These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28481750)

  • 1. Lab-based validation of different data processing methods for wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometers in young adults.
    Ellingson LD; Hibbing PR; Kim Y; Frey-Law LA; Saint-Maurice PF; Welk GJ
    Physiol Meas; 2017 Jun; 38(6):1045-1060. PubMed ID: 28481750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study.
    Sjöberg V; Westergren J; Monnier A; Lo Martire R; Hagströmer M; Äng BO; Vixner L
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e24806. PubMed ID: 33433391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Criterion Validity of Competing Accelerometry-Based Activity Monitoring Devices.
    Kim Y; Welk GJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Nov; 47(11):2456-63. PubMed ID: 25910051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A random forest classifier for the prediction of energy expenditure and type of physical activity from wrist and hip accelerometers.
    Ellis K; Kerr J; Godbole S; Lanckriet G; Wing D; Marshall S
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2191-203. PubMed ID: 25340969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity of an Integrative Method for Processing Physical Activity Data.
    Ellingson LD; Schwabacher IJ; Kim Y; Welk GJ; Cook DB
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Aug; 48(8):1629-38. PubMed ID: 27015380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of linear and non-linear models for predicting energy expenditure from raw accelerometer data.
    Montoye AHK; Begum M; Henning Z; Pfeiffer KA
    Physiol Meas; 2017 Feb; 38(2):343-357. PubMed ID: 28107205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Calibration of wrist-worn ActiWatch 2 and ActiGraph wGT3X for assessment of physical activity in young adults.
    Lee P; Tse CY
    Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():141-149. PubMed ID: 30476691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults.
    Montoye AHK; Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Nelson MB; Bock JM; Imboden MT; Kaminsky LA
    J Sports Sci; 2020 Nov; 38(22):2569-2578. PubMed ID: 32677510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The backwards comparability of wrist worn GENEActiv and waist worn ActiGraph accelerometer estimates of sedentary time in children.
    Boddy LM; Noonan RJ; Rowlands AV; Hurter L; Knowles ZR; Fairclough SJ
    J Sci Med Sport; 2019 Jul; 22(7):814-820. PubMed ID: 30803818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Personalised Accelerometer Cut-point Prediction for Older Adults' Movement Behaviours using a Machine Learning approach.
    Nnamoko N; Cabrera-Diego LA; Campbell D; Sanders G; Fairclough SJ; Korkontzelos I
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Sep; 208():106165. PubMed ID: 34118492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Consumer and Research Monitors under Semistructured Settings.
    Bai Y; Welk GJ; Nam YH; Lee JA; Lee JM; Kim Y; Meier NF; Dixon PM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Jan; 48(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 26154336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adapted Sojourn Models to Estimate Activity Intensity in Youth: A Suite of Tools.
    Hibbing PR; Ellingson LD; Dixon PM; Welk GJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Apr; 50(4):846-854. PubMed ID: 29135657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Field evaluation of a random forest activity classifier for wrist-worn accelerometer data.
    Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Gomersall SR; Clark B; Trost SG
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jan; 20(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 27372275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Wrist Accelerometer Cut-Points for Classifying Physical Activity Intensity in Youth.
    Trost SG; Brookes DSK; Ahmadi MN
    Front Digit Health; 2022; 4():884307. PubMed ID: 35585912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wrist-Worn Accelerometer-Brand Independent Posture Classification.
    Rowlands AV; Yates T; Olds TS; Davies M; Khunti K; Edwardson CL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Apr; 48(4):748-54. PubMed ID: 26559451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of inclinometer functions of the activPAL and ActiGraph GT3X+: A focus on physical activity.
    An HS; Kim Y; Lee JM
    Gait Posture; 2017 Jan; 51():174-180. PubMed ID: 27780084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure.
    Imboden MT; Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Montoye AH
    Br J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 52(13):844-850. PubMed ID: 28483930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults.
    Chu AH; Ng SH; Paknezhad M; Gauterin A; Koh D; Brown MS; Müller-Riemenschneider F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172535. PubMed ID: 28234953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cross-validation and out-of-sample testing of physical activity intensity predictions with a wrist-worn accelerometer.
    Montoye AHK; Westgate BS; Fonley MR; Pfeiffer KA
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2018 May; 124(5):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 29369742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of raw acceleration sedentary thresholds in children and adults.
    Hildebrand M; Hansen BH; van Hees VT; Ekelund U
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2017 Dec; 27(12):1814-1823. PubMed ID: 27878845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.