180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28472276)
1. Reliability of algorithmic somatic copy number alteration detection from targeted capture data.
Rieber N; Bohnert R; Ziehm U; Jansen G
Bioinformatics; 2017 Sep; 33(18):2791-2798. PubMed ID: 28472276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DEFOR: depth- and frequency-based somatic copy number alteration detector.
Zhang H; Zhan X; Brugarolas J; Xie Y
Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 35(19):3824-3825. PubMed ID: 30860569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative analysis of methods for identifying somatic copy number alterations from deep sequencing data.
Alkodsi A; Louhimo R; Hautaniemi S
Brief Bioinform; 2015 Mar; 16(2):242-54. PubMed ID: 24599115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combining targeted sequencing and ultra-low-pass whole-genome sequencing for accurate somatic copy number alteration detection.
Fu J; Guo W; Yan C; Lv Z; Wang Y; Wang Z; Fan Z; Lei T
Funct Integr Genomics; 2021 Mar; 21(2):161-169. PubMed ID: 33543400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reproducibility of somatic point mutation calling in clinical-type targeted sequencing data.
Karimnezhad A; Palidwor GA; Thavorn K; Stewart DJ; Campbell PA; Lo B; Perkins TJ
BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Oct; 13(1):156. PubMed ID: 33059707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Validation Framework for Somatic Copy Number Detection in Targeted Sequencing Panels.
Chandramohan R; Reuther J; Gandhi I; Voicu H; Alvarez KR; Plon SE; Lopez-Terrada DH; Fisher KE; Parsons DW; Roy A
J Mol Diagn; 2022 Jul; 24(7):760-774. PubMed ID: 35487348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simultaneous Copy Number Alteration and Single-Nucleotide Variation Analysis in Matched Aqueous Humor and Tumor Samples in Children with Retinoblastoma.
Schmidt MJ; Prabakar RK; Pike S; Yellapantula V; Peng CC; Kuhn P; Hicks J; Xu L; Berry JL
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 May; 24(10):. PubMed ID: 37239954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Low-cost and clinically applicable copy number profiling using repeat DNA.
Abujudeh S; Zeki SS; van Lanschot MCJ; Pusung M; Weaver JMJ; Li X; Noorani A; Metz AJ; Bornschein J; Bower L; Miremadi A; Fitzgerald RC; Morrissey ER; Lynch AG
BMC Genomics; 2022 Aug; 23(1):599. PubMed ID: 35978291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of somatic copy number estimation tools for whole-exome sequencing data.
Nam JY; Kim NK; Kim SC; Joung JG; Xi R; Lee S; Park PJ; Park WY
Brief Bioinform; 2016 Mar; 17(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 26210357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the reproducibility of exome copy number variations predictions.
Hong CS; Singh LN; Mullikin JC; Biesecker LG
Genome Med; 2016 Aug; 8(1):82. PubMed ID: 27503473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bamgineer: Introduction of simulated allele-specific copy number variants into exome and targeted sequence data sets.
Samadian S; Bruce JP; Pugh TJ
PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Mar; 14(3):e1006080. PubMed ID: 29590101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detailed simulation of cancer exome sequencing data reveals differences and common limitations of variant callers.
Hofmann AL; Behr J; Singer J; Kuipers J; Beisel C; Schraml P; Moch H; Beerenwinkel N
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):8. PubMed ID: 28049408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Polishing copy number variant calls on exome sequencing data via deep learning.
Özden F; Alkan C; Çiçek AE
Genome Res; 2022 Jun; 32(6):1170-1182. PubMed ID: 35697522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tangent normalization for somatic copy-number inference in cancer genome analysis.
Gao GF; Oh C; Saksena G; Deng D; Westlake LC; Hill BA; Reich M; Schumacher SE; Berger AC; Carter SL; Cherniack AD; Meyerson M; Tabak B; Beroukhim R; Getz G
Bioinformatics; 2022 Oct; 38(20):4677-4686. PubMed ID: 36040167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. AbsCN-seq: a statistical method to estimate tumor purity, ploidy and absolute copy numbers from next-generation sequencing data.
Bao L; Pu M; Messer K
Bioinformatics; 2014 Apr; 30(8):1056-1063. PubMed ID: 24389661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. isoCNV: in silico optimization of copy number variant detection from targeted or exome sequencing data.
Barcelona-Cabeza R; Sanseverino W; Aiese Cigliano R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Oct; 22(1):530. PubMed ID: 34715772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliable Analysis of Clinical Tumor-Only Whole-Exome Sequencing Data.
Oh S; Geistlinger L; Ramos M; Morgan M; Waldron L; Riester M
JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2020 Apr; 4():321-335. PubMed ID: 32282230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficient detection of chromosome imbalances and single nucleotide variants using targeted sequencing in the clinical setting.
Villela D; Costa SS; Vianna-Morgante AM; Krepischi ACV; Rosenberg C
Eur J Med Genet; 2017 Dec; 60(12):667-674. PubMed ID: 28882788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using SAAS-CNV to Detect and Characterize Somatic Copy Number Alterations in Cancer Genomes from Next Generation Sequencing and SNP Array Data.
Zhang Z; Hao K
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1833():29-47. PubMed ID: 30039361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An evaluation of copy number variation detection tools for cancer using whole exome sequencing data.
Zare F; Dow M; Monteleone N; Hosny A; Nabavi S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 18(1):286. PubMed ID: 28569140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
