BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28478613)

  • 1. Ki67 expression in invasive breast cancer: the use of tissue microarrays compared with whole tissue sections.
    Muftah AA; Aleskandarany MA; Al-Kaabi MM; Sonbul SN; Diez-Rodriguez M; Nolan CC; Caldas C; Ellis IO; Rakha EA; Green AR
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jul; 164(2):341-348. PubMed ID: 28478613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prognostic value of ki-67 in breast carcinoma: tissue microarray method versus whole section analysis- potentials and pitfalls.
    Dedić Plavetić N; Jakić-Razumović J; Kulić A; Sirotković-Skerlev M; Barić M; Vrbanec D
    Pathol Oncol Res; 2015 Apr; 21(2):315-24. PubMed ID: 25096394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Ki67 expression across distinct categories of breast cancer specimens: a population-based study of matched surgical specimens, core needle biopsies and tissue microarrays.
    Knutsvik G; Stefansson IM; Aziz S; Arnes J; Eide J; Collett K; Akslen LA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112121. PubMed ID: 25375149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of current prognostic and predictive markers in breast cancer: a validation study of tissue microarrays.
    Batistatou A; Televantou D; Bobos M; Eleftheraki AG; Kouvaras E; Chrisafi S; Koukoulis GK; Malamou-Mitsi V; Fountzilas G
    Anticancer Res; 2013 May; 33(5):2139-45. PubMed ID: 23645767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ki67--An unsuitable marker of gastric cancer prognosis unmasks intratumoral heterogeneity.
    Böger C; Behrens HM; Röcken C
    J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jan; 113(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 26709194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital imaging in the immunohistochemical evaluation of the proliferation markers Ki67, MCM2 and Geminin, in early breast cancer, and their putative prognostic value.
    Joshi S; Watkins J; Gazinska P; Brown JP; Gillett CE; Grigoriadis A; Pinder SE
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Jul; 15():546. PubMed ID: 26205655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association of GATA3, P53, Ki67 status and vascular peritumoral invasion are strongly prognostic in luminal breast cancer.
    Jacquemier J; Charafe-Jauffret E; Monville F; Esterni B; Extra JM; Houvenaeghel G; Xerri L; Bertucci F; Birnbaum D
    Breast Cancer Res; 2009; 11(2):R23. PubMed ID: 19405945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of tissue sampling on accuracy of Ki67 immunohistochemistry evaluation in breast cancer.
    Besusparis J; Plancoulaine B; Rasmusson A; Augulis R; Green AR; Ellis IO; Laurinaviciene A; Herlin P; Laurinavicius A
    Diagn Pathol; 2016 Aug; 11(1):82. PubMed ID: 27576949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ki67 and cyclin A as prognostic factors in early breast cancer. What are the optimal cut-off values?
    Ahlin C; Aaltonen K; Amini RM; Nevanlinna H; Fjällskog ML; Blomqvist C
    Histopathology; 2007 Oct; 51(4):491-8. PubMed ID: 17711446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of Ki67 expression for breast cancer subtype classification and prognosis in the Nurses' Health Study.
    Healey MA; Hirko KA; Beck AH; Collins LC; Schnitt SJ; Eliassen AH; Holmes MD; Tamimi RM; Hazra A
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(2):613-622. PubMed ID: 28791482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of immunohistochemistry with PCR for assessment of ER, PR, and Ki-67 and prediction of pathological complete response in breast cancer.
    Sinn HP; Schneeweiss A; Keller M; Schlombs K; Laible M; Seitz J; Lakis S; Veltrup E; Altevogt P; Eidt S; Wirtz RM; Marmé F
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Feb; 17(1):124. PubMed ID: 28193205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of Ki67 visual scoring app compared to eyeball estimate and digital image analysis and its prognostic significance in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.
