237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28474359)
1. The HCUP SID Imputation Project: Improving Statistical Inferences for Health Disparities Research by Imputing Missing Race Data.
Ma Y; Zhang W; Lyman S; Huang Y
Health Serv Res; 2018 Jun; 53(3):1870-1889. PubMed ID: 28474359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A wide range of missing imputation approaches in longitudinal data: a simulation study and real data analysis.
Jahangiri M; Kazemnejad A; Goldfeld KS; Daneshpour MS; Mostafaei S; Khalili D; Moghadas MR; Akbarzadeh M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jul; 23(1):161. PubMed ID: 37415114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in a longitudinal categorical variable with restrictions on transitions over time: a simulation study.
De Silva AP; Moreno-Betancur M; De Livera AM; Lee KJ; Simpson JA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):14. PubMed ID: 30630434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using Bayesian Imputation to Assess Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Pediatric Performance Measures.
Brown DP; Knapp C; Baker K; Kaufmann M
Health Serv Res; 2016 Jun; 51(3):1095-108. PubMed ID: 26487321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Missing data and imputation: a practical illustration in a prognostic study on low back pain.
Vergouw D; Heymans MW; van der Windt DA; Foster NE; Dunn KM; van der Horst HE; de Vet HC
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2012 Jul; 35(6):464-71. PubMed ID: 22964020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiple imputation for handling missing outcome data when estimating the relative risk.
Sullivan TR; Lee KJ; Ryan P; Salter AB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):134. PubMed ID: 28877666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiple imputation using an iterative hot-deck with distance-based donor selection.
Siddique J; Belin TR
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(1):83-102. PubMed ID: 17634973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dealing with missing data in a multi-question depression scale: a comparison of imputation methods.
Shrive FM; Stuart H; Quan H; Ghali WA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Dec; 6():57. PubMed ID: 17166270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of multiple imputation methods for missing data in longitudinal studies.
Huque MH; Carlin JB; Simpson JA; Lee KJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):168. PubMed ID: 30541455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in longitudinal data in the presence of a time-varying covariate with a non-linear association with time: a simulation study.
De Silva AP; Moreno-Betancur M; De Livera AM; Lee KJ; Simpson JA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):114. PubMed ID: 28743256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of approaches for multiple imputation of three-level data.
Wijesuriya R; Moreno-Betancur M; Carlin JB; Lee KJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):207. PubMed ID: 32787781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Missing data in a multi-item instrument were best handled by multiple imputation at the item score level.
Eekhout I; de Vet HC; Twisk JW; Brand JP; de Boer MR; Heymans MW
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 67(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 24291505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Review and evaluation of imputation methods for multivariate longitudinal data with mixed-type incomplete variables.
Cao Y; Allore H; Vander Wyk B; Gutman R
Stat Med; 2022 Dec; 41(30):5844-5876. PubMed ID: 36220138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of methods for imputing limited-range variables: a simulation study.
Rodwell L; Lee KJ; Romaniuk H; Carlin JB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Apr; 14():57. PubMed ID: 24766825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Logistic regression vs. predictive mean matching for imputing binary covariates.
Austin PC; van Buuren S
Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Nov; 32(11):2172-2183. PubMed ID: 37750213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Missing data in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program are not missing at random: implications and potential impact on quality assessments.
Hamilton BH; Ko CY; Richards K; Hall BL
J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Feb; 210(2):125-139.e2. PubMed ID: 20113932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A bias-corrected estimator in multiple imputation for missing data.
Tomita H; Fujisawa H; Henmi M
Stat Med; 2018 Oct; 37(23):3373-3386. PubMed ID: 29845646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiple imputation of missing data in multilevel designs: A comparison of different strategies.
Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A; Grund S
Psychol Methods; 2017 Mar; 22(1):141-165. PubMed ID: 27607544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MISL: Multiple imputation by super learning.
Carpenito T; Manjourides J
Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Oct; 31(10):1904-1915. PubMed ID: 35658622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiple imputation of missing data under missing at random: compatible imputation models are not sufficient to avoid bias if they are mis-specified.
Curnow E; Carpenter JR; Heron JE; Cornish RP; Rach S; Didelez V; Langeheine M; Tilling K
J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Aug; 160():100-109. PubMed ID: 37343895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
