341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28481477)
1. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the prepectoral breast reconstruction with Braxon dermal matrix: First multicenter European report on 100 cases.
Vidya R; Masià J; Cawthorn S; Berna G; Bozza F; Gardetto A; Kołacińska A; Dell'Antonia F; Tiengo C; Bassetto F; Caputo GG; Governa M
Breast J; 2017 Nov; 23(6):670-676. PubMed ID: 28481477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a novel breast reconstruction technique using the Braxon
Berna G; Cawthorn SJ; Papaccio G; Balestrieri N
ANZ J Surg; 2017 Jun; 87(6):493-498. PubMed ID: 25266930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical, histological, and ultrasound follow-up of breast reconstruction with one-stage muscle-sparing "wrap" technique: A single-center experience.
Onesti MG; Maruccia M; Di Taranto G; Albano A; Soda G; Ballesio L; Scuderi N
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Nov; 70(11):1527-1536. PubMed ID: 28736191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. One-Step Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Dermal Matrix-Covered Implant Compared to Submuscular Implantation: Functional and Cost Evaluation.
Cattelani L; Polotto S; Arcuri MF; Pedrazzi G; Linguadoca C; Bonati E
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(4):e703-e711. PubMed ID: 29275104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Funnel usefulness in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using periareolar incision with prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with acellular dermal matrix.
Woo J; Seung IH; Hong SE
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Nov; 73(11):2016-2024. PubMed ID: 32921621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prepectoral Revision Breast Reconstruction for Treatment of Implant-Associated Animation Deformity: A Review of 102 Reconstructions.
Gabriel A; Sigalove S; Sigalove NM; Storm-Dickerson TL; Rice J; Pope N; Maxwell GP
Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Apr; 38(5):519-526. PubMed ID: 29365064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Prospective Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Subpectoral and Prepectoral Strattice-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Baker BG; Irri R; MacCallum V; Chattopadhyay R; Murphy J; Harvey JR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 May; 141(5):1077-1084. PubMed ID: 29697602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multicentre study of prepectoral breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix.
Chandarana M; Harries S;
BJS Open; 2020 Feb; 4(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 32011819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evolution of the Surgical Technique for "Breast in a Day" Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Transitioning from Dual-Plane to Prepectoral Implant Placement.
Antony AK; Poirier J; Madrigrano A; Kopkash KA; Robinson EC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jun; 143(6):1547-1556. PubMed ID: 31136464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Focus on technique: one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction.
Salzberg CA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Nov; 130(5 Suppl 2):95S-103S. PubMed ID: 23096993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Guide to Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A New Dimension to Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.
Vidya R; Iqbal FM
Clin Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 17(4):266-271. PubMed ID: 28190760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ADM-assisted prepectoral breast reconstruction and skin reduction mastectomy: Expanding the indications for subcutaneous reconstruction.
Onesti MG; Di Taranto G; Ribuffo D; Scuderi N
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Apr; 73(4):673-680. PubMed ID: 31812442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prepectoral Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix: Do We See a Difference?
Manrique OJ; Huang TC; Martinez-Jorge J; Ciudad P; Forte AJ; Bustos SS; Boughey JC; Jakub JW; Degnim AC; Galan R
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Feb; 145(2):263e-272e. PubMed ID: 31985613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast reconstruction and revision surgery for implant-associated breast deformities using porcine acellular dermal matrix: a multicenter study of 156 cases.
Hille-Betz U; Kniebusch N; Wojcinski S; Henseler H; Heyl V; Ohlinger R; Paepke S; Klapdor R; Krause-Bergmann B
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):1146-52. PubMed ID: 25300607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Indications and Pitfalls of Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction with Braxon
Bojanic C; Lawrence A; Mitrasinovic S; Samaras S; Fopp LJ; Forouhi P; Malata CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Aug; 74(8):1931-1971. PubMed ID: 33972202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Mirhaidari SJ; Azouz V; Wagner DS
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Mar; 84(3):263-270. PubMed ID: 31663934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Safe Alternative to Submuscular Prosthetic Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
Sbitany H; Piper M; Lentz R
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Sep; 140(3):432-443. PubMed ID: 28574950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Muscle-Sparing ADM-Assisted Breast Reconstruction Technique Using Complete Breast Implant Coverage: A Dual-Institute UK-Based Experience.
Vidya R; Cawthorn SJ
Breast Care (Basel); 2017 Sep; 12(4):251-254. PubMed ID: 29070989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Splitting the Difference: Using Synthetic and Biologic Mesh to Decrease Cost in Prepectoral Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction.
Karp NS; Salibian AA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):580-584. PubMed ID: 33620924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
