These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28478570)

  • 1. On the Eye Movement Control of Changing Reading Direction for a Single Word: The Case of Reading Numerals in Urdu.
    Khan A; Loberg O; Hautala J
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Oct; 46(5):1273-1283. PubMed ID: 28478570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reading direction and the central perceptual span in Urdu and English.
    Paterson KB; McGowan VA; White SJ; Malik S; Abedipour L; Jordan TR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88358. PubMed ID: 24586316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preview benefit during eye fixations in reading for older and younger readers.
    Rayner K; Castelhano MS; Yang J
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Sep; 25(3):714-8. PubMed ID: 20853974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Size of saccade and fixation duration of eye movements during reading: psychophysics of Japanese text processing.
    Osaka N
    J Opt Soc Am A; 1992 Jan; 9(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 1738050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading.
    Drieghe D; Rayner K; Pollatsek A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Aug; 61(8):1239-49. PubMed ID: 17853202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Saccadic context indicates information processing within visual fixations: evidence from event-related potentials and eye-movements analysis of the distractor effect.
    Graupner ST; Pannasch S; Velichkovsky BM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Apr; 80(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 21291920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Saccades and fixations in children with delayed reading skills.
    Vinuela-Navarro V; Erichsen JT; Williams C; Woodhouse JM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):531-541. PubMed ID: 28656674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lateralization of posterior alpha EEG reflects the distribution of spatial attention during saccadic reading.
    Kornrumpf B; Dimigen O; Sommer W
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Jun; 54(6):809-823. PubMed ID: 28240816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inhibition of saccade return in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz B; Ashby J; Clifton C
    Vision Res; 2003 Apr; 43(9):1027-34. PubMed ID: 12676245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A biologically realistic cortical model of eye movement control in reading.
    Heinzle J; Hepp K; Martin KA
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Jul; 117(3):808-30. PubMed ID: 20658854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of word length on eye movement control: The evidence from Arabic.
    Paterson KB; Almabruk AA; McGowan VA; White SJ; Jordan TR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1443-50. PubMed ID: 25690581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of foveal and parafoveal masks on the eye movements of older and younger readers.
    Rayner K; Yang J; Schuett S; Slattery TJ
    Psychol Aging; 2014 Jun; 29(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 24730466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Return-sweep saccades during reading in adults and children.
    Parker AJ; Slattery TJ; Kirkby JA
    Vision Res; 2019 Feb; 155():35-43. PubMed ID: 30625336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An examination of binocular reading fixations based on sentence corpus data.
    Nuthmann A; Kliegl R
    J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):31.1-28. PubMed ID: 19757909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Child readers' eye movements in reading Thai.
    Kasisopa B; Reilly RG; Luksaneeyanawin S; Burnham D
    Vision Res; 2016 Jun; 123():8-19. PubMed ID: 27137836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parafoveal magnification: visual acuity does not modulate the perceptual span in reading.
    Miellet S; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jun; 20(6):721-8. PubMed ID: 19470124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations.
    Slattery TJ; Parker AJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1948-1957. PubMed ID: 31325039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: a study with fixation-related brain potentials.
    Dimigen O; Kliegl R; Sommer W
    Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):381-93. PubMed ID: 22521255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reading numbers is harder than reading words: An eye-tracking study.
    de Chambrier AF; Pedrotti M; Ruggeri P; Dewi J; Atzemian M; Thevenot C; Martinet C; Terrier P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 Jul; 237():103942. PubMed ID: 37210866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.