129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28477080)
1. Choosing a Doctor: Does Presentation Format Affect the Way Consumers Use Health Care Performance Information?
Kenny P; Goodall S; Street DJ; Greene J
Patient; 2017 Dec; 10(6):739-751. PubMed ID: 28477080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.
Whitty JA; Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Scuffham PA
Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):638-54. PubMed ID: 24713695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA
Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of different graphical and numerical likelihood formats on perception of likelihood and choice.
Oudhoff JP; Timmermans DR
Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):487-500. PubMed ID: 25769496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Exploratory Application of Eye-Tracking Methods in a Discrete Choice Experiment.
Vass C; Rigby D; Tate K; Stewart A; Payne K
Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):658-672. PubMed ID: 30074879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Valuing the extended role of prescribing pharmacist in general practice: results from a discrete choice experiment.
Gerard K; Tinelli M; Latter S; Blenkinsopp A; Smith A
Value Health; 2012; 15(5):699-707. PubMed ID: 22867779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Consumer Decision-Making Based on Review Websites: Are There Differences Between Choosing a Hotel and Choosing a Physician?
Rothenfluh F; Germeni E; Schulz PJ
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Jun; 18(6):e129. PubMed ID: 27311623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Community preferences in general practice: important factors for choosing a general practitioner.
Kenny P; De Abreu Lourenco R; Wong CY; Haas M; Goodall S
Health Expect; 2016 Feb; 19(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 25565251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing Analytic Hierarchy Process and Discrete-Choice Experiment to Elicit Patient Preferences for Treatment Characteristics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Danner M; Vennedey V; Hiligsmann M; Fauser S; Gross C; Stock S
Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1166-1173. PubMed ID: 28964450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consumers' interpretation and use of comparative information on the quality of health care: the effect of presentation approaches.
Damman OC; Hendriks M; Rademakers J; Spreeuwenberg P; Delnoij DM; Groenewegen PP
Health Expect; 2012 Jun; 15(2):197-211. PubMed ID: 21615637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Important features of home-based support services for older Australians and their informal carers.
McCaffrey N; Gill L; Kaambwa B; Cameron ID; Patterson J; Crotty M; Ratcliffe J
Health Soc Care Community; 2015 Nov; 23(6):654-64. PubMed ID: 25660237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Drivers of choice of resuscitation fluid in the intensive care unit: a discrete choice experiment.
Taylor CB; Hammond NE; Laba TL; Watts N; Thompson K; Saxena M; Micallef S; Finfer S; Myburgh J;
Crit Care Resusc; 2017 Jun; 19(2):134-141. PubMed ID: 28651509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigating consumers' and informal carers' views and preferences for consumer directed care: A discrete choice experiment.
Kaambwa B; Lancsar E; McCaffrey N; Chen G; Gill L; Cameron ID; Crotty M; Ratcliffe J
Soc Sci Med; 2015 Sep; 140():81-94. PubMed ID: 26210656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Eliciting patients' preferences for epilepsy diagnostics: a discrete choice experiment.
Wijnen BF; de Kinderen RJ; Colon AJ; Dirksen CD; Essers BA; Hiligsmann M; Leijten FS; Ossenblok PP; Evers SM
Epilepsy Behav; 2014 Feb; 31():102-9. PubMed ID: 24389020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The types and aspects of front-of-pack food labelling schemes preferred by adults and children.
Pettigrew S; Talati Z; Miller C; Dixon H; Kelly B; Ball K
Appetite; 2017 Feb; 109():115-123. PubMed ID: 27894969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Making comparative performance information more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding.
Damman OC; De Jong A; Hibbard JH; Timmermans DR
BMJ Qual Saf; 2016 Nov; 25(11):860-869. PubMed ID: 26543066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Valuing SF-6D Health States Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.
Norman R; Viney R; Brazier J; Burgess L; Cronin P; King M; Ratcliffe J; Street D
Med Decis Making; 2014 Aug; 34(6):773-86. PubMed ID: 24025661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format.
Norman R; Viney R; Aaronson NK; Brazier JE; Cella D; Costa DS; Fayers PM; Kemmler G; Peacock S; Pickard AS; Rowen D; Street DJ; Velikova G; Young TA; King MT
Qual Life Res; 2016 Mar; 25(3):637-49. PubMed ID: 26342928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Communicating quality of care information to physicians: a study of eight presentation formats.
Geraedts M; Hermeling P; de Cruppé W
Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Jun; 87(3):375-82. PubMed ID: 22177585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preferences for the delivery of community pharmacy services to help manage chronic conditions.
Whitty JA; Kendall E; Sav A; Kelly F; McMillan SS; King MA; Wheeler AJ
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2015; 11(2):197-215. PubMed ID: 25116938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
