These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28480818)

  • 1. Why We Really Need to Do Fewer Statistical Tests.
    Brenner E
    Perception; 2017 Oct; 46(10):1129-1132. PubMed ID: 28480818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Metastudies for robust tests of theory.
    Baribault B; Donkin C; Little DR; Trueblood JS; Oravecz Z; van Ravenzwaaij D; White CN; De Boeck P; Vandekerckhove J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(11):2607-2612. PubMed ID: 29531092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Different tests for a difference: how do we do research?
    Drummond GB; Vowler SL
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2012 Feb; 39(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 22288489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From Bayes through marginal utility to effect sizes: a guide to understanding the clinical and statistical significance of the results of autism research findings.
    Cicchetti DV; Koenig K; Klin A; Volkmar FR; Paul R; Sparrow S
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2011 Feb; 41(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 20490646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why hypothesis tests are essential for psychological science: a comment on Cumming (2014).
    Morey RD; Rouder JN; Verhagen J; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jun; 25(6):1289-90. PubMed ID: 24604147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Problem with p values: why p values do not tell you if your treatment is likely to work.
    Price R; Bethune R; Massey L
    Postgrad Med J; 2020 Jan; 96(1131):1-3. PubMed ID: 31662411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian Approaches to Statistical Inferences.
    Turner DP; Deng H; Houle TT
    Headache; 2020 Oct; 60(9):1879-1885. PubMed ID: 32996136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reply to: More erroneous statements about the use of frequentist statistical methods in medical research.
    Livneh A
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2019; 37 Suppl 122(6):5. PubMed ID: 29148416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Bayesian statistics in medicine. Part I: The basic tools].
    Nichelatti M; Montomoli C
    G Ital Nefrol; 2008; 25(3):342-6. PubMed ID: 18473305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [[Evaluation of medical diagnostic tests: application of Bayes theorem, ROC-curve and Kappa-test] ].
    Lugosi L; Molnár I
    Orv Hetil; 2000 Jul; 141(31):1725-8. PubMed ID: 10976197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Editorial: Bayesian benefits for child psychology and psychiatry researchers.
    Oldehinkel AJ
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2016 Sep; 57(9):985-7. PubMed ID: 27535649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Calculating statistical significance].
    Puche RC
    Medicina (B Aires); 2017; 77(4):348. PubMed ID: 28825586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Data presentation and the use of statistical tests in biomedical journals: can we reach a consensus?
    Evans RG; Su DF
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2011 May; 38(5):285-6. PubMed ID: 21388434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Common Statistical Errors and how to Avoid them.
    Gogtay NJ; Thatte UM
    J Assoc Physicians India; 2017 Nov; 65(11):81-84. PubMed ID: 29322716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical analysis plans in observational research.
    Trinh QD; Sun M
    JAMA; 2013 Jan; 309(1):32. PubMed ID: 23280217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical analysis plans in observational research--reply.
    Thomas L; Peterson ED
    JAMA; 2013 Jan; 309(1):32. PubMed ID: 23280218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Twenty statistical errors even you can find in biomedical research articles.
    Lang T
    Croat Med J; 2004 Aug; 45(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 15311405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why clinicians are natural bayesians.
    Gill CJ; Sabin L; Schmid CH
    BMJ; 2005 May; 330(7499):1080-3. PubMed ID: 15879401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation, agreement, and Bland-Altman analysis: statistical analysis of method comparison studies.
    Bunce C
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jul; 148(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 19540984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The value of statistical analysis plans in observational research: defining high-quality research from the start.
    Thomas L; Peterson ED
    JAMA; 2012 Aug; 308(8):773-4. PubMed ID: 22910753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.