These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28472062)
1. Using CorvisST tonometry to assess glaucoma progression. Matsuura M; Hirasawa K; Murata H; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176380. PubMed ID: 28472062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The usefulness of CorvisST Tonometry and the Ocular Response Analyzer to assess the progression of glaucoma. Matsuura M; Hirasawa K; Murata H; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():40798. PubMed ID: 28094315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association between Corneal Biomechanical Properties with Ocular Response Analyzer and Also CorvisST Tonometry, and Glaucomatous Visual Field Severity. Hirasawa K; Matsuura M; Murata H; Nakakura S; Nakao Y; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2017 Jun; 6(3):18. PubMed ID: 28626602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Relationship between the Waveform Parameters from the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Progression of Glaucoma. Aoki S; Murata H; Matsuura M; Fujino Y; Nakakura S; Nakao Y; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2018; 1(2):123-131. PubMed ID: 32672562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Relationship between Corvis ST Tonometry and Ocular Response Analyzer Measurements in Eyes with Glaucoma. Matsuura M; Hirasawa K; Murata H; Yanagisawa M; Nakao Y; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161742. PubMed ID: 27580243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation between elastic energy stored in an eye and visual field progression in glaucoma. Aoki S; Murata H; Nakakura S; Nakao Y; Matsuura M; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204451. PubMed ID: 30240430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of a Novel Corneal Concavity Shape Parameter and Its Association with Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression. Aoki S; Murata H; Nakakura S; Nakao Y; Matsuura M; Fujino Y; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2019; 2(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 32672557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma. Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas]. Umurhan Akkan JC; Akkan F; Sezgin Akcay BI; Ayintap E; Tuncer K Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Oct; 232(10):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26512850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in Axial Length and Progression of Visual Field Damage in Glaucoma. Yanagisawa M; Yamashita T; Matsuura M; Fujino Y; Murata H; Asaoka R Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Jan; 59(1):407-417. PubMed ID: 29351357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Relationship between Corvis ST Tonometry Measured Corneal Parameters and Intraocular Pressure, Corneal Thickness and Corneal Curvature. Asaoka R; Nakakura S; Tabuchi H; Murata H; Nakao Y; Ihara N; Rimayanti U; Aihara M; Kiuchi Y PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140385. PubMed ID: 26485129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma. Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Corneal Biomechanical Parameters and Asymmetric Visual Field Damage in Patients with Untreated Normal Tension Glaucoma. Li BB; Cai Y; Pan YZ; Li M; Qiao RH; Fang Y; Tian T Chin Med J (Engl); 2017 Feb; 130(3):334-339. PubMed ID: 28139518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk factors for visual field progression in treated glaucoma. De Moraes CG; Juthani VJ; Liebmann JM; Teng CC; Tello C; Susanna R; Ritch R Arch Ophthalmol; 2011 May; 129(5):562-8. PubMed ID: 21555607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel method to predict visual field progression more accurately, using intraocular pressure measurements in glaucoma patients. Japanese Archive of Multicentral Database in Glaucoma (JAMDIG) construction group Sci Rep; 2016 Aug; 6():31728. PubMed ID: 27562553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug camera for evaluation of corneal deformation response and its impact on IOP measurement. Leung CK; Ye C; Weinreb RN Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Apr; 54(4):2885-92. PubMed ID: 23482466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors affecting rates of visual field progression in glaucoma patients with optic disc hemorrhage. Prata TS; De Moraes CG; Teng CC; Tello C; Ritch R; Liebmann JM Ophthalmology; 2010 Jan; 117(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 19896197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma. Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of focal lamina cribrosa defect on glaucomatous visual field progression. Faridi OS; Park SC; Kabadi R; Su D; De Moraes CG; Liebmann JM; Ritch R Ophthalmology; 2014 Aug; 121(8):1524-30. PubMed ID: 24697910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Tonnu PA; Ho T; Newson T; El Sheikh A; Sharma K; White E; Bunce C; Garway-Heath D Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul; 89(7):851-4. PubMed ID: 15965165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]