These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28480973)

  • 1. Brain activities associated with learning of the Monty Hall Dilemma task.
    Hirao T; Murphy TI; Masaki H
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Sep; 54(9):1359-1369. PubMed ID: 28480973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus-preceding negativity represents a conservative response tendency.
    Hirao T; Murphy TI; Masaki H
    Neuroreport; 2016 Jan; 27(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 26626414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Elevated outcome-anticipation and outcome-evaluation ERPs associated with a greater preference for larger-but-delayed rewards.
    Pornpattananangkul N; Nadig A; Heidinger S; Walden K; Nusslock R
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 17(3):625-641. PubMed ID: 28224457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning how to "make a deal": human (Homo sapiens) and monkey (Macaca mulatta) performance when repeatedly faced with the Monty Hall Dilemma.
    Klein ED; Evans TA; Schultz NB; Beran MJ
    J Comp Psychol; 2013 Feb; 127(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 22746157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Choice behavior of pigeons (Columba livia), college students, and preschool children (Homo sapiens) in the Monty Hall dilemma.
    Mazur JE; Kahlbaugh PE
    J Comp Psychol; 2012 Nov; 126(4):407-20. PubMed ID: 22582816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new version of the Monty Hall Dilemma with unequal probabilities.
    Granberg D
    Behav Processes; 1999 Nov; 48(1-2):25-34. PubMed ID: 24897560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The collider principle in causal reasoning: why the Monty Hall dilemma is so hard.
    Burns BD; Wieth M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):434-49. PubMed ID: 15355148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing the limits of optimality: the effect of base rates in the Monty Hall dilemma.
    Herbranson WT; Wang S
    Learn Behav; 2014 Mar; 42(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 24234041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ERP correlates of valence asymmetry during incentive anticipation.
    Li Q; Xu J; Chen W; Mu Z; An T; Zheng Y
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Nov; 55(11):e13213. PubMed ID: 30069970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why Humans Fail in Solving the Monty Hall Dilemma: A Systematic Review.
    Saenen L; Heyvaert M; Van Dooren W; Schaeken W; Onghena P
    Psychol Belg; 2018 Jun; 58(1):128-158. PubMed ID: 30479812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diminished choice effect on anticipating improbable rewards.
    Chen W; Li Q; Mei S; Yi W; Yang G; Zhou S; Liu X; Zheng Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Mar; 111():45-50. PubMed ID: 29355649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reasoning and choice in the Monty Hall Dilemma (MHD): implications for improving Bayesian reasoning.
    Tubau E; Aguilar-Lleyda D; Johnson ED
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():353. PubMed ID: 25873906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are birds smarter than mathematicians? Pigeons (Columba livia) perform optimally on a version of the Monty Hall Dilemma.
    Herbranson WT; Schroeder J
    J Comp Psychol; 2010 Feb; 124(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 20175592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Affective-motivational influences on feedback-related ERPs in a gambling task.
    Masaki H; Takeuchi S; Gehring WJ; Takasawa N; Yamazaki K
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 16483556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trait anxiety and probabilistic learning: Behavioral and electrophysiological findings.
    Jiang D; Zhang D; Chen Y; He Z; Gao Q; Gu R; Xu P
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Feb; 132():17-26. PubMed ID: 29100909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological correlates of anticipating improbable but desired events.
    Fuentemilla L; Cucurell D; Marco-Pallarés J; Guitart-Masip M; Morís J; Rodríguez-Fornells A
    Neuroimage; 2013 Sep; 78():135-44. PubMed ID: 23583745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulus-preceding negativity is modulated by action-outcome contingency.
    Masaki H; Yamazaki K; Hackley SA
    Neuroreport; 2010 Mar; 21(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 20134356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feedback-related negativity is enhanced in adolescence during a gambling task with and without probabilistic reinforcement learning.
    Martínez-Velázquez ES; Ramos-Loyo J; González-Garrido AA; Sequeira H
    Neuroreport; 2015 Jan; 26(2):45-9. PubMed ID: 25494471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in error tolerance in humans: Neurophysiological evidences.
    Padrao G; Mallorquí A; Cucurell D; Rodriguez-Fornells A
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 15(4):808-21. PubMed ID: 26018781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electroencephalographic Evidence of Abnormal Anticipatory Uncertainty Processing in Gambling Disorder Patients.
    Megías A; Navas JF; Perandrés-Gómez A; Maldonado A; Catena A; Perales JC
    J Gambl Stud; 2018 Jun; 34(2):321-338. PubMed ID: 28447289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.