253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28484226)
1. Pattern analysis of laser-tattoo interactions for picosecond- and nanosecond-domain 1,064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium-aluminum-garnet lasers in tissue-mimicking phantom.
Ahn KJ; Zheng Z; Kwon TR; Kim BJ; Lee HS; Cho SB
Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):1533. PubMed ID: 28484226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combination of Dual Wavelength Picosecond and Nanosecond Pulse Width Neodymium-Doped Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Lasers for Tattoo Removal.
Kato H; Doi K; Kanayama K; Araki J; Nakatsukasa S; Chi D; Mori M; Fuse Y; Sakae Y; Uozumi T
Lasers Surg Med; 2020 Jul; 52(6):515-522. PubMed ID: 31729066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simulation of laser-tattoo pigment interaction in a tissue-mimicking phantom using Q-switched and long-pulsed lasers.
Ahn KJ; Kim BJ; Cho SB
Skin Res Technol; 2017 Aug; 23(3):376-383. PubMed ID: 27868243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The picosecond laser for tattoo removal.
Hsu VM; Aldahan AS; Mlacker S; Shah VV; Nouri K
Lasers Med Sci; 2016 Nov; 31(8):1733-1737. PubMed ID: 27056705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sequential delivery of long-pulsed 755-nm alexandrite laser and long-pulsed 1,064-nm neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser treatment for pigmented disorders.
Cho SB; Ahn KJ; Oh D; Kim H; Yoo KH
Skin Res Technol; 2019 Sep; 25(5):683-692. PubMed ID: 31056804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of 1064 nm nanosecond, 1064 nm picosecond, 755 nm, and 595 nm lasers for tattoo removal: An essential role by macrophage.
Du XJ; Zhou HM; Wang Z; Liu J; Wang JF; Li D; Wu TT; Chen B; Zeng WH
Lasers Surg Med; 2022 Jul; 54(5):737-746. PubMed ID: 35289435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of responses of tattoos to picosecond and nanosecond Q-switched neodymium: YAG lasers.
Ross V; Naseef G; Lin G; Kelly M; Michaud N; Flotte TJ; Raythen J; Anderson RR
Arch Dermatol; 1998 Feb; 134(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 9487208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Successful Treatment of Cosmetic Eyebrow Tattoos in Fitzpatrick III-IV With Picosecond (1,064, 532-nm) Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser With a Perfluorodecalin-Infused Patch: A Pilot Study.
Moustafa F; Suggs A; Hamill SS; Friedman PM
Lasers Surg Med; 2020 Sep; 52(7):586-589. PubMed ID: 31828826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd:YAG) 1064-nm picosecond laser vs. Nd:YAG 1064-nm nanosecond laser in tattoo removal: a randomized controlled single-blind clinical trial.
Pinto F; Große-Büning S; Karsai S; Weiß C; Bäumler W; Hammes S; Felcht M; Raulin C
Br J Dermatol; 2017 Feb; 176(2):457-464. PubMed ID: 27518129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New and Advanced Picosecond Lasers for Tattoo Removal.
Adatto MA; Amir R; Bhawalkar J; Sierra R; Bankowski R; Rozen D; Dierickx C; Lapidoth M
Curr Probl Dermatol; 2017; 52():113-123. PubMed ID: 28288459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accelerated tattoo removal with acoustic shock wave therapy in conjunction with a picosecond laser.
Vangipuram R; Hamill SS; Friedman PM
Lasers Surg Med; 2018 Sep; 50(9):890-892. PubMed ID: 29938802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Successful Treatment of Cosmetic Oral Mucosal Tattoos Using QS 694-nm Ruby Laser and 755-nm Alexandrite Picosecond Laser.
Feng H; Christman MP; Muzumdar S; Geronemus RG
Lasers Surg Med; 2020 Oct; 52(8):705-707. PubMed ID: 31885087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of picosecond laser on the multi-colored tattoo removal using Hartley guinea pig: A preliminary study.
Choi MS; Seo HS; Kim JG; Choe SJ; Park BC; Kim MH; Hong SP
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203370. PubMed ID: 30188934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Picosecond lasers for tattoo removal: a systematic review.
Reiter O; Atzmony L; Akerman L; Levi A; Kershenovich R; Lapidoth M; Mimouni D
Lasers Med Sci; 2016 Sep; 31(7):1397-405. PubMed ID: 27311768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laser tattoo removal: laser principles and an updated guide for clinicians.
Hernandez L; Mohsin N; Frech FS; Dreyfuss I; Vander Does A; Nouri K
Lasers Med Sci; 2022 Aug; 37(6):2581-2587. PubMed ID: 35604505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laser assisted tattoo removal - state of the art and new developments.
Bäumler W; Weiß KT
Photochem Photobiol Sci; 2019 Feb; 18(2):349-358. PubMed ID: 30452057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of picosecond versus nanosecond Nd:YAG lasers for the removal of cosmetic tattoos in an animal model.
Leu FJ; Huang CL; Wu YS; Wang CC
Lasers Med Sci; 2022 Mar; 37(2):1343-1350. PubMed ID: 34410571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative treatments of a green tattoo ink with Ruby, Nd:YAG nano- and picosecond lasers in normal and array mode.
Cecchetti D; Bauer EM; Guerriero E; Sennato S; Tagliatesta P; Tagliaferri M; Cerri L; Carbone M
Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):3571. PubMed ID: 35246552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Picosecond lasers: the next generation of short-pulsed lasers.
Freedman JR; Kaufman J; Metelitsa AI; Green JB
Semin Cutan Med Surg; 2014 Dec; 33(4):164-8. PubMed ID: 25830248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of two picosecond lasers to a nanosecond laser for treating tattoos: a prospective randomized study on 49 patients.
Lorgeou A; Perrillat Y; Gral N; Lagrange S; Lacour JP; Passeron T
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2018 Feb; 32(2):265-270. PubMed ID: 28758261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
