136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28481805)
1. Interreader Reliability and Clinical Validity of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Grading System for Cervical Foraminal Stenosis.
Lee JE; Park HJ; Lee SY; Lee YT; Kim YB; Lee KH; Shin H; Kwon YJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017; 41(6):926-930. PubMed ID: 28481805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The clinical correlation of a new practical MRI method for grading cervical neural foraminal stenosis based on oblique sagittal images.
Park HJ; Kim SS; Han CH; Lee SY; Chung EC; Kim MS; Kwon HJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):412-7. PubMed ID: 25055278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two MR grading systems for correlation between grade of cervical neural foraminal stenosis and clinical manifestations.
Lee KH; Park HJ; Lee SY; Chung EC; Rho MH; Shin H; Kwon YJ
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150971. PubMed ID: 27007709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inter-observer reliability and clinical validity of the MRI grading system for cervical central stenosis based on sagittal T2-weighted image.
Lee KH; Park HJ; Lee SY; Kim MS; Lee YT; Kim YB; Kim JN; Youn I
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Jun; 127():108987. PubMed ID: 32298959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A practical MRI grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis based on oblique sagittal images.
Park HJ; Kim SS; Lee SY; Park NH; Chung EC; Rho MH; Kwon HJ; Kook SH
Br J Radiol; 2013 May; 86(1025):20120515. PubMed ID: 23410800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of MRI grading for cervical neural foraminal stenosis based on axial and oblique sagittal images: Concordance and reliability study.
Kim W; Ahn KS; Kang CH; Kang WY; Yang KS
Clin Imaging; 2017; 43():165-169. PubMed ID: 28334616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical correlation of a new practical MRI method for assessing cervical spinal canal compression.
Park HJ; Kim SS; Chung EC; Lee SY; Park NH; Rho MH; Choi SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):W197-201. PubMed ID: 22826421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical correlation of a new and practical magnetic resonance grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis assessment.
Park HJ; Kim JH; Lee JW; Lee SY; Chung EC; Rho MH; Moon JW
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jun; 56(6):727-32. PubMed ID: 25009277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A New MRI Grading System for Cervical Foraminal Stenosis Based on Axial T2-Weighted Images.
Kim S; Lee JW; Chai JW; Yoo HJ; Kang Y; Seo J; Ahn JM; Kang HS
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(6):1294-302. PubMed ID: 26576119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis.
Lee S; Lee JW; Yeom JS; Kim KJ; Kim HJ; Chung SK; Kang HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):1095-8. PubMed ID: 20308517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic value of oblique magnetic resonance images for evaluating cervical foraminal stenosis.
Park MS; Moon SH; Lee HM; Kim TH; Oh JK; Lee SY; Oh JB; Riew KD
Spine J; 2015 Apr; 15(4):607-11. PubMed ID: 25452016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Oblique Sagittal Images Prevent Underestimation of the Neuroforaminal Stenosis Grade Caused by Disc Herniation in Cervical Spine MRI.
Kintzelé L; Rehnitz C; Kauczor HU; Weber MA
Rofo; 2018 Oct; 190(10):946-954. PubMed ID: 29874691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of osseous cervical foraminal stenosis in spinal radiculopathy using susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
Engel G; Bender YY; Adams LC; Boker SM; Fahlenkamp UL; Wagner M; Diederichs G; Hamm B; Makowski MR
Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1855-1862. PubMed ID: 30324384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is multidetector computed tomography comparable to magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of lumbar foraminal stenosis?
Kang WY; Ahn JM; Lee JW; Lee E; Bae YJ; Seo J; Kim J; Kang HS
Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 27055917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Accuracy of Zero-Echo Time MRI for the Evaluation of Cervical Neural Foraminal Stenosis.
Argentieri EC; Koff MF; Breighner RE; Endo Y; Shah PH; Sneag DB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Jul; 43(13):928-933. PubMed ID: 29095415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical correlation of a new MR imaging method for assessing lumbar foraminal stenosis.
Park HJ; Kim SS; Lee SY; Park NH; Rho MH; Hong HP; Kwag HJ; Kook SH; Choi SH
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2012 May; 33(5):818-22. PubMed ID: 22241383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of a magnetic resonance imaging-based grading system for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration.
Miyazaki M; Hong SW; Yoon SH; Morishita Y; Wang JC
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):288-92. PubMed ID: 18525490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced MDCT and MRI for identifying the severity and cause of neural foraminal stenosis in cervical radiculopathy: a prospective study.
Douglas-Akinwande AC; Rydberg J; Shah MV; Phillips MD; Caldemeyer KS; Lurito JT; Ying J; Mathews VP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 20028905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of cervical foraminal stenosis: comparison of 3D T2 SPACE with sagittal oblique 2D T2 TSE.
Barnaure I; Galley J; Fritz B; Sutter R
Skeletal Radiol; 2022 Jul; 51(7):1453-1462. PubMed ID: 35006279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New MRI grading system for the cervical canal stenosis.
Kang Y; Lee JW; Koh YH; Hur S; Kim SJ; Chai JW; Kang HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jul; 197(1):W134-40. PubMed ID: 21700974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
