These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28481581)

  • 21. State of the States: A survey of statutory law, regulations and court rules pertaining to guilty pleas across the United States.
    Zottoli TM; Daftary-Kapur T; Edkins VA; Redlich AD; King CM; Dervan LE; Tahan E
    Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jul; 37(4):388-434. PubMed ID: 31134688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Negotiating with parents: Attorney practices in the juvenile plea bargain process.
    Fountain EN; Woolard J
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):112-123. PubMed ID: 34110873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Attitudinal Predictors of Juror Decisions on Gender and Sexual Minority Defendants.
    Ringger CS
    J Homosex; 2021 Oct; 68(12):2047-2074. PubMed ID: 32069192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Beyond Dusky and Godinez: competency before and after trial.
    Perlin ML
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(3):297-310. PubMed ID: 12808692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Likelihood of Early Guilty Pleas Following Digitally Recorded Victim Statements for Family Violence.
    Walton D; Ellwood R; Martin S
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 Nov; 37(21-22):NP20724-NP20743. PubMed ID: 34825615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Juror decision making in not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder trials: Effects of defendant gender and mental illness type.
    Mossière A; Maeder EM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 49(Pt A):47-54. PubMed ID: 27237958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The world is not fair: an examination of innocent and guilty suspects' waiver decisions.
    Scherr KC; Franks AS
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Apr; 39(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 25602182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interrogations, confessions, and guilty pleas among serious adolescent offenders.
    Malloy LC; Shulman EP; Cauffman E
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Apr; 38(2):181-93. PubMed ID: 24127891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of posttraumatic stress disorder to support an insanity defense.
    Appelbaum PS; Jick RZ; Grisso T; Givelber D; Silver E; Steadman HJ
    Am J Psychiatry; 1993 Feb; 150(2):229-34. PubMed ID: 8422072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attorneys' experiences, perceptions, and plea recommendations in child sexual abuse cases.
    Fessinger MB; McAuliff BD; Aronson E; McWilliams K
    Law Hum Behav; 2024 Feb; 48(1):13-32. PubMed ID: 38573702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The paradox of conviction probability: Mock defendants want better deals as risk of conviction increases.
    Bartlett JM; Zottoli TM
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Feb; 45(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 33734748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Use of Victim Video Statements in Family Violence Cases Increases the Rate of Early Guilty Pleas.
    Walton D; Brooks R; Li J
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 Jul; 36(13-14):6098-6116. PubMed ID: 30541371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Involuntary competence.
    Morse SJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(3):311-28. PubMed ID: 12808693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Salience of Guilty Knowledge Test items affects accuracy in realistic mock crimes.
    Jokinen A; Santtila P; Ravaja N; Puttonen S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):175-84. PubMed ID: 16766070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of forensic evidence on criminal justice case processing.
    Peterson JL; Hickman MJ; Strom KJ; Johnson DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jan; 58 Suppl 1():S78-90. PubMed ID: 23106604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The trial tax and the intersection of race/ethnicity, gender, and age in criminal court sentencing.
    Lehmann PS
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):201-216. PubMed ID: 36931858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Investigating Miranda waiver decisions: An examination of the rational consequences.
    Blackwood HL; Rogers R; Steadham JA; Fiduccia CE
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():11-8. PubMed ID: 26386618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The MacArthur Adjudicative Competence Study: a comparison of criteria for assessing the competence of criminal defendants.
    Bonnie RJ; Hoge SK; Monahan J; Poythress N; Eisenberg M; Feucht-Haviar T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(3):249-59. PubMed ID: 9323652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cumulative Disadvantage: A Psychological Framework for Understanding How Innocence Can Lead to Confession, Wrongful Conviction, and Beyond.
    Scherr KC; Redlich AD; Kassin SM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 Mar; 15(2):353-383. PubMed ID: 32027576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.