These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28476280)

  • 1. Alternative methods for calculating percentage prediction error and their implications for predicting body mass in fossil taxa.
    Yapuncich GS
    J Hum Evol; 2018 Feb; 115():140-145. PubMed ID: 28476280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting body mass of bonobos (Pan paniscus) with human-based morphometric equations.
    Yapuncich GS; Bowie A; Belais R; Churchill SE; Walker CS
    Am J Primatol; 2020 Feb; 82(2):e23088. PubMed ID: 31961002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A volumetric technique for fossil body mass estimation applied to Australopithecus afarensis.
    Brassey CA; O'Mahoney TG; Chamberlain AT; Sellers WI
    J Hum Evol; 2018 Feb; 115():47-64. PubMed ID: 28838563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Articular scaling and body mass estimation in platyrrhines and catarrhines: Modern variation and application to fossil anthropoids.
    Perry JMG; Cooke SB; Runestad Connour JA; Burgess ML; Ruff CB
    J Hum Evol; 2018 Feb; 115():20-35. PubMed ID: 29150186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating morphometric body mass prediction equations with a juvenile human test sample: accuracy and applicability to small-bodied hominins.
    Walker CS; Yapuncich GS; Sridhar S; Cameron N; Churchill SE
    J Hum Evol; 2018 Feb; 115():65-77. PubMed ID: 28476281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing for size and allometric differences in fossil hominin body mass estimation.
    Uhl NM; Rainwater CW; Konigsberg LW
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2013 Jun; 151(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 23588924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting euarchontan body mass: A comparison of tarsal and dental variables.
    Yapuncich GS; Gladman JT; Boyer DM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2015 Jul; 157(3):472-506. PubMed ID: 25821153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the accuracy of body mass estimation equations from pelvic and femoral variables among modern British women of known mass.
    Young M; Johannesdottir F; Poole K; Shaw C; Stock JT
    J Hum Evol; 2018 Feb; 115():130-139. PubMed ID: 29169679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Body mass estimates of the earliest possible hominins and implications for the last common ancestor.
    Grabowski M; Hatala KG; Jungers WL
    J Hum Evol; 2018 Sep; 122():84-92. PubMed ID: 29910044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reevaluation of the body mass estimate for the KNM-ER 5428 Homo erectus talus.
    Cunningham DL; Rogers MV; Wescott DJ; McCarthy RC
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2019 Sep; 170(1):148-155. PubMed ID: 31268179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lower limb articular scaling and body mass estimation in Pliocene and Pleistocene hominins.
    Ruff CB; Burgess ML; Squyres N; Junno JA; Trinkaus E
    J Hum Evol; 2018 Feb; 115():85-111. PubMed ID: 29331230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Morphometric panel regression equations for predicting body mass in immature humans.
    Yapuncich GS; Churchill SE; Cameron N; Walker CS
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 May; 166(1):179-195. PubMed ID: 29369332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Buccal dental microwear texture and catarrhine diets.
    Aliaga-Martínez A; Romero A; Galbany J; Hernández-Aguilar RA; Pérez-Pérez A
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2017 Jul; 163(3):462-473. PubMed ID: 28369731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long bone articular and diaphyseal structure in Old World monkeys and apes. II: Estimation of body mass.
    Ruff CB
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2003 Jan; 120(1):16-37. PubMed ID: 12489135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Allometric patterns of cranial bone thickness in fossil hominids.
    Gauld SC
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1996 Jul; 100(3):411-26. PubMed ID: 8798997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Body mass estimates of hominin fossils and the evolution of human body size.
    Grabowski M; Hatala KG; Jungers WL; Richmond BG
    J Hum Evol; 2015 Aug; 85():75-93. PubMed ID: 26094042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating fossil hominin body mass from cranial variables: an assessment using CT data from modern humans of known body mass.
    Elliott M; Kurki H; Weston DA; Collard M
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2014 Jun; 154(2):201-14. PubMed ID: 24615366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Precision and accuracy of acetabular size measures in fragmentary hominin pelves obtained using sphere-fitting techniques.
    Hammond AS; Plavcan JM; Ward CV
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2013 Apr; 150(4):565-78. PubMed ID: 23389818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Calculating hominin and nonhuman anthropoid femoral head diameter from acetabular size.
    Plavcan JM; Hammond AS; Ward CV
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2014 Nov; 155(3):469-75. PubMed ID: 25137030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can we refine body mass estimations based on femoral head breadth?
    Niskanen M; Junno JA; Maijanen H; Holt B; Sladék V; Berner M
    J Hum Evol; 2018 Feb; 115():112-121. PubMed ID: 29223292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.