These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28481560)

  • 1. An examination of changes in behavioral control when stimuli with different associative histories are conditioned in compound.
    Fam J; Westbrook RF; Holmes NM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(3):205-218. PubMed ID: 28481560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A combination of common and individual error terms is not needed to explain associative changes when cues with different training histories are conditioned in compound: A review of Rescorla's compound test procedure.
    Holmes NM; Chan YY; Westbrook RF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):242-256. PubMed ID: 30945928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The loss of latent inhibition across compound conditioning.
    Holmes NM; Harris JA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jul; 35(3):328-39. PubMed ID: 19594279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Rescorla-Wagner model: losses in associative strength in compound conditioned stimuli.
    Kremer EF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1978 Jan; 4(1):22-36. PubMed ID: 621465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of blocking and conditioned inhibition to a CS signaling a decrease in US intensity.
    Wagner AR; Mazur JE; Donegan NH; Pfautz PL
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1980 Oct; 6(4):376-85. PubMed ID: 7430953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanisms underlying retarded emergence of conditioned responding following inhibitory training: evidence for the comparator hypothesis.
    Schachtman TR; Brown AM; Gordon EL; Catterson DA; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1987 Jul; 13(3):310-22. PubMed ID: 3612027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The comparator hypothesis of conditioned response generation: manifest conditioned excitation and inhibition as a function of relative excitatory strengths of CS and conditioning context at the time of testing.
    Kasprow WJ; Schachtman TR; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1987 Oct; 13(4):395-406. PubMed ID: 3668477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blocking but not conditioned inhibition results when an added stimulus is reinforced in compound with multiple pretrained stimuli.
    Schachtman TR; Kasprow WJ; Chee MA; Miller RR
    Am J Psychol; 1985; 98(2):283-95. PubMed ID: 4037148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A theoretical note in interpretation of the "redundancy effect" in associative learning.
    Vogel EH; Wagner AR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2017 Jan; 43(1):119-125. PubMed ID: 27786508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Elemental representations of stimuli in associative learning.
    Harris JA
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Jul; 113(3):584-605. PubMed ID: 16802882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Associative changes in elements and compounds when the other is reinforced.
    Rescorla RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Apr; 25(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 10331923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ecco: An error correcting comparator theory.
    Ghirlanda S
    Behav Processes; 2018 Sep; 154():36-44. PubMed ID: 29524550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrospective revaluation: The phenomenon and its theoretical implications.
    Miller RR; Witnauer JE
    Behav Processes; 2016 Feb; 123():15-25. PubMed ID: 26342855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When more is less: extending training of the blocking association following compound training attenuates the blocking effect.
    Pineño O; Urushihara K; Stout S; Fuss J; Miller RR
    Learn Behav; 2006 Feb; 34(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 16786881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The fate of redundant cues: Further analysis of the redundancy effect.
    Jones PM; Pearce JM
    Learn Behav; 2015 Mar; 43(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 25537840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Responding to a conditioned stimulus depends on the current associative status of other cues present during training of that specific stimulus.
    Miller RR; Barnet RC; Grahame NJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Jul; 18(3):251-64. PubMed ID: 1619393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhancement of responding to A after A+/AX+ training: challenges for a comparator theory of learning.
    Esber GR; Pearce JM; Haselgrove M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Oct; 35(4):485-97. PubMed ID: 19839701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional and error-correcting associative mechanisms in classical conditioning.
    Schmajuk N
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jul; 35(3):407-18. PubMed ID: 19594285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blocking and associability change.
    Jones PM; Haselgrove M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Jul; 39(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 23668185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unequal associative changes when excitors and neutral stimuli are conditioned in compound.
    Rescorla RA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2001 Feb; 54(1):53-68. PubMed ID: 11216301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.