These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28477454)

  • 1. Using the model statement to elicit information and cues to deceit in interpreter-based interviews.
    Vrij A; Leal S; Mann S; Dalton G; Jo E; Shaboltas A; Khaleeva M; Granskaya J; Houston K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jun; 177():44-53. PubMed ID: 28477454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of a model statement on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews.
    Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jun; 207():103080. PubMed ID: 32413731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proportion of complications in interpreter-absent and interpreter-present interviews.
    Vrij A; Leal S
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(1):155-164. PubMed ID: 32284786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of sketching while narrating on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews.
    Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S; Burkhardt J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Feb; 213():103236. PubMed ID: 33360343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Kristen S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 17211691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Amplifying deceivers' flawed metacognition: Encouraging disclosures after delays with a model statement.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Hope L; Mann S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Sep; 200():102935. PubMed ID: 31715443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cues to deception: can complications, common knowledge details, and self-handicapping strategies discriminate between truths, embedded lies and outright lies in an Italian-speaking sample?
    Caso L; Cavagnis L; Vrij A; Palena N
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1128194. PubMed ID: 37179853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Insurance based lie detection: Enhancing the verifiability approach with a model statement component.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Lafferty M; Nahari G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Mar; 174():1-8. PubMed ID: 28088655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Amplifying recall after delays via initial interviewing: Inoculating truth-tellers' memory as a function of encoding quality.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Deeb H; Hope L; Mann S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Sep; 209():103130. PubMed ID: 32683098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unanticipated questions can yield unanticipated outcomes in investigative interviews.
    Parkhouse T; Ormerod TC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208751. PubMed ID: 30532180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: when training to detect deception works.
    Hartwig M; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Kronkvist O
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Oct; 30(5):603-19. PubMed ID: 16977348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using reality monitoring to improve deception detection in the context of the cognitive interview for suspects.
    Logue M; Book AS; Frosina P; Huizinga T; Amos S
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Aug; 39(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 25844516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A stability bias effect among deceivers.
    Harvey AC; Vrij A; Hope L; Leal S; Mann S
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Dec; 41(6):519-529. PubMed ID: 28726439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eliciting cues to false intent: a new application of strategic interviewing.
    Clemens F; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):512-22. PubMed ID: 21170575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detecting false intentions using unanticipated questions.
    Bogaard G; van der Mark J; Meijer EH
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226257. PubMed ID: 31825997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the efficacy of baselining in deception detection: A comparative analysis of the reality interview and structured interview.
    Bogaard G; van de Bovekamp AM; Colwell K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Feb; 242():104112. PubMed ID: 38070326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The inhibitory spillover effect: Controlling the bladder makes better liars.
    Fenn E; Blandón-Gitlin I; Coons J; Pineda C; Echon R
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Dec; 37():112-22. PubMed ID: 26366466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: the benefit of recalling an event in reverse order.
    Vrij A; Mann SA; Fisher RP; Leal S; Milne R; Bull R
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 17694424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statements about true and false intentions: using the Cognitive Interview to magnify the differences.
    Sooniste T; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Vrij A
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Aug; 56(4):371-8. PubMed ID: 25929812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting.
    Ströfer S; Ufkes EG; Noordzij ML; Giebels E
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2016 Sep; 41(3):349-62. PubMed ID: 27193132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.