253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28474182)
1. Homogenous scaffold-based cranial/skull implant modelling and structural analysis-unit cell algorithm-meshless approach.
Phanindra Bogu V; Ravi Kumar Y; Kumar Khanra A
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Nov; 55(11):2053-2065. PubMed ID: 28474182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modelling and structural analysis of skull/cranial implant: beyond mid-line deformities.
Bogu VP; Kumar YR; Kumar Khanara A
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2017; 19(1):125-131. PubMed ID: 28552926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK.
Carpenter RD; Klosterhoff BS; Torstrick FB; Foley KT; Burkus JK; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE; Safranski DL
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Apr; 80():68-76. PubMed ID: 29414477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design of customized implants and 3D printing of symmetric and asymmetric cranial cavities.
Singh HN; Agrawal S; Kuthe AM
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Oct; 146():106061. PubMed ID: 37544200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical behaviour of reconstructed defected skull with custom PEEK implant and Titanium fixture plates under dynamic loading conditions using FEM.
Jindal P; Bharti J; Gupta V; Dhami SS
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Oct; 146():106063. PubMed ID: 37556925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical characterization and numerical simulation of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cranial implants.
El Halabi F; Rodriguez JF; Rebolledo L; Hurtós E; Doblaré M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Nov; 4(8):1819-32. PubMed ID: 22098881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do Surface Porosity and Pore Size Influence Mechanical Properties and Cellular Response to PEEK?
Torstrick FB; Evans NT; Stevens HY; Gall K; Guldberg RE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2373-2383. PubMed ID: 27154533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of Surface Topography and Chemistry on Polyether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) and Titanium Osseointegration.
Torstrick FB; Lin ASP; Safranski DL; Potter D; Sulchek T; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Apr; 45(8):E417-E424. PubMed ID: 31703050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of PEEK Coating on Hip Implant Stress Shielding: A Finite Element Analysis.
Anguiano-Sanchez J; Martinez-Romero O; Siller HR; Diaz-Elizondo JA; Flores-Villalba E; Rodriguez CA
Comput Math Methods Med; 2016; 2016():6183679. PubMed ID: 27051460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the mechanical behaviour of PEEK and HA cranial implants under impact loading.
Garcia-Gonzalez D; Jayamohan J; Sotiropoulos SN; Yoon SH; Cook J; Siviour CR; Arias A; Jérusalem A
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 May; 69():342-354. PubMed ID: 28160738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite element and experimental analysis to select patient's bone condition specific porous dental implant, fabricated using additive manufacturing.
Chakraborty A; Datta P; Majumder S; Mondal SC; Roychowdhury A
Comput Biol Med; 2020 Sep; 124():103839. PubMed ID: 32763517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microstructure and mechanical properties of porous titanium structures fabricated by electron beam melting for cranial implants.
Moiduddin K
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2018 Feb; 232(2):185-199. PubMed ID: 29332500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can Polyether Ether Ketone Dethrone Titanium as the Choice Implant Material for Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery?
Kumar N; Ramakrishnan SA; Lopez KG; Madhu S; Ramos MRD; Fuh JYH; Hallinan J; Nolan CP; Benneker LM; Vellayappan BA
World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():94-109. PubMed ID: 33508491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impaction durability of porous polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and titanium-coated PEEK interbody fusion devices.
Torstrick FB; Klosterhoff BS; Westerlund LE; Foley KT; Gochuico J; Lee CSD; Gall K; Safranski DL
Spine J; 2018 May; 18(5):857-865. PubMed ID: 29366985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mesh Ti6Al4V Material Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting (SLM) as a Promising Intervertebral Fusion Cage.
Przekora A; Kazimierczak P; Wojcik M; Chodorski E; Kropiwnicki J
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Apr; 23(7):. PubMed ID: 35409345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of Patient-Specific Cranial Implant Design Using Finite Element Analysis.
Huys SEF; Van Gysel A; Mommaerts MY; Sloten JV
World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():198-204. PubMed ID: 33529765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The degree of peri-implant osteolysis induced by PEEK, CoCrMo, and HXLPE wear particles: a study based on a porous Ti6Al4V implant in a rabbit model.
Du Z; Zhu Z; Wang Y
J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Jan; 13(1):23. PubMed ID: 29386035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Design of patient specific bone stiffness mimicking scaffold.
Rana M; Chaudhuri A; Biswas JK; Karim SI; Datta P; Karmakar SK; Roychowdhury A
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Dec; 235(12):1453-1462. PubMed ID: 34227419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-strength, surface-porous polyether-ether-ketone for load-bearing orthopedic implants.
Evans NT; Torstrick FB; Lee CS; Dupont KM; Safranski DL; Chang WA; Macedo AE; Lin AS; Boothby JM; Whittingslow DC; Carson RA; Guldberg RE; Gall K
Acta Biomater; 2015 Feb; 13():159-67. PubMed ID: 25463499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Porous poly-ether ether ketone (PEEK) manufactured by a novel powder route using near-spherical salt bead porogens: characterisation and mechanical properties.
Siddiq AR; Kennedy AR
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2015 Feb; 47():180-8. PubMed ID: 25492187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
