218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28480490)
1. Impact of shipping emissions on ozone levels over Europe: assessing the relative importance of the Standard Nomenclature for Air Pollution (SNAP) categories.
Tagaris E; Stergiou I; Sotiropoulou RP
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jun; 24(17):14903-14909. PubMed ID: 28480490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The contribution from shipping emissions to air quality and acid deposition in Europe.
Derwent RG; Stevenson DS; Doherty RM; Collins WJ; Sanderson MG; Johnson CE; Cofala J; Mechler R; Amann M; Dentener FJ
Ambio; 2005 Feb; 34(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 15789519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How important are maritime emissions for the air quality: At European and national scale.
Monteiro A; Russo M; Gama C; Borrego C
Environ Pollut; 2018 Nov; 242(Pt A):565-575. PubMed ID: 30014934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Local Arctic air pollution: Sources and impacts.
Law KS; Roiger A; Thomas JL; Marelle L; Raut JC; Dalsøren S; Fuglestvedt J; Tuccella P; Weinzierl B; Schlager H
Ambio; 2017 Dec; 46(Suppl 3):453-463. PubMed ID: 29076019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of anthropogenic and biogenic emissions on surface ozone concentrations in Istanbul.
Im U; Poupkou A; Incecik S; Markakis K; Kindap T; Unal A; Melas D; Yenigun O; Topcu S; Odman MT; Tayanc M; Guler M
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Mar; 409(7):1255-65. PubMed ID: 21257192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lower air pollution during COVID-19 lock-down: improving models and methods estimating ozone impacts on crops.
Dentener F; Emberson L; Galmarini S; Cappelli G; Irimescu A; Mihailescu D; Van Dingenen R; van den Berg M
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2020 Oct; 378(2183):20200188. PubMed ID: 32981442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of biogenic emissions with satellite-derived land use and land cover data for air quality modeling of Houston-Galveston ozone nonattainment area.
Byun DW; Kim S; Czader B; Nowak D; Stetson S; Estes M
J Environ Manage; 2005 Jun; 75(4):285-301. PubMed ID: 15854724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of ship emissions on NO
Ledoux F; Roche C; Cazier F; Beaugard C; Courcot D
J Environ Sci (China); 2018 Sep; 71():56-66. PubMed ID: 30195690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the manageable portion of ground-level ozone in the contiguous United States.
Luo H; Astitha M; Rao ST; Hogrefe C; Mathur R
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 Nov; 70(11):1136-1147. PubMed ID: 32749924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of shipping emissions on air pollution and pollutant deposition over the Barents Sea.
Raut JC; Law KS; Onishi T; Daskalakis N; Marelle L
Environ Pollut; 2022 Apr; 298():118832. PubMed ID: 35033620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Impact of Individual Anthropogenic Emissions Sectors on the Global Burden of Human Mortality due to Ambient Air Pollution.
Silva RA; Adelman Z; Fry MM; West JJ
Environ Health Perspect; 2016 Nov; 124(11):1776-1784. PubMed ID: 27177206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contributions of natural emissions to ozone and PM2.5 as simulated by the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model.
Mueller SF; Mallard JW
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jun; 45(11):4817-23. PubMed ID: 21545154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of emissions-driven changes in the oxidation capacity of the atmosphere in Europe.
Jung D; de la Paz D; Notario A; Borge R
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 827():154126. PubMed ID: 35219666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Aerosol and ozone observations during six cruise campaigns across the Mediterranean basin: temporal, spatial, and seasonal variability.
Bencardino MM; Pirrone NN; Sprovieri FF
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2014 Mar; 21(6):4044-62. PubMed ID: 24151024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of air emissions from shipping on marine phytoplankton growth.
Zhang C; Shi Z; Zhao J; Zhang Y; Yu Y; Mu Y; Yao X; Feng L; Zhang F; Chen Y; Liu X; Shi J; Gao H
Sci Total Environ; 2021 May; 769():145488. PubMed ID: 33736263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of shipping emissions on four ports of Portugal.
Nunes RAO; Alvim-Ferraz MCM; Martins FG; Sousa SIV
Environ Pollut; 2017 Dec; 231(Pt 2):1370-1379. PubMed ID: 28917818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biogenic emissions of isoprenoids and NO in China and comparison to anthropogenic emissions.
Tie X; Li G; Ying Z; Guenther A; Madronich S
Sci Total Environ; 2006 Dec; 371(1-3):238-51. PubMed ID: 17027064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating shipping emissions in the region of the Sea of Marmara, Turkey.
Deniz C; Durmuşoğlu Y
Sci Total Environ; 2008 Feb; 390(1):255-61. PubMed ID: 17976688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. International trade and air pollution: estimating the economic costs of air emissions from waterborne commerce vessels in the United States.
Gallagher KP
J Environ Manage; 2005 Oct; 77(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15992989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
