These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28479551)

  • 1. Classifying Drivers' Cognitive Load Using EEG Signals.
    Barua S; Ahmed MU; Begum S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 237():99-106. PubMed ID: 28479551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of Drivers' Mental Workload by Multimodal Measures during Auditory-Based Dual-Task Driving Scenarios.
    Huang J; Zhang Q; Zhang T; Wang T; Tao D
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Feb; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 38339758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The interaction of cognitive load and attention-directing cues in driving.
    Lee YC; Lee JD; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2009 Jun; 51(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 19750791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EEG alpha spindles and prolonged brake reaction times during auditory distraction in an on-road driving study.
    Sonnleitner A; Treder MS; Simon M; Willmann S; Ewald A; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():110-8. PubMed ID: 24144496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual attention in driving: the effects of cognitive load and visual disruption.
    Lee YC; Lee JD; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2007 Aug; 49(4):721-33. PubMed ID: 17702223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Drivers' Cue Utilization Predicts Cognitive Resource Consumption During a Simulated Driving Scenario.
    Sturman D; Wiggins MW
    Hum Factors; 2021 May; 63(3):402-414. PubMed ID: 31721607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of cognitive load on drivers' State and task performance during automated driving: Introducing a novel method for determining stabilisation time following take-over of control.
    Melnicuk V; Thompson S; Jennings P; Birrell S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 151():105967. PubMed ID: 33444868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of cognitively demanding dual-task driving condition on elderly people's driving performance; Real driving monitoring.
    Ebnali M; Ahmadnezhad P; Shateri A; Mazloumi A; Ebnali Heidari M; Nazeri AR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Sep; 94():198-206. PubMed ID: 27328019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An exploratory study of drivers' EEG response during emergent collision avoidance.
    Li X; Yang L; Yan X
    J Safety Res; 2022 Sep; 82():241-250. PubMed ID: 36031251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monitoring drivers' mental workload in driving simulators using physiological measures.
    Brookhuis KA; de Waard D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 May; 42(3):898-903. PubMed ID: 20380918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Driving behaviour while self-regulating mobile phone interactions: A human-machine system approach.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Demmel S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():253-262. PubMed ID: 29653674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examination of drivers' cell phone use behavior at intersections by using naturalistic driving data.
    Xiong H; Bao S; Sayer J; Kato K
    J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():89-93. PubMed ID: 26403907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changing drivers' attitudes towards mobile phone use through participative simulation testing and feedback.
    Wang Y; Zhang W; Lesch MF; Horrey WJ; Chen C; Wu S
    Inj Prev; 2009 Dec; 15(6):384-9. PubMed ID: 19959730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lane keeping under cognitive load: performance changes and mechanisms.
    He J; McCarley JS; Kramer AF
    Hum Factors; 2014 Mar; 56(2):414-26. PubMed ID: 24689258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Driving context influences drivers' decision to engage in visual-manual phone tasks: Evidence from a naturalistic driving study.
    Tivesten E; Dozza M
    J Safety Res; 2015 Jun; 53():87-96. PubMed ID: 25934001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examining the effects of an eco-driving message on driver distraction.
    Rouzikhah H; King M; Rakotonirainy A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():975-83. PubMed ID: 22910188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jul; 92():230-9. PubMed ID: 27107472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effect of Secondary Task Engagement on Adolescents' Driving Performance and Crash Risk.
    Klauer SG; Ehsani JP; McGehee DV; Manser M
    J Adolesc Health; 2015 Jul; 57(1 Suppl):S36-43. PubMed ID: 26112736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing Chinese coach drivers' fitness to drive: The development of a toolkit based on cognition measurements.
    Wang H; Mo X; Wang Y; Liu R; Qiu P; Dai J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt B):395-404. PubMed ID: 26463880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling cognitive load effects of conversation between a passenger and driver.
    Tillman G; Strayer D; Eidels A; Heathcote A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1795-1803. PubMed ID: 28537009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.