423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28481581)
1. The psychology of defendant plea decision making.
Redlich AD; Bibas S; Edkins VA; Madon S
Am Psychol; 2017; 72(4):339-352. PubMed ID: 28481581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An offer you cannot refuse: Plea offer size affects innocent but not guilty defendants' perceptions of voluntariness.
Fessinger MB; Kovera MB
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Dec; 47(6):619-633. PubMed ID: 38127547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. From whose perspective? Differences between actors and observers in determining the voluntariness of guilty pleas.
Fessinger MB; Kovera MB
Law Hum Behav; 2022 Oct; 46(5):353-371. PubMed ID: 36227320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. To plead or not to plead: A comparison of juvenile and adult true and false plea decisions.
Redlich AD; Shteynberg RV
Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):611-625. PubMed ID: 27348715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigating predictors of true and false guilty pleas.
Henderson KS; Levett LM
Law Hum Behav; 2018 Oct; 42(5):427-441. PubMed ID: 30047747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Content and comprehensibility of juvenile and adult tender-of-plea forms: implications for knowing, intelligent, and voluntary guilty pleas.
Redlich AD; Bonventre CL
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Apr; 39(2):162-76. PubMed ID: 25528381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Limitations on the Ability to Negotiate Justice: Attorney Perspectives on Guilt, Innocence, and Legal Advice in the Current Plea System.
Helm RK; Reyna VF; Franz AA; Novick RZ; Dincin S; Cort AE
Psychol Crime Law; 2018; 24(9):915-934. PubMed ID: 30745792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Innocence in the shadow of COVID-19: Plea decision making during a pandemic.
Wilford MM; Zimmerman DM; Yan S; Sutherland KT
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Dec; 27(4):739-750. PubMed ID: 34138621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Guilty plea hearings in juvenile and criminal court.
Redlich AD; Domagalski K; Woestehoff SA; Dezember A; Quas JA
Law Hum Behav; 2022 Oct; 46(5):337-352. PubMed ID: 36227319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alford pleas in the age of innocence.
Redlich AD; Ozdoğru AA
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):467-88. PubMed ID: 19405036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. COVID-19 exacerbates existing system factors that disadvantage defendants: Findings from a national survey of defense attorneys.
Daftary-Kapur T; Henderson KS; Zottoli TM
Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):81-96. PubMed ID: 34110871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Guilty pleas of youths and adults: Differences in legal knowledge and decision making.
Zottoli TM; Daftary-Kapur T
Law Hum Behav; 2019 Apr; 43(2):166-179. PubMed ID: 30570279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Legal decisions of preadolescent and adolescent defendants: predictors of confessions, pleas, communication with attorneys, and appeals.
Viljoen JL; Klaver J; Roesch R
Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):253-77. PubMed ID: 15965628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Insanity defense pleas in Baltimore City: an analysis of outcome.
Janofsky JS; Dunn MH; Roskes EJ; Briskin JK; Rudolph MS
Am J Psychiatry; 1996 Nov; 153(11):1464-8. PubMed ID: 8890682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The "Partial Innocence" Effect: False Guilty Pleas to Partially Unethical Behaviors.
Cardenas SA; Sanchez PY; Kassin SM
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Jul; ():1461672231185639. PubMed ID: 37491946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Developing a model of guilty plea decision-making: Fuzzy-trace theory, gist, and categorical boundaries.
Zottoli TM; Helm RK; Edkins VA; Bixter MT
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Jun; 47(3):403-421. PubMed ID: 37326548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The competency of criminal defendants to refuse, for delusional reasons, a viable insanity defense recommended by counsel.
Litwack TR
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(2):135-56. PubMed ID: 12645042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk assessment in sentencing and plea bargaining: The roles of prosecutors and defense attorneys.
Monahan J; Metz A; Garrett BL; Jakubow A
Behav Sci Law; 2020 Jan; 38(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 31797449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity.
Elliott RL; Nelson E; Fitch WL; Scott R; Wolber G; Singh R
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 8148513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ending Disparities and Achieving Justice for Individuals with Mental Disabilities.
Shea SE; Goldman R
Albany Law Rev; 2017; 80(3):1037-101. PubMed ID: 30990588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
