These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28472276)

  • 1. Reliability of algorithmic somatic copy number alteration detection from targeted capture data.
    Rieber N; Bohnert R; Ziehm U; Jansen G
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Sep; 33(18):2791-2798. PubMed ID: 28472276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DEFOR: depth- and frequency-based somatic copy number alteration detector.
    Zhang H; Zhan X; Brugarolas J; Xie Y
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 35(19):3824-3825. PubMed ID: 30860569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative analysis of methods for identifying somatic copy number alterations from deep sequencing data.
    Alkodsi A; Louhimo R; Hautaniemi S
    Brief Bioinform; 2015 Mar; 16(2):242-54. PubMed ID: 24599115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining targeted sequencing and ultra-low-pass whole-genome sequencing for accurate somatic copy number alteration detection.
    Fu J; Guo W; Yan C; Lv Z; Wang Y; Wang Z; Fan Z; Lei T
    Funct Integr Genomics; 2021 Mar; 21(2):161-169. PubMed ID: 33543400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and reproducibility of somatic point mutation calling in clinical-type targeted sequencing data.
    Karimnezhad A; Palidwor GA; Thavorn K; Stewart DJ; Campbell PA; Lo B; Perkins TJ
    BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Oct; 13(1):156. PubMed ID: 33059707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Validation Framework for Somatic Copy Number Detection in Targeted Sequencing Panels.
    Chandramohan R; Reuther J; Gandhi I; Voicu H; Alvarez KR; Plon SE; Lopez-Terrada DH; Fisher KE; Parsons DW; Roy A
    J Mol Diagn; 2022 Jul; 24(7):760-774. PubMed ID: 35487348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simultaneous Copy Number Alteration and Single-Nucleotide Variation Analysis in Matched Aqueous Humor and Tumor Samples in Children with Retinoblastoma.
    Schmidt MJ; Prabakar RK; Pike S; Yellapantula V; Peng CC; Kuhn P; Hicks J; Xu L; Berry JL
    Int J Mol Sci; 2023 May; 24(10):. PubMed ID: 37239954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low-cost and clinically applicable copy number profiling using repeat DNA.
    Abujudeh S; Zeki SS; van Lanschot MCJ; Pusung M; Weaver JMJ; Li X; Noorani A; Metz AJ; Bornschein J; Bower L; Miremadi A; Fitzgerald RC; Morrissey ER; Lynch AG
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Aug; 23(1):599. PubMed ID: 35978291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of somatic copy number estimation tools for whole-exome sequencing data.
    Nam JY; Kim NK; Kim SC; Joung JG; Xi R; Lee S; Park PJ; Park WY
    Brief Bioinform; 2016 Mar; 17(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 26210357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the reproducibility of exome copy number variations predictions.
    Hong CS; Singh LN; Mullikin JC; Biesecker LG
    Genome Med; 2016 Aug; 8(1):82. PubMed ID: 27503473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polishing copy number variant calls on exome sequencing data via deep learning.
    Özden F; Alkan C; Çiçek AE
    Genome Res; 2022 Jun; 32(6):1170-1182. PubMed ID: 35697522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bamgineer: Introduction of simulated allele-specific copy number variants into exome and targeted sequence data sets.
    Samadian S; Bruce JP; Pugh TJ
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Mar; 14(3):e1006080. PubMed ID: 29590101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliable Analysis of Clinical Tumor-Only Whole-Exome Sequencing Data.
    Oh S; Geistlinger L; Ramos M; Morgan M; Waldron L; Riester M
    JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2020 Apr; 4():321-335. PubMed ID: 32282230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detailed simulation of cancer exome sequencing data reveals differences and common limitations of variant callers.
    Hofmann AL; Behr J; Singer J; Kuipers J; Beisel C; Schraml P; Moch H; Beerenwinkel N
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):8. PubMed ID: 28049408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tangent normalization for somatic copy-number inference in cancer genome analysis.
    Gao GF; Oh C; Saksena G; Deng D; Westlake LC; Hill BA; Reich M; Schumacher SE; Berger AC; Carter SL; Cherniack AD; Meyerson M; Tabak B; Beroukhim R; Getz G
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Oct; 38(20):4677-4686. PubMed ID: 36040167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. AbsCN-seq: a statistical method to estimate tumor purity, ploidy and absolute copy numbers from next-generation sequencing data.
    Bao L; Pu M; Messer K
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Apr; 30(8):1056-1063. PubMed ID: 24389661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. isoCNV: in silico optimization of copy number variant detection from targeted or exome sequencing data.
    Barcelona-Cabeza R; Sanseverino W; Aiese Cigliano R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Oct; 22(1):530. PubMed ID: 34715772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficient detection of chromosome imbalances and single nucleotide variants using targeted sequencing in the clinical setting.
    Villela D; Costa SS; Vianna-Morgante AM; Krepischi ACV; Rosenberg C
    Eur J Med Genet; 2017 Dec; 60(12):667-674. PubMed ID: 28882788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using SAAS-CNV to Detect and Characterize Somatic Copy Number Alterations in Cancer Genomes from Next Generation Sequencing and SNP Array Data.
    Zhang Z; Hao K
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1833():29-47. PubMed ID: 30039361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of copy number variation detection tools for cancer using whole exome sequencing data.
    Zare F; Dow M; Monteleone N; Hosny A; Nabavi S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 18(1):286. PubMed ID: 28569140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.