306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28478744)
1. Which Flexible Ureteroscopes (Digital vs. Fiber-Optic) Can Easily Reach the Difficult Lower Pole Calices and Have Better End-Tip Deflection: In Vitro Study on K-Box. A PETRA Evaluation.
Dragos LB; Somani BK; Sener ET; Buttice S; Proietti S; Ploumidis A; Iacoboaie CT; Doizi S; Traxer O
J Endourol; 2017 Jul; 31(7):630-637. PubMed ID: 28478744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of laser fiber passage in ureteroscopic maximum deflection and their influence on deflection and irrigation: Do we really need the ball tip concept?
Baghdadi M; Emiliani E; Talso M; Servián P; Barreiro A; Orosa A; Proietti S; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2017 Feb; 35(2):313-318. PubMed ID: 27300338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characteristics of current digital single-use flexible ureteroscopes versus their reusable counterparts: an
Dragos LB; Somani BK; Keller EX; De Coninck VMJ; Herrero MR; Kamphuis GM; Bres-Niewada E; Sener ET; Doizi S; Wiseman OJ; Traxer O
Transl Androl Urol; 2019 Sep; 8(Suppl 4):S359-S370. PubMed ID: 31656742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model.
Proietti S; Dragos L; Molina W; Doizi S; Giusti G; Traxer O
J Endourol; 2016 Jun; 30(6):655-9. PubMed ID: 27084572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The "Body Mass Index" of Flexible Ureteroscopes.
Proietti S; Somani B; Sofer M; Pietropaolo A; Rosso M; Saitta G; Gaboardi F; Traxer O; Giusti G
J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1090-1095. PubMed ID: 28835120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Flexible Ureterorenoscope Quality of Vision: An In Vitro Study.
Talso M; Proietti S; Emiliani E; Gallioli A; Dragos L; Orosa A; Servian P; Barreiro A; Giusti G; Montanari E; Somani B; Traxer O
J Endourol; 2018 Jun; 32(6):523-528. PubMed ID: 29562765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In Vitro Evaluation of Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Practical Comparison for a Patient-Centered Approach.
Marchini GS; Batagello CA; Monga M; Torricelli FCM; Vicentini FC; Danilovic A; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):184-191. PubMed ID: 29239229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Next-Generation Single-Use Ureteroscopes: An In Vitro Comparison.
Tom WR; Wollin DA; Jiang R; Radvak D; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1301-1306. PubMed ID: 28978227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a Novel Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope.
Dale J; Kaplan AG; Radvak D; Shin R; Ackerman A; Chen T; Scales CD; Ferrandino MN; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):903-907. PubMed ID: 27981862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A new era: performance and limitations of the latest models of flexible ureteroscopes.
Multescu R; Geavlete B; Geavlete P
Urology; 2013 Dec; 82(6):1236-9. PubMed ID: 23992972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single-use
Bragaru M; Multescu R; Georgescu D; Bulai C; Ene C; Popescu R; Geavlete P; Geavlete B
J Med Life; 2023 Jan; 16(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 36873117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Effect of Ratio of Endoscope-Sheath Diameter on Intrapelvic Pressure During Flexible Ureteroscopic Lasertripsy.
Fang L; Xie G; Zheng Z; Liu W; Zhu J; Huang T; Lu Y; Cheng Y
J Endourol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):132-139. PubMed ID: 30595058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser fragmentation for renal stones: comparison between digital and conventional ureteroscope.
Somani BK; Al-Qahtani SM; de Medina SD; Traxer O
Urology; 2013 Nov; 82(5):1017-9. PubMed ID: 24001703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intrarenal manipulation of flexible ureteroscopes: a comparative study.
Monga M; Weiland D; Pedro RN; Lynch AC; Anderson K
BJU Int; 2007 Jul; 100(1):157-9. PubMed ID: 17552963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
Kim DH; Shin JH; Choi SY; You D; Kim CS; Park HK
Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Sep; 59(5):328-334. PubMed ID: 30182078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of flexible ureteroscopes: deflection, irrigant flow and optical characteristics.
Abdelshehid C; Ahlering MT; Chou D; Park HK; Basillote J; Lee D; Kim I; Eichel L; Protsenko D; Wong B; McDougall E; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):2017-21. PubMed ID: 15879808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Novel Flexible Ureteroscope with Omnidirectional Bending Tip Using Joystick-Type Control Unit (URF-Y0016): Initial Validation Study in Bench Models.
Tambo M; Inoue T; Miura H; Matsuzaki J; Nutahara K; Hamamoto S; Okada S; Fukuhara H; Fujisawa M; Matsuda T
J Endourol; 2020 Jun; 34(6):676-681. PubMed ID: 31984760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Novel Ball-Tip Holmium Laser Fiber: Impact on Ureteroscope Performance and Fragmentation Efficiency.
Shin RH; Lautz JM; Cabrera FJ; Shami CJ; Goldsmith ZG; Kuntz NJ; Kaplan AG; Neisius A; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2016 Feb; 30(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 26472696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.
Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Sherer BA; Metzler I; Isaacson D; Stoller ML; Chi T
J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 29239227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
