These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28478291)

  • 1. Expert opinion on risks to the long-term viability of residential recycled water schemes: An Australian study.
    West C; Kenway S; Hassall M; Yuan Z
    Water Res; 2017 Sep; 120():133-145. PubMed ID: 28478291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why do residential recycled water schemes fail? A comprehensive review of risk factors and impact on objectives.
    West C; Kenway S; Hassall M; Yuan Z
    Water Res; 2016 Oct; 102():271-281. PubMed ID: 27362447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Water recycling: a major new initiative for Melbourne--crucial for a sustainable future.
    Arbon M; Ireland M
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(7-8):57-63. PubMed ID: 12793662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Establishing components of community satisfaction with recycled water use through a structural equation model.
    Hurlimann A; Hemphill E; McKay J; Geursen G
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Sep; 88(4):1221-32. PubMed ID: 17662519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fluorescence monitoring at a recycled water treatment plant and associated dual distribution system--implications for cross-connection detection.
    Hambly AC; Henderson RK; Storey MV; Baker A; Stuetz RM; Khan SJ
    Water Res; 2010 Oct; 44(18):5323-33. PubMed ID: 20655084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stakeholder evaluations of risk interventions for non-potable recycled water schemes: A case study.
    Goodwin D; Raffin M; Jeffrey P; Smith HM
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jul; 674():439-450. PubMed ID: 31005845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current status of recycled water for agricultural irrigation in Australia, potential opportunities and areas of emerging concern.
    Radcliffe JC
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 807(Pt 2):151676. PubMed ID: 34798087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comprehensive framework for the assessment of new end uses in recycled water schemes.
    Chen Z; Ngo HH; Guo W; Lim R; Wang XC; O'Halloran K; Listowski A; Corby N; Miechel C
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 470-471():44-52. PubMed ID: 24128817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Urban Australians using recycled water for domestic non-potable use--an evaluation of the attributes price, saltiness, colour and odour using conjoint analysis.
    Hurlimann A; McKay J
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Apr; 83(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 16678338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recycled water and human health effects.
    O'Toole J; Leder K; Sinclair M
    Aust Fam Physician; 2007 Dec; 36(12):998-1000. PubMed ID: 18075621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decline in recycled water quality during short-term storage in open ponds.
    Higgins J; Warnken J; Teasdale PR; Arthur JM
    J Water Health; 2009 Dec; 7(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19590127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vision and perception of community on the use of recycled water for household laundry: a case study in Australia.
    Mainali B; Pham TT; Ngo HH; Guo W; Miechel C; O'Halloran K; Muthukaruppan M; Listowski A
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Oct; 463-464():657-66. PubMed ID: 23842537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modelling the future impacts of urban spatial planning on the viability of alternative water supply.
    Hargreaves AJ; Farmani R; Ward S; Butler D
    Water Res; 2019 Oct; 162():200-213. PubMed ID: 31276984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Providing information promotes greater public support for potable recycled water.
    Fielding KS; Roiko AH
    Water Res; 2014 Sep; 61():86-96. PubMed ID: 24893113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The adoption of the Australian Water Recycling Guidelines by regulators with specific reference to treatment validation requirements.
    Power KN
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(8):1735-44. PubMed ID: 20962388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Drivers for and against municipal wastewater recycling: a review.
    Kunz NC; Fischer M; Ingold K; Hering JG
    Water Sci Technol; 2016; 73(2):251-9. PubMed ID: 26819379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Social trust, risk perceptions and public acceptance of recycled water: testing a social-psychological model.
    Ross VL; Fielding KS; Louis WR
    J Environ Manage; 2014 May; 137():61-8. PubMed ID: 24603028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of social attitude to the new end use of recycled water for household laundry in Australia by the regression models.
    Chen Z; Ngo HH; Guo W; Wang XC; Miechel C; Corby N; Listowski A; O'Halloran K
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Sep; 126():79-84. PubMed ID: 23666073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using QMRA-based regulation as a water quality management tool in the water security challenge: experience from the Netherlands and Australia.
    Bichai F; Smeets PW
    Water Res; 2013 Dec; 47(20):7315-26. PubMed ID: 24184021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Informing public attitudes to non-potable water reuse - The impact of message framing.
    Goodwin D; Raffin M; Jeffrey P; Smith HM
    Water Res; 2018 Nov; 145():125-135. PubMed ID: 30125815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.