These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28481567)

  • 1. Do pigeons (Columba livia) use information about the absence of food appropriately? A further look into suboptimal choice.
    Fortes I; Machado A; Vasconcelos M
    J Comp Psychol; 2017 Nov; 131(4):277-289. PubMed ID: 28481567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing the boundaries of "paradoxical" predictions: Pigeons do disregard bad news.
    Fortes I; Vasconcelos M; Machado A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(4):336-346. PubMed ID: 27598063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The paradoxical effect of low reward probabilities in suboptimal choice.
    Fortes I; Pinto C; Machado A; Vasconcelos M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(2):180-193. PubMed ID: 29683696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do pigeons (Columba livia) study for a test?
    Roberts WA; Feeney MC; McMillan N; MacPherson K; Musolino E; Petter M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 19364222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The power of nothing: Risk preference in pigeons, but not people, is driven primarily by avoidance of zero outcomes.
    Pisklak JM; Madan CR; Ludvig EA; Spetch ML
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(4):431-445. PubMed ID: 31414880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of outcome delay on suboptimal choice.
    McDevitt MA; Pisklak JM; Spetch M; Dunn R
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():279-285. PubMed ID: 30394293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Suboptimal Choice in Pigeons: Stimulus Value Predicts Choice over Frequencies.
    Smith AP; Bailey AR; Chow JJ; Beckmann JS; Zentall TR
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159336. PubMed ID: 27441394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Midsession reversal task with pigeons: Parallel processing of alternatives explains choices.
    Smith AP; Zentall TR; Kacelnik A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(3):272-279. PubMed ID: 29985044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive flexibility and dual processing in pigeons: Temporal and contextual control of midsession reversal.
    MacDonald H; Roberts WA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(2):149-161. PubMed ID: 29469583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suboptimal choice: A review and quantification of the signal for good news (SiGN) model.
    Dunn RM; Pisklak JM; McDevitt MA; Spetch ML
    Psychol Rev; 2024 Jan; 131(1):58-78. PubMed ID: 36877476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Less information results in better midsession reversal accuracy by pigeons.
    Zentall TR; Andrews DM; Case JP; Peng DN
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(4):422-430. PubMed ID: 31157526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rats engage in suboptimal choice when the delay to food is sufficiently long.
    Cunningham PJ; Shahan TA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jul; 45(3):301-310. PubMed ID: 31070433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Change detection and change blindness in pigeons (Columba livia).
    Herbranson WT; Trinh YT; Xi PM; Arand MP; Barker MS; Pratt TH
    J Comp Psychol; 2014 May; 128(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 24188621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When good news leads to bad choices.
    McDevitt MA; Dunn RM; Spetch ML; Ludvig EA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Jan; 105(1):23-40. PubMed ID: 26781050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do pigeons prefer information in the absence of differential reinforcement?
    Zentall TR; Stagner JP
    Learn Behav; 2012 Dec; 40(4):465-75. PubMed ID: 22367755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When good pigeons make bad decisions: Choice with probabilistic delays and outcomes.
    Pisklak JM; McDevitt MA; Dunn RM; Spetch ML
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Nov; 104(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 26676182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Like chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), pigeons (Columba livia domestica) match and Nash equilibrate where humans (Homo sapiens) do not.
    Hachiga Y; Schwartz LP; Tripoli C; Michaels S; Kearns D; Silberberg A
    J Comp Psychol; 2019 May; 133(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 30372107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Context effects on choice.
    Goldshmidt JN; Lattal KM; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Nov; 70(3):301-20. PubMed ID: 9821681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pigeon's (Columba livia) paradoxical preference for the suboptimal alternative in a complex foraging task.
    Zentall TR; Case JP; Luong J
    J Comp Psychol; 2016 May; 130(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 27064201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An associability decay model of paradoxical choice.
    Daniels CW; Sanabria F
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(3):258-271. PubMed ID: 29985043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.