms underlie value-driven and selection-driven attentional capture.
    Kim H; Anderson BA
    Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 1708():109-115. PubMed ID: 30468726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Inadequate early social experience increases the incentive salience of reward-related cues in adulthood.
    Lomanowska AM; Lovic V; Rankine MJ; Mooney SJ; Robinson TE; Kraemer GW
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 220(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 21277909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Irrelevant learned reward associations disrupt voluntary spatial attention.
    MacLean MH; Diaz GK; Giesbrecht B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2241-52. PubMed ID: 27084702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interaction between value and perceptual salience in value-driven attentional capture.
    Wang L; Yu H; Zhou X
    J Vis; 2013 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23479463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Relative salience versus relative validity: cue salience influences blocking in human associative learning.
    Le Pelley ME; Beesley T; Griffiths O
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):116-32. PubMed ID: 24099508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Individual differences in anticipatory activity to food rewards predict cue-induced appetitive 50-kHz calls in rats.
    Brenes JC; Schwarting RK
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Oct; 149():107-18. PubMed ID: 25992480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reward can modulate attentional capture, independent of top-down set.
    Munneke J; Hoppenbrouwers SS; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2540-8. PubMed ID: 26178858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of motivational salience on saccade latencies.
    Rothkirch M; Ostendorf F; Sax AL; Sterzer P
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Jan; 224(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 23283417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Where is the chocolate? Rapid spatial orienting toward stimuli associated with primary rewards.
    Pool E; Brosch T; Delplanque S; Sander D
    Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):348-59. PubMed ID: 24389311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Independent effects of reward expectation and spatial orientation on the processing of emotional facial expressions.
    Kang G; Zhou X; Wei P
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Sep; 233(9):2571-80. PubMed ID: 26026807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In monkeys making value-based decisions, amygdala neurons are sensitive to cue value as distinct from cue salience.
    Leathers ML; Olson CR
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Apr; 117(4):1499-1511. PubMed ID: 28077664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Attentional bias to threat in the general population is contingent on target competition, not on attentional control settings.
    Wirth BE; Wentura D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Apr; 71(4):975-988. PubMed ID: 28303742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Value-modulated attentional capture is augmented by win-related sensory cues.
    Pearson D; Piao M; Le Pelley ME
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jan; 77(1):133-143. PubMed ID: 36803153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Novelty enhances visual salience independently of reward in the parietal lobe.
    Foley NC; Jangraw DC; Peck C; Gottlieb J
    J Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 34(23):7947-57. PubMed ID: 24899716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The blocking effect in associative learning involves learned biases in rapid attentional capture.
    Luque D; Vadillo MA; Gutiérrez-Cobo MJ; Le Pelley ME
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):522-544. PubMed ID: 27874321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Investigating cue competition in contextual cuing of visual search.
    Beesley T; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):709-25. PubMed ID: 21895393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.