475 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28473598)
1. Test-Retest Variability in Lesion SUV and Lesion SUR in
Hofheinz F; Apostolova I; Oehme L; Kotzerke J; van den Hoff J
J Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 58(11):1770-1775. PubMed ID: 28473598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Prospective Assessment in 2 Multicenter Trials.
Weber WA; Gatsonis CA; Mozley PD; Hanna LG; Shields AF; Aberle DR; Govindan R; Torigian DA; Karp JS; Yu JQ; Subramaniam RM; Halvorsen RA; Siegel BA; ;
J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1137-43. PubMed ID: 25908829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repeatability of Quantitative Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake Measures as Function of Uptake Interval and Lesion Selection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.
Kramer GM; Frings V; Hoetjes N; Hoekstra OS; Smit EF; de Langen AJ; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1343-9. PubMed ID: 27103020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver agreement of qualitative analysis and tumor delineation of 18F-fluoromisonidazole and 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine PET images in lung cancer.
Thureau S; Chaumet-Riffaud P; Modzelewski R; Fernandez P; Tessonnier L; Vervueren L; Cachin F; Berriolo-Riedinger A; Olivier P; Kolesnikov-Gauthier H; Blagosklonov O; Bridji B; Devillers A; Collombier L; Courbon F; Gremillet E; Houzard C; Caignon JM; Roux J; Aide N; Brenot-Rossi I; Doyeux K; Dubray B; Vera P
J Nucl Med; 2013 Sep; 54(9):1543-50. PubMed ID: 23918733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of prone versus supine 18F-FDG-PET of locally advanced breast cancer: Phantom and preliminary clinical studies.
Williams JM; Rani SD; Li X; Arlinghaus LR; Lee TC; MacDonald LR; Partridge SC; Kang H; Whisenant JG; Abramson RG; Linden HM; Kinahan PE; Yankeelov TE
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3801-13. PubMed ID: 26133582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation of PET standard uptake value and CT window-level thresholds for target delineation in CT-based radiation treatment planning.
Hong R; Halama J; Bova D; Sethi A; Emami B
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Mar; 67(3):720-6. PubMed ID: 17293230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multicenter Clinical Trials Using 18F-FDG PET to Measure Early Response to Oncologic Therapy: Effects of Injection-to-Acquisition Time Variability on Required Sample Size.
Kurland BF; Muzi M; Peterson LM; Doot RK; Wangerin KA; Mankoff DA; Linden HM; Kinahan PE
J Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 57(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 26493206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Zhang H; Wroblewski K; Liao S; Kampalath R; Penney BC; Zhang Y; Pu Y
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22999369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Node/aorta and node/liver SUV ratios from (18)F-FDG PET/CT may improve the detection of occult mediastinal lymph node metastases in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma.
Kuo WH; Wu YC; Wu CY; Ho KC; Chiu PH; Wang CW; Chang CJ; Yu CT; Yen TC; Lin C
Acad Radiol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):685-92. PubMed ID: 22459646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic Value of Pretherapeutic Tumor-to-Blood Standardized Uptake Ratio in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma.
Bütof R; Hofheinz F; Zöphel K; Stadelmann T; Schmollack J; Jentsch C; Löck S; Kotzerke J; Baumann M; van den Hoff J
J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1150-6. PubMed ID: 26089549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Serial assessment of FDG-PET FDG uptake and functional volume during radiotherapy (RT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Edet-Sanson A; Dubray B; Doyeux K; Back A; Hapdey S; Modzelewski R; Bohn P; Gardin I; Vera P
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Feb; 102(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 21885145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of SUV, tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR), and dual time point measurements for assessment of the metabolic uptake rate in FDG PET.
Hofheinz F; Hoff Jv; Steffen IG; Lougovski A; Ego K; Amthauer H; Apostolova I
EJNMMI Res; 2016 Dec; 6(1):53. PubMed ID: 27334609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Within-patient variability of (18)F-FDG: standardized uptake values in normal tissues.
Paquet N; Albert A; Foidart J; Hustinx R
J Nucl Med; 2004 May; 45(5):784-8. PubMed ID: 15136627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of tumor volumes derived from glucose metabolic rate maps and SUV maps in dynamic 18F-FDG PET.
Visser EP; Philippens ME; Kienhorst L; Kaanders JH; Corstens FH; de Geus-Oei LF; Oyen WJ
J Nucl Med; 2008 Jun; 49(6):892-8. PubMed ID: 18483085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interobserver variability of image-derived arterial blood SUV in whole-body FDG PET.
Hofheinz F; Maus J; Zschaeck S; Rogasch J; Schramm G; Oehme L; Apostolova I; Kotzerke J; den Hoff JV
EJNMMI Res; 2019 Mar; 9(1):23. PubMed ID: 30830508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An investigation of the relation between tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR) and tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR) in oncological FDG PET.
Hofheinz F; Bütof R; Apostolova I; Zöphel K; Steffen IG; Amthauer H; Kotzerke J; Baumann M; van den Hoff J
EJNMMI Res; 2016 Dec; 6(1):19. PubMed ID: 26936768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intra-tumour 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity decreases the reliability on target volume definition with positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging.
Dong X; Wu P; Sun X; Li W; Wan H; Yu J; Xing L
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Jun; 59(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 25708154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The contribution of integrated PET/CT to the evolving definition of treatment volumes in radiation treatment planning in lung cancer.
Ashamalla H; Rafla S; Parikh K; Mokhtar B; Goswami G; Kambam S; Abdel-Dayem H; Guirguis A; Ross P; Evola A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Nov; 63(4):1016-23. PubMed ID: 15979817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative analysis of response to treatment with erlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer using 18F-FDG and 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine PET.
Kahraman D; Scheffler M; Zander T; Nogova L; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R; Neumaier B; Ullrich RT; Holstein A; Dietlein M; Wolf J; Kobe C
J Nucl Med; 2011 Dec; 52(12):1871-7. PubMed ID: 22065872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Standardized Uptake Values in Normal Structures Between PET/CT and PET/MRI in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital: A Prospective Study.
Lyons K; Seghers V; Sorensen JI; Zhang W; Paldino MJ; Krishnamurthy R; Rohren EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1094-101. PubMed ID: 26496558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
