175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28479873)
1. Comparison of surface dose delivered by 7 MV-unflattened and 6 MV-flattened photon beams.
Sigamani A; Nambiraj A
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2017; 22(3):243-250. PubMed ID: 28479873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surface dose measurements and comparison of unflattened and flattened photon beams.
Sigamani A; Nambiraj A; Yadav G; Giribabu A; Srinivasan K; Gurusamy V; Raman K; Karunakaran K; Thiyagarajan R
J Med Phys; 2016; 41(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 27217619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Beam characteristics of energy-matched flattening filter free beams.
Paynter D; Weston SJ; Cosgrove VP; Evans JA; Thwaites DI
Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):052103. PubMed ID: 24784392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SU-E-T-151: Effect of Surface Dose and Depth of Maximum Dose with Physical Wedge Filters for 6MV Flattened and 7MV Unflattened Photon Beams.
Ashokkumar S; Sinha SN; Yadav G; Raman K; Thiyagarajan R; Nambiraj NA
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part12):3737-3738. PubMed ID: 28517808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement and comparison of head scatter factor for 7 MV unflattened (FFF) and 6 MV flattened photon beam using indigenously designed columnar mini phantom.
Ashokkumar S; Nambiraj A; Sinha SN; Yadav G; Raman K; Bhushan M; Thiyagarajan R
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2015; 20(3):170-80. PubMed ID: 25949220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MO-A-BRB-02: Facts and Fiction of Flattening Filter Free (FF-FFF) X-Rays Beams.
Ting J
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part20):3861-3862. PubMed ID: 28517518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Measurement of peak correction factor of Farmer chamber for calibration of flattening filter free (FFF) clinical photon beams].
Kontra G; Major T; Polgár C
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 26035159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Head Scatter Factor for 6MV and 10MV flattened (FB) and Unflattened (FFF) Photon Beam using indigenously Designed Columnar Mini Phantom.
Ashokkumar S; Nambi Raj NA; Sinha SN; Yadav G; Thiyagarajan R; Raman K; Mishra MB
J Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 39(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 25190997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Commissioning and dosimetric characteristics of TrueBeam system: composite data of three TrueBeam machines.
Chang Z; Wu Q; Adamson J; Ren L; Bowsher J; Yan H; Thomas A; Yin FF
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6981-7018. PubMed ID: 23127092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surface dose variations in 6 and 10 MV flattened and flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams.
Cashmore J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):293-307. PubMed ID: 27685127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surface dose investigation of the flattening filter-free photon beams.
Wang Y; Khan MK; Ting JY; Easterling SB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jun; 83(2):e281-5. PubMed ID: 22414287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ion recombination corrections of ionization chambers in flattening filter-free photon radiation.
Wang Y; Easterling SB; Ting JY
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 13(5):3758. PubMed ID: 22955642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SU-E-T-415: Evaluation of the Effect of the Dose Buildup Region for Flattening Filter Free Beams in IMRT Plans of Lung and Sinuses.
Chanyavanich V; Siddiqi A; Elder E; Dhabaan A
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part16):3800. PubMed ID: 28517209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. SU-E-T-149: Scatter Factors Comparison of 6MV Flattened and 7MV Unflattened Beams.
Ashokkumar S; Sinha SN; Yadav G; Raman K; Thiyagarajan R; Nambiraj NA
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part12):3737. PubMed ID: 28517836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A surface energy spectral study on the bone heterogeneity and beam obliquity using the flattened and unflattened photon beams.
Chow JC; Owrangi AM
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2016; 21(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 26900360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Field correction factors for a PTW-31016 Pinpoint ionization chamber for both flattened and unflattened beams. Study of the main sources of uncertainties.
Puxeu-Vaqué J; Duch MA; Nailon WH; Cruz Lizuain M; Ginjaume M
Med Phys; 2017 May; 44(5):1930-1938. PubMed ID: 28261817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characteristics of flattening filter free beams at low monitor unit settings.
Akino Y; Ota S; Inoue S; Mizuno H; Sumida I; Yoshioka Y; Isohashi F; Ogawa K
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):112101. PubMed ID: 24320454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo comparison of superficial dose between flattening filter free and flattened beams.
Javedan K; Feygelman V; Zhang RR; Moros EG; Correa CR; Trotti A; Li W; Zhang GG
Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 24662096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental investigation of the response of an a-Si EPID to an unflattened photon beam from an Elekta Precise linear accelerator.
Tyner E; McClean B; McCavana P; af Wetterstedt S
Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1318-29. PubMed ID: 19472639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of phantom scatter from flattened and flattening filter free high-energy photon beams.
Richmond N; Allen V; Daniel J; Dacey R; Walker C
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 25454113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
