These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28472925)

  • 1. Registration error of the liver CT using deformable image registration of MIM Maestro and Velocity AI.
    Fukumitsu N; Nitta K; Terunuma T; Okumura T; Numajiri H; Oshiro Y; Ohnishi K; Mizumoto M; Aihara T; Ishikawa H; Tsuboi K; Sakurai H
    BMC Med Imaging; 2017 May; 17(1):30. PubMed ID: 28472925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Structure guided deformable image registration for treatment planning CT and post stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) Primovist
    Kuznetsova S; Grendarova P; Roy S; Sinha R; Thind K; Ploquin N
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 20(12):109-118. PubMed ID: 31755658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Site-specific deformable imaging registration algorithm selection using patient-based simulated deformations.
    Nie K; Chuang C; Kirby N; Braunstein S; Pouliot J
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041911. PubMed ID: 23556905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of three deformable image registration algorithms for the thorax.
    Latifi K; Zhang G; Stawicki M; van Elmpt W; Dekker A; Forster K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 14(1):3834. PubMed ID: 23318377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multi-institutional Validation Study of Commercially Available Deformable Image Registration Software for Thoracic Images.
    Kadoya N; Nakajima Y; Saito M; Miyabe Y; Kurooka M; Kito S; Fujita Y; Sasaki M; Arai K; Tani K; Yagi M; Wakita A; Tohyama N; Jingu K
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Oct; 96(2):422-431. PubMed ID: 27475673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DIRBoost-an algorithm for boosting deformable image registration: application to lung CT intra-subject registration.
    Muenzing SE; van Ginneken B; Viergever MA; Pluim JP
    Med Image Anal; 2014 Apr; 18(3):449-59. PubMed ID: 24556079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Representing the dosimetric impact of deformable image registration errors.
    Vickress J; Battista J; Barnett R; Yartsev S
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(17):N391-N403. PubMed ID: 28800299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of various deformable image registration algorithms for thoracic images.
    Kadoya N; Fujita Y; Katsuta Y; Dobashi S; Takeda K; Kishi K; Kubozono M; Umezawa R; Sugawara T; Matsushita H; Jingu K
    J Radiat Res; 2014 Jan; 55(1):175-82. PubMed ID: 23869025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A framework for deformable image registration validation in radiotherapy clinical applications.
    Varadhan R; Karangelis G; Krishnan K; Hui S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 14(1):4066. PubMed ID: 23318394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new registration/visualization paradigm for CT-fluoroscopy guided RF liver ablation.
    Micu R; Jakobs TF; Urschler M; Navab N
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):882-90. PubMed ID: 17354974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability in commercially available deformable image registration: A multi-institution analysis using virtual head and neck phantoms.
    Kubli A; Pukala J; Shah AP; Kelly P; Langen KM; Bova FJ; Mañon RR; Meeks SL
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 May; 22(5):89-96. PubMed ID: 33783960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of deformable image registration accuracy using computational modeling.
    Zhong H; Kim J; Chetty IJ
    Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):970-9. PubMed ID: 20384233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated segmentation of a motion mask to preserve sliding motion in deformable registration of thoracic CT.
    Vandemeulebroucke J; Bernard O; Rit S; Kybic J; Clarysse P; Sarrut D
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1006-15. PubMed ID: 22320810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal subtraction contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT.
    Gazi PM; Aminololama-Shakeri S; Yang K; Boone JM
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6322-46. PubMed ID: 27494376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the dosimetric effect and reduction of inverse consistency and transitivity errors in deformable image registration for dose accumulation.
    Bender ET; Hardcastle N; Tomé WA
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):272-80. PubMed ID: 22225297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The need for application-based adaptation of deformable image registration.
    Kirby N; Chuang C; Ueda U; Pouliot J
    Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011702. PubMed ID: 23298072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Globally optimal deformable registration on a minimum spanning tree using dense displacement sampling.
    Heinrich MP; Jenkinson M; Sir Michael Brady ; Schnabel JA
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 3):115-22. PubMed ID: 23286121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A method for registration of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and computed tomography (CT) images for liver stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT).
    Gayou O; Day E; Mohammadi S; Kirichenko A
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7398-401. PubMed ID: 23231289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deformable registration of 4D computed tomography data.
    Rietzel E; Chen GT
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4423-30. PubMed ID: 17153421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physically-based validation of deformable medical image registration.
    Lee HP; Lin MC; Foskey M
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2008; 11(Pt 2):830-8. PubMed ID: 18982682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.