709 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28483930)
1. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure.
Imboden MT; Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Montoye AH
Br J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 52(13):844-850. PubMed ID: 28483930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity of Consumer-Based Physical Activity Monitors for Specific Activity Types.
Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Dickin DC; Montoye AH
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Aug; 48(8):1619-28. PubMed ID: 27015387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.
Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of step count measured by physical activity monitors: The effect of gait speed and anatomical placement site.
Chow JJ; Thom JM; Wewege MA; Ward RE; Parmenter BJ
Gait Posture; 2017 Sep; 57():199-203. PubMed ID: 28666177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study.
Ferguson T; Rowlands AV; Olds T; Maher C
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Mar; 12():42. PubMed ID: 25890168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors.
Lee JM; Kim Y; Welk GJ
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Sep; 46(9):1840-8. PubMed ID: 24777201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of laboratory and daily energy expenditure estimates from consumer multi-sensor physical activity monitors.
Chowdhury EA; Western MJ; Nightingale TE; Peacock OJ; Thompson D
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171720. PubMed ID: 28234979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults.
Chu AH; Ng SH; Paknezhad M; Gauterin A; Koh D; Brown MS; Müller-Riemenschneider F
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172535. PubMed ID: 28234953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Consumer and Research Monitors under Semistructured Settings.
Bai Y; Welk GJ; Nam YH; Lee JA; Lee JM; Kim Y; Meier NF; Dixon PM
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Jan; 48(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 26154336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study.
Sjöberg V; Westergren J; Monnier A; Lo Martire R; Hagströmer M; Äng BO; Vixner L
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e24806. PubMed ID: 33433391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity and Reliability of Fitbit Flex for Step Count, Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity and Activity Energy Expenditure.
Sushames A; Edwards A; Thompson F; McDermott R; Gebel K
PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0161224. PubMed ID: 27589592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity of Activity Trackers in Estimating Energy Expenditure During High-Intensity Functional Training.
Morris CE; Wessel PA; Tinius RA; Schafer MA; Maples JM
Res Q Exerc Sport; 2019 Sep; 90(3):377-384. PubMed ID: 31046630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions.
Dominick GM; Winfree KN; Pohlig RT; Papas MA
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Sep; 4(3):e110. PubMed ID: 27644334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the Fitbit Zip and Fitbit Flex with pregnant women in free-living conditions.
St-Laurent A; Mony MM; Mathieu MÈ; Ruchat SM
J Med Eng Technol; 2018 May; 42(4):259-264. PubMed ID: 30198806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of ActiGraph and Fitbit in the assessment of energy expenditure in Huntington's disease.
Simón-Vicente L; Rodríguez-Fernández A; Rivadeneyra-Posadas J; Soto-Célix M; Raya-González J; Castillo-Alvira D; Calvo S; Mariscal N; García-Bustillo Á; Aguado L; Cubo E
Gait Posture; 2024 Mar; 109():89-94. PubMed ID: 38286064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity Evaluation of the Fitbit Charge2 and the Garmin vivosmart HR+ in Free-Living Environments in an Older Adult Cohort.
Tedesco S; Sica M; Ancillao A; Timmons S; Barton J; O'Flynn B
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Jun; 7(6):e13084. PubMed ID: 31219048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.
Redenius N; Kim Y; Byun W
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):29. PubMed ID: 30732582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of free-living physical activity measurements between ActiGraph GT3X-BT and Fitbit Charge 3 in young people with haemophilia.
Matlary RED; Holme PA; Glosli H; Rueegg CS; Grydeland M
Haemophilia; 2022 Nov; 28(6):e172-e180. PubMed ID: 35830613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Step-count outcomes of 13 different activity trackers: Results from laboratory and free-living experiments.
Nakagata T; Murakami H; Kawakami R; Tripette J; Nakae S; Yamada Y; Ishikawa-Takata K; Tanaka S; Miyachi M
Gait Posture; 2022 Oct; 98():24-33. PubMed ID: 36030707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the Fitbit One® for physical activity measurement at an upper torso attachment site.
Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Shaffer JA; Ma Y; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE; Davidson KW
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Apr; 9():213. PubMed ID: 27068022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
