465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28477342)
1. Estimating patient dose from CT exams that use automatic exposure control: Development and validation of methods to accurately estimate tube current values.
McMillan K; Bostani M; Cagnon CH; Yu L; Leng S; McCollough CH; McNitt-Gray MF
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4262-4275. PubMed ID: 28477342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating Size-Specific Dose Estimate (SSDE) as an estimate of organ doses from routine CT exams derived from Monte Carlo simulations.
Hardy AJ; Bostani M; Kim GHJ; Cagnon CH; Zankl MA; McNitt-Gray M
Med Phys; 2021 Oct; 48(10):6160-6173. PubMed ID: 34309040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The feasibility of a regional CTDIvol to estimate organ dose from tube current modulated CT exams.
Khatonabadi M; Kim HJ; Lu P; McMillan KL; Cagnon CH; DeMarco JJ; McNitt-Gray MF
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051903. PubMed ID: 23635273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attenuation-based size metric for estimating organ dose to patients undergoing tube current modulated CT exams.
Bostani M; McMillan K; Lu P; Kim HJ; Cagnon CH; DeMarco JJ; McNitt-Gray MF
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):958-68. PubMed ID: 25652508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Organ doses from CT localizer radiographs: Development, validation, and application of a Monte Carlo estimation technique.
Hoye J; Sharma S; Zhang Y; Fu W; Ria F; Kapadia A; Segars WP; Wilson J; Samei E
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):5262-5272. PubMed ID: 31442324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of methods to estimate organ doses in CT when utilizing approximations to the tube current modulation function.
Khatonabadi M; Zhang D; Mathieu K; Kim HJ; Lu P; Cody D; Demarco JJ; Cagnon CH; McNitt-Gray MF
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5212-28. PubMed ID: 22894446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reference dataset for benchmarking fetal doses derived from Monte Carlo simulations of CT exams.
Hardy AJ; Bostani M; Angel E; Cagnon C; Sechopoulos I; McNitt-Gray MF
Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):523-532. PubMed ID: 33128259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating organ doses from tube current modulated CT examinations using a generalized linear model.
Bostani M; McMillan K; Lu P; Kim GH; Cody D; Arbique G; Greenberg SB; DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; McNitt-Gray MF
Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1500-1513. PubMed ID: 28112399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A database for estimating organ dose for coronary angiography and brain perfusion CT scans for arbitrary spectra and angular tube current modulation.
Rupcich F; Badal A; Kyprianou I; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5336-46. PubMed ID: 22957601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monte Carlo simulations to assess the effects of tube current modulation on breast dose for multidetector CT.
Angel E; Yaghmai N; Jude CM; Demarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Goldin JG; Primak AN; Stevens DM; Cody DD; McCollough CH; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(3):497-512. PubMed ID: 19124953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean MAS reduction?
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Oikonomou I; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):654-62. PubMed ID: 21673583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating fetal dose from tube current-modulated (TCM) and fixed tube current (FTC) abdominal/pelvis CT examinations.
Hardy AJ; Angel E; Bostani M; Cagnon C; McNitt-Gray M
Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 46(6):2729-2743. PubMed ID: 30893477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation.
Tian X; Li X; Segars WP; Frush DP; Samei E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1575-85. PubMed ID: 25832048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing radiation exposure for CT localizer radiographs.
Bohrer E; Schäfer S; Mäder U; Noël PB; Krombach GA; Fiebich M
Z Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 27(2):145-158. PubMed ID: 27720574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of breast and lung doses from chest CT scans using organ-based tube current modulation (OBTCM) vs. Automatic tube current modulation (ATCM).
Layman RR; Hardy AJ; Kim HJ; Chou EN; Bostani M; Cagnon C; Cody D; McNitt-Gray M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 May; 22(5):97-109. PubMed ID: 33939253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the estimation of organ and effective doses in x-ray computed tomography.
van Straten M; Deak P; Shrimpton PC; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4881-9. PubMed ID: 19994496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Localizer Radiography Projection on Organ Dose at Chest CT with Automatic Tube Current Modulation.
Saltybaeva N; Krauss A; Alkadhi H
Radiology; 2017 Mar; 282(3):842-849. PubMed ID: 27548276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating lung, breast, and effective dose from low-dose lung cancer screening CT exams with tube current modulation across a range of patient sizes.
Hardy AJ; Bostani M; McMillan K; Zankl M; McCollough C; Cagnon C; McNitt-Gray M
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4667-4682. PubMed ID: 30118143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of topogram-based body size indices for CT dose consideration and scan protocol optimization.
Li B; Behrman RH; Norbash AM
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3456-65. PubMed ID: 22755725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The profound effects of patient arm positioning on organ doses from CT procedures calculated using Monte Carlo simulations and deformable phantoms.
Liu H; Gao Y; Ding A; Caracappa PF; Xu XG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 25227436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