    Arun I; Venkatesh S; Ahmed R; Agrawal SK; Leung SCY
    APMIS; 2021 Aug; 129(8):489-502. PubMed ID: 34053140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic value of automated KI67 scoring in breast cancer: a centralised evaluation of 8088 patients from 10 study groups.
    Abubakar M; Orr N; Daley F; Coulson P; Ali HR; Blows F; Benitez J; Milne R; Brenner H; Stegmaier C; Mannermaa A; Chang-Claude J; Rudolph A; Sinn P; Couch FJ; Devilee P; Tollenaar RA; Seynaeve C; Figueroa J; Sherman ME; Lissowska J; Hewitt S; Eccles D; Hooning MJ; Hollestelle A; Martens JW; van Deurzen CH; ; Bolla MK; Wang Q; Jones M; Schoemaker M; Wesseling J; van Leeuwen FE; Van 't Veer L; Easton D; Swerdlow AJ; Dowsett M; Pharoah PD; Schmidt MK; Garcia-Closas M
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Oct; 18(1):104. PubMed ID: 27756439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Piwil2 is expressed in various stages of breast cancers and has the potential to be used as a novel biomarker.
    Liu JJ; Shen R; Chen L; Ye Y; He G; Hua K; Jarjoura D; Nakano T; Ramesh GK; Shapiro CL; Barsky SH; Gao JX
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2010 Mar; 3(4):328-37. PubMed ID: 20490325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ki-67 Expression in Breast Cancer Tissue Microarrays: Assessing Tumor Heterogeneity, Concordance With Full Section, and Scoring Methods.
    Khoury T; Zirpoli G; Cohen SM; Geradts J; Omilian A; Davis W; Bshara W; Miller R; Mathews MM; Troester M; Palmer JR; Ambrosone CB
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2017 Aug; 148(2):108-118. PubMed ID: 28898983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the prognostic value of genomic grade index, Ki67 expression and mitotic activity index in early node-positive breast cancer patients.
    Bertucci F; Finetti P; Roche H; Le Doussal JM; Marisa L; Martin AL; Lacroix-Triki M; Blanc-Fournier C; Jacquemier J; Peyro-Saint-Paul H; Viens P; Sotiriou C; Birnbaum D; Penault-Llorca F
    Ann Oncol; 2013 Mar; 24(3):625-32. PubMed ID: 23117074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic relevance of Ki67 expression in primary male breast cancer: determination of cut-off points by different evaluation methods and statistical examinations.
    Erices-Leclercq M; Lubig S; Förster F; Förster R; Baldus S; Rudlowski C; Schröder L
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2022 Feb; 148(2):441-447. PubMed ID: 33991247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of intratumoural heterogeneity on the assessment of Ki67 expression in breast cancer.
    Aleskandarany MA; Green AR; Ashankyty I; Elmouna A; Diez-Rodriguez M; Nolan CC; Ellis IO; Rakha EA
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jul; 158(2):287-95. PubMed ID: 27380874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrated tumor identification and automated scoring minimizes pathologist involvement and provides new insights to key biomarkers in breast cancer.
    Bankhead P; Fernández JA; McArt DG; Boyle DP; Li G; Loughrey MB; Irwin GW; Harkin DP; James JA; McQuaid S; Salto-Tellez M; Hamilton PW
    Lab Invest; 2018 Jan; 98(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 29251737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ki67 levels as predictive and prognostic parameters in pretherapeutic breast cancer core biopsies: a translational investigation in the neoadjuvant GeparTrio trial.
    Denkert C; Loibl S; Müller BM; Eidtmann H; Schmitt WD; Eiermann W; Gerber B; Tesch H; Hilfrich J; Huober J; Fehm T; Barinoff J; Jackisch C; Prinzler J; Rüdiger T; Erbstösser E; Blohmer JU; Budczies J; Mehta KM; von Minckwitz G
    Ann Oncol; 2013 Nov; 24(11):2786-93. PubMed ID: 23970015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.