BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28479989)

  • 1. A novel method for estimating the strength of positive mating preference by similarity in the wild.
    Fernández-Meirama M; Estévez D; Ng TPT; Williams GA; Carvajal-Rodríguez A; Rolán-Alvarez E
    Ecol Evol; 2017 May; 7(9):2883-2893. PubMed ID: 28479989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The scale-of-choice effect and how estimates of assortative mating in the wild can be biased due to heterogeneous samples.
    Rolán-Alvarez E; Carvajal-Rodríguez A; de Coo A; Cortés B; Estévez D; Ferreira M; González R; Briscoe AD
    Evolution; 2015 Jul; 69(7):1845-57. PubMed ID: 26085130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of the strength of mate preference from mated pairs observed in the wild.
    Clancey E; Johnson TR; Harmon LJ; Hohenlohe PA
    Evolution; 2022 Jan; 76(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 34792183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assortative Mating in Animals and Its Role for Speciation.
    Janicke T; Marie-Orleach L; Aubier TG; Perrier C; Morrow EH
    Am Nat; 2019 Dec; 194(6):865-875. PubMed ID: 31738105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rarity of Size-Assortative Mating in Animals: Assessing the Evidence with Anuran Amphibians.
    Green DM
    Am Nat; 2019 Feb; 193(2):279-295. PubMed ID: 30720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does divergent selection predict the evolution of mate preference and reproductive isolation in the tropical butterfly genus Melinaea (Nymphalidae: Ithomiini)?
    McClure M; Mahrouche L; Houssin C; Monllor M; Le Poul Y; Frérot B; Furtos A; Elias M
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Jun; 88(6):940-952. PubMed ID: 30873614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mate Choice versus Mate Preference: Inferences about Color-Assortative Mating Differ between Field and Lab Assays of Poison Frog Behavior.
    Yang Y; Blomenkamp S; Dugas MB; Richards-Zawacki CL; Pröhl H
    Am Nat; 2019 Apr; 193(4):598-607. PubMed ID: 30912970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assortative mating in space and time: patterns and biases.
    Rios Moura R; Oliveira Gonzaga M; Silva Pinto N; Vasconcellos-Neto J; Requena GS
    Ecol Lett; 2021 May; 24(5):1089-1102. PubMed ID: 33617134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive speciation when assortative mating is based on female preference for male marker traits.
    Doebeli M
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Nov; 18(6):1587-600. PubMed ID: 16313470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test.
    Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 26970522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assortative mating in animals.
    Jiang Y; Bolnick DI; Kirkpatrick M
    Am Nat; 2013 Jun; 181(6):E125-38. PubMed ID: 23669548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MHC class II-assortative mate choice in European badgers (Meles meles).
    Sin YW; Annavi G; Newman C; Buesching C; Burke T; Macdonald DW; Dugdale HL
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Jun; 24(12):3138-50. PubMed ID: 25913367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patterns of MHC-dependent mate selection in humans and nonhuman primates: a meta-analysis.
    Winternitz J; Abbate JL; Huchard E; Havlíček J; Garamszegi LZ
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Jan; 26(2):668-688. PubMed ID: 27859823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
    Muniz DG; Machado G
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The dilemma of Fisherian sexual selection: mate choice for indirect benefits despite rarity and overall weakness of trait-preference genetic correlation.
    Greenfield MD; Alem S; Limousin D; Bailey NW
    Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3524-36. PubMed ID: 25308282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolution of disassortative and assortative mating preferences based on imprinting.
    Ihara Y; Feldman MW
    Theor Popul Biol; 2003 Sep; 64(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 12948680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MateSim: Monte Carlo simulation for the generation of mating tables.
    Carvajal-Rodríguez A
    Biosystems; 2018 Sep; 171():26-30. PubMed ID: 30005998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanisms of Assortative Mating in Speciation with Gene Flow: Connecting Theory and Empirical Research.
    Kopp M; Servedio MR; Mendelson TC; Safran RJ; Rodríguez RL; Hauber ME; Scordato EC; Symes LB; Balakrishnan CN; Zonana DM; van Doorn GS
    Am Nat; 2018 Jan; 191(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 29244561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scrutinizing assortative mating in birds.
    Wang D; Forstmeier W; Valcu M; Dingemanse NJ; Bulla M; Both C; Duckworth RA; Kiere LM; Karell P; Albrecht T; Kempenaers B
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Feb; 17(2):e3000156. PubMed ID: 30789896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple mating reveals complex patterns of assortative mating by personality and body size.
    Montiglio PO; Wey TW; Chang AT; Fogarty S; Sih A
    J Anim Ecol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):125-35. PubMed ID: 26332682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.