These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28481027)

  • 21. Multiple Regions of a Cortical Network Commonly Encode the Meaning of Words in Multiple Grammatical Positions of Read Sentences.
    Anderson AJ; Lalor EC; Lin F; Binder JR; Fernandino L; Humphries CJ; Conant LL; Raizada RDS; Grimm S; Wang X
    Cereb Cortex; 2019 Jun; 29(6):2396-2411. PubMed ID: 29771323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predictive Brain Mechanisms in Sound-to-Meaning Mapping during Speech Processing.
    Lyu B; Ge J; Niu Z; Tan LH; Gao JH
    J Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 36(42):10813-10822. PubMed ID: 27798136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Scalar Implicature is Sensitive to Contextual Alternatives.
    Zhang Z; Bergen L; Paunov A; Ryskin R; Gibson E
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Feb; 47(2):e13238. PubMed ID: 36739521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. When three is not some: on the pragmatics of numerals.
    Shetreet E; Chierchia G; Gaab N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Apr; 26(4):854-63. PubMed ID: 24168221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predictions interact with missing sensory evidence in semantic processing areas.
    Scharinger M; Bendixen A; Herrmann B; Henry MJ; Mildner T; Obleser J
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Feb; 37(2):704-16. PubMed ID: 26583355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cross-Linguistic Variation in the Meaning of Quantifiers: Implications for Pragmatic Enrichment.
    Stateva P; Stepanov A; Déprez V; Dupuy LE; Reboul AC
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():957. PubMed ID: 31156492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Scalar implicature is not a default process: An ERP study of the scalar implicature processing under the effect of focus factor.
    Zhao M; Liu X; Dai X; Dong S; Han Z
    Brain Res; 2021 Aug; 1765():147499. PubMed ID: 33894226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Neural processing associated with comprehension of an indirect reply during a scenario reading task.
    Shibata M; Abe J; Itoh H; Shimada K; Umeda S
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Nov; 49(13):3542-50. PubMed ID: 21930137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does the speaker matter? Online processing of semantic and pragmatic information in L2 speech comprehension.
    Foucart A; Garcia X; Ayguasanosa M; Thierry G; Martin C; Costa A
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():291-303. PubMed ID: 26115602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Barking up the right tree: Univariate and multivariate fMRI analyses of homonym comprehension.
    Hoffman P; Tamm A
    Neuroimage; 2020 Oct; 219():117050. PubMed ID: 32534964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Distinction between the literal and intended meanings of sentences: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of metaphor and sarcasm.
    Uchiyama HT; Saito DN; Tanabe HC; Harada T; Seki A; Ohno K; Koeda T; Sadato N
    Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):563-83. PubMed ID: 21333979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Context-dependent semantic processing in the human brain: evidence from idiom comprehension.
    Rommers J; Dijkstra T; Bastiaansen M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 May; 25(5):762-76. PubMed ID: 23249356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Incremental comprehension of spoken quantifier sentences: Evidence from brain potentials.
    Freunberger D; Nieuwland MS
    Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 1646():475-481. PubMed ID: 27346365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Phonological markers of information structure: an fMRI study.
    van Leeuwen TM; Lamers MJ; Petersson KM; Gussenhoven C; Rietveld T; Poser B; Hagoort P
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 May; 58():64-74. PubMed ID: 24726334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evidence for bilateral involvement in idiom comprehension: An fMRI study.
    Zempleni MZ; Haverkort M; Renken R; A Stowe L
    Neuroimage; 2007 Feb; 34(3):1280-91. PubMed ID: 17141528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. It doesn't matter what you say: FMRI correlates of voice learning and recognition independent of speech content.
    Zäske R; Awwad Shiekh Hasan B; Belin P
    Cortex; 2017 Sep; 94():100-112. PubMed ID: 28738288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An Attempt to Conceptually Replicate the Dissociation between Syntax and Semantics during Sentence Comprehension.
    Siegelman M; Blank IA; Mineroff Z; Fedorenko E
    Neuroscience; 2019 Aug; 413():219-229. PubMed ID: 31200104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Semantic meaning and pragmatic interpretation in 5-year-olds: evidence from real-time spoken language comprehension.
    Huang YT; Snedeker J
    Dev Psychol; 2009 Nov; 45(6):1723-39. PubMed ID: 19899927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Neural substrates of irony comprehension: A functional MRI study.
    Shibata M; Toyomura A; Itoh H; Abe J
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1308():114-23. PubMed ID: 19853585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Zhou X; Jiang X; Ye Z; Zhang Y; Lou K; Zhan W
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1551-62. PubMed ID: 20138898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.