120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28484069)
21. Surveillance for colorectal neoplasia: is patient adherence following treatment a problem?
Myers RE; Bralow SP; Goldstein R; Jacobs M; Wolf TA; Engstrom PF
Cancer Detect Prev; 1993; 17(6):609-17. PubMed ID: 8275513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Is barium enema an adequate diagnostic test for the evaluation of patients with positive fecal occult blood?
Ramos C; De Jesús-Caraballo J; Toro DH; Ojeda A; Martínez-Souss J; Dueño MI; Cruz-Correa M
Bol Asoc Med P R; 2009; 101(2):23-8. PubMed ID: 19954097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Diagnostic imaging review.
Vajnar J
JAAPA; 2007 Apr; 20(4):64, 66. PubMed ID: 17484334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A risk index for advanced neoplasia on the second surveillance colonoscopy in patients with previous adenomatous polyps.
Imperiale TF; Juluri R; Sherer EA; Glowinski EA; Johnson CS; Morelli MS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Sep; 80(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 24890416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sex preferences for colonoscopists and GI physicians among patients and health care professionals.
Shah DK; Karasek V; Gerkin RD; Ramirez FC; Young MA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):122-127.e2. PubMed ID: 21704811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Utility of computed tomographic colonography in surveillance for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome.
Renkonen-Sinisalo L; Kivisaari A; Kivisaari L; Sarna S; Järvinen HJ
Fam Cancer; 2007; 6(1):135-40. PubMed ID: 17273816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Patient and clinician preferences for surgical and medical treatment options in ulcerative colitis.
Byrne CM; Tan KK; Young JM; Selby W; Solomon MJ
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Apr; 16(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 24373392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Management of small polyps detected by screening CT colonography: patient and physician preferences.
Shah JP; Hynan LS; Rockey DC
Am J Med; 2009 Jul; 122(7):687.e1-9. PubMed ID: 19559172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. High compliance rates observed for follow up colonoscopy post polypectomy are achievable outside of clinical trials: efficacy of polypectomy is not reduced by low compliance for follow up.
Colquhoun P; Chen HC; Kim JI; Efron J; Weiss EG; Nogueras JJ; Vernava AM; Wexner SD
Colorectal Dis; 2004 May; 6(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 15109378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Health care provider and patient preparedness for alternative colorectal cancer follow-up; a review.
Qaderi SM; Swartjes H; Custers JAE; de Wilt JHW
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Oct; 46(10 Pt A):1779-1788. PubMed ID: 32571636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Long term surveillance of polyps and colorectal cancers].
Van Cauter J; Codden T; Pestiaux A; Henry JP
Rev Med Brux; 2001 Sep; 22(4):A234-7. PubMed ID: 11680180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quality assessment of colonoscopy in Flanders: a voluntary survey among Flemish gastroenterologist.
Macken E; Vannoote J; Moreels T; Peeters M; Wouters K
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2015; 78(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 26118574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The views of gastroenterologists about the role of nurse endoscopists, especially in colorectal cancer screening.
van Putten PG; van Leerdam ME; Kuipers EJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2009 Apr; 29(8):892-7. PubMed ID: 19183151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.
Winawer SJ; Zauber AG; Fletcher RH; Stillman JS; O'Brien MJ; Levin B; Smith RA; Lieberman DA; Burt RW; Levin TR; Bond JH; Brooks D; Byers T; Hyman N; Kirk L; Thorson A; Simmang C; Johnson D; Rex DK; ;
Gastroenterology; 2006 May; 130(6):1872-85. PubMed ID: 16697750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A loss-effectiveness analysis of risk-adapted surveillance after colorectal polypectomy.
Mansmann U
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():395-8. PubMed ID: 11187582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Longitudinal assessment of colonoscopy quality indicators: a report from the Gastroenterology Practice Management Group.
Hernandez LV; Deas TM; Catalano MF; Guda NM; Huang L; Ketover SR; Etzkorn KP; Gutta KG; Morris SJ; Schmalz MJ; Klyve D; Allen JI
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Nov; 80(5):835-41. PubMed ID: 24818549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical practice variation in the management of diminutive colorectal polyps: results of a national survey of gastroenterologists.
Gellad ZF; Voils CI; Lin L; Provenzale D
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jun; 108(6):873-8. PubMed ID: 23735908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Effect of Endoscopist Recommendations on PCPs Choosing Wisely about Colonoscopy.
Read AJ; Weissman A; Schoenfeld PS; Saini S; Menees SB; Saini SD
Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 111(5):749-51. PubMed ID: 27151128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Surveillance of colonic polyps: Are we getting it right?
Bonnington SN; Rutter MD
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Feb; 22(6):1925-34. PubMed ID: 26877600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Most Premature Surveillance Colonoscopy Is Not Attributable to Bowel Preparation or New Clinical Indications.
Desai V; Sussman DA; Greenspan M; Dayanand S; Ollington K; Patel S; Li H; Melson J
Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Sep; 61(9):2496-504. PubMed ID: 27142669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
