433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28476730)
1. Mountain rescue cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a comparison between manual and mechanical chest compressions during manikin cardio resuscitation.
Thomassen O; Skaiaa SC; Assmuss J; Østerås Ø; Heltne JK; Wik L; Brattebo G
Emerg Med J; 2017 Sep; 34(9):573-577. PubMed ID: 28476730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by EMS personnel and assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.
Aufderheide TP; Pirrallo RG; Yannopoulos D; Klein JP; von Briesen C; Sparks CW; Deja KA; Conrad CJ; Kitscha DJ; Provo TA; Lurie KG
Resuscitation; 2005 Mar; 64(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 15733766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rescue under ongoing CPR from an upper floor: evaluation of three different evacuation routes and mechanical and manual chest compressions: a manikin trial.
Drinhaus H; Nüsgen S; Adams N; Wetsch WA; Annecke T
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2020 Mar; 28(1):16. PubMed ID: 32131894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. LUCAS compared to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective during helicopter rescue-a prospective, randomized, cross-over manikin study.
Putzer G; Braun P; Zimmermann A; Pedross F; Strapazzon G; Brugger H; Paal P
Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Feb; 31(2):384-9. PubMed ID: 23000324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Efficacy of LUCAS in Prehospital Cardiac Arrest Scenarios: A Crossover Mannequin Study.
Gyory RA; Buchle SE; Rodgers D; Lubin JS
West J Emerg Med; 2017 Apr; 18(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28435494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transport with ongoing resuscitation: a comparison between manual and mechanical compression.
Gässler H; Ventzke MM; Lampl L; Helm M
Emerg Med J; 2013 Jul; 30(7):589-92. PubMed ID: 22833595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical versus manual chest compression CPR under ground ambulance transport conditions.
Fox J; Fiechter R; Gerstl P; Url A; Wagner H; Lüscher TF; Eriksson U; Wyss CA
Acute Card Care; 2013 Mar; 15(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 23425006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Poor chest compression quality with mechanical compressions in simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized, cross-over manikin study.
Blomberg H; Gedeborg R; Berglund L; Karlsten R; Johansson J
Resuscitation; 2011 Oct; 82(10):1332-7. PubMed ID: 21724317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dispatcher-assisted compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation provides best quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation by laypersons: A randomised controlled single-blinded manikin trial.
Spelten O; Warnecke T; Wetsch WA; Schier R; Böttiger BW; Hinkelbein J
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2016 Aug; 33(8):575-80. PubMed ID: 26908002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality between mechanical compression on reducible stretcher versus manual compression on standard stretcher in small elevator.
Kim TH; Hong KJ; Sang Do S; Kim CH; Song SW; Song KJ; Ro YS; Ahn KO; Jang DB
Am J Emerg Med; 2016 Aug; 34(8):1604-9. PubMed ID: 27318749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on manikins: on the floor and in the bed.
Jäntti H; Silfvast T; Turpeinen A; Kiviniemi V; Uusaro A
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2009 Oct; 53(9):1131-7. PubMed ID: 19388894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rescuer fatigue: standard versus continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Heidenreich JW; Berg RA; Higdon TA; Ewy GA; Kern KB; Sanders AB
Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1020-6. PubMed ID: 17015418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Manual versus Mechanical Chest Compressions on Surfaces of Varying Softness with or without Backboards: A Randomized, Crossover Manikin Study.
Putzer G; Fiala A; Braun P; Neururer S; Biechl K; Keilig B; Ploner W; Fop E; Paal P
J Emerg Med; 2016 Apr; 50(4):594-600.e1. PubMed ID: 26607696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do manual chest compressions provide substantial ventilation during prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation?
Vanwulpen M; Wolfskeil M; Duchatelet C; Hachimi-Idrissi S
Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Jan; 39():129-131. PubMed ID: 33039236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality Comparison of the Manual Chest Compression and the Mechanical Chest Compression During Difficult Transport Conditions.
Bekgöz B; Şan İ; Ergin M
J Emerg Med; 2020 Mar; 58(3):432-438. PubMed ID: 32229137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Chest Compressions Metrics Measured Using the Laerdal Skill Reporter and Q-CPR: A Simulation Study.
Davey P; Whatman C; Dicker B
Simul Healthc; 2015 Oct; 10(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 26426556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by trained laypersons and an assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.
Aufderheide TP; Pirrallo RG; Yannopoulos D; Klein JP; von Briesen C; Sparks CW; Deja KA; Kitscha DJ; Provo TA; Lurie KG
Resuscitation; 2006 Dec; 71(3):341-51. PubMed ID: 17070644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chest Compression Fraction between Mechanical Compressions on a Reducible Stretcher and Manual Compressions on a Standard Stretcher during Transport in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests: The Ambulance Stretcher Innovation of Asian Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ASIA-CPR) Pilot Trial.
Kim TH; Shin SD; Song KJ; Hong KJ; Ro YS; Song SW; Kim CH
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2017; 21(5):636-644. PubMed ID: 28467138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest before and after introduction of a mechanical chest compression device, LUCAS-2; a prospective, observational study.
Tranberg T; Lassen JF; Kaltoft AK; Hansen TM; Stengaard C; Knudsen L; Trautner S; Terkelsen CJ
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2015 Apr; 23():37. PubMed ID: 25898992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of one-rescuer compression/ventilation ratios on cardiopulmonary resuscitation in infant, pediatric, and adult manikins.
Srikantan SK; Berg RA; Cox T; Tice L; Nadkarni VM
Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2005 May; 6(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 15857527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
