193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28473683)
1. Positron emission mammography is a useful adjunct in assessment of dense breasts.
Kumar SK; Trujillo PB; Ucros GR
Med J Malaysia; 2017 Apr; 72(2):138-140. PubMed ID: 28473683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: Recent Advances in Imaging and Current Limitations.
Gegios AR; Peterson MS; Fowler AM
PET Clin; 2023 Oct; 18(4):459-471. PubMed ID: 37296043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of DWI as a Rapid Unenhanced Technique for Detecting Mammographically Occult Breast Cancer in Elevated-Risk Women With Dense Breasts.
McDonald ES; Hammersley JA; Chou SH; Rahbar H; Scheel JR; Lee CI; Liu CL; Lehman CD; Partridge SC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):205-16. PubMed ID: 27077731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast cancer detection using sonography in women with mammographically dense breasts.
Okello J; Kisembo H; Bugeza S; Galukande M
BMC Med Imaging; 2014 Dec; 14():41. PubMed ID: 25547239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The connecticut experiments second year: ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts.
Weigert J; Steenbergen S
Breast J; 2015; 21(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 25683369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An exploratory radiomics analysis on digital breast tomosynthesis in women with mammographically negative dense breasts.
Tagliafico AS; Valdora F; Mariscotti G; Durando M; Nori J; La Forgia D; Rosenberg I; Caumo F; Gandolfo N; Houssami N; Calabrese M
Breast; 2018 Aug; 40():92-96. PubMed ID: 29723697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deciphering the Breast Density Inform Law Movement: Implications for Practice.
Raj SD; Fein-Zachary V; Slanetz PJ
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2018 Feb; 39(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 29317035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up.
Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S
Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing tumor extent on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus full-field digital mammography and ultrasound.
Patel BK; Garza SA; Eversman S; Lopez-Alvarez Y; Kosiorek H; Pockaj BA
Clin Imaging; 2017; 46():78-84. PubMed ID: 28750354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-resolution diffusion-weighted MRI plus mammography for detecting clinically occult breast cancers in women with dense breasts.
Kim HJ; Shin HJ; Baek S; Lee CW; Choi WJ; Chae EY; Cha JH; Kim HH; Moon WK
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Jun; 175():111440. PubMed ID: 38547744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Yield of Pre-operative Breast MRI in Patients According to Breast Tissue Density.
Seely JM; Lamb L; Malik N; Lau J
Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3280-9. PubMed ID: 26620958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Focal Breast Pain: Does Breast Density Affect the Need for Ultrasound?
Cho MW; Grimm LJ; Johnson KS
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 27746121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Agreement between digital breast tomosynthesis and pathologic tumour size for staging breast cancer, and comparison with standard mammography.
Marinovich ML; Bernardi D; Macaskill P; Ventriglia A; Sabatino V; Houssami N
Breast; 2019 Feb; 43():59-66. PubMed ID: 30466027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-field digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts.
Mori M; Akashi-Tanaka S; Suzuki S; Daniels MI; Watanabe C; Hirose M; Nakamura S
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jan; 24(1):104-110. PubMed ID: 26942415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of California's Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening.
Chau SL; Alabaster A; Luikart K; Brenman LM; Habel LA
J Prim Care Community Health; 2017 Apr; 8(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 27799412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast-Specific γ-Imaging for the Detection of Mammographically Occult Breast Cancer in Women at Increased Risk.
Brem RF; Ruda RC; Yang JL; Coffey CM; Rapelyea JA
J Nucl Med; 2016 May; 57(5):678-84. PubMed ID: 26823569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Addition of ultrasound to mammography in the case of dense breast tissue: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Rebolj M; Assi V; Brentnall A; Parmar D; Duffy SW
Br J Cancer; 2018 Jun; 118(12):1559-1570. PubMed ID: 29736009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient Characteristics Associated With Patient-Reported Deterrents to Adjunct Breast Cancer Screening of Patients With Dense Breasts.
Miller MM; Repich K; Patrie JT; Anderson RT; Harvey JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Nov; 217(5):1069-1079. PubMed ID: 33147054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital volumetric measurement of mammographic density and the risk of overlooking cancer in Japanese women.
Sawada T; Akashi S; Nakamura S; Kuwayama T; Enokido K; Yoshida M; Hashimoto R; Ide T; Masuda H; Taruno K; Oyama H; Takamaru T; Kanada Y; Ikeda M; Kosugi N; Sato H; Nakayama S; Ata A; Tonouchi Y; Sakai H; Matsunaga Y; Matsutani A
Breast Cancer; 2017 Sep; 24(5):708-713. PubMed ID: 28238177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated Volumetric Analysis of Mammographic Density in a Screening Setting: Worse Outcomes for Women with Dense Breasts.
Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Lee CI; Akslen LA; Tsuruda KM; Elmore JG; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):343-352. PubMed ID: 29944088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
