These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28484380)

  • 1. Perceived Intensity and Discrimination Ability for Lingual Electrotactile Stimulation Depends on Location and Orientation of Electrodes.
    Moritz J; Turk P; Williams JD; Stone-Roy LM
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():186. PubMed ID: 28484380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lingual electrotactile discrimination ability is associated with the presence of specific connective tissue structures (papillae) on the tongue surface.
    Allison TS; Moritz J; Turk P; Stone-Roy LM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0237142. PubMed ID: 32764778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of electrotactile vestibular substitution on rehabilitation of patients with bilateral vestibular loss.
    Barros CG; Bittar RS; Danilov Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jun; 476(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 20398733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrotactile stimulation on the tongue: Intensity perception, discrimination, and cross-modality estimation.
    Lozano CA; Kaczmarek KA; Santello M
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2009 Jun; 26(2):50-63. PubMed ID: 19697262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross-modal plasticity revealed by electrotactile stimulation of the tongue in the congenitally blind.
    Ptito M; Moesgaard SM; Gjedde A; Kupers R
    Brain; 2005 Mar; 128(Pt 3):606-14. PubMed ID: 15634727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal Asynchrony but Not Total Energy Nor Duration Improves the Judgment of Numerosity in Electrotactile Stimulation.
    Nataletti S; Leo F; Seminara L; Trompetto C; Valle M; Dosen S; Brayda L
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2020; 8():555. PubMed ID: 32656190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond visual, aural and haptic movement perception: hMT+ is activated by electrotactile motion stimulation of the tongue in sighted and in congenitally blind individuals.
    Matteau I; Kupers R; Ricciardi E; Pietrini P; Ptito M
    Brain Res Bull; 2010 Jul; 82(5-6):264-70. PubMed ID: 20466041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Palatal Electrotactile Display Outperforms Visual Display in Tongue Motor Learning.
    Jiang B; Kim J; Park H
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2022; 30():529-539. PubMed ID: 35245197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of saccades in tongue electrotactile stimulation for vision substitution applications.
    Chekhchoukh A; Vuillerme N; Payan Y; Glade N
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():3543-6. PubMed ID: 24110494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrotactile feedback outweighs natural feedback in sensory integration during control of grasp force.
    Gholinezhad S; Dosen S; Jakob D
    J Neural Eng; 2021 Sep; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 34416740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The tongue display unit (TDU) for electrotactile spatiotemporal pattern presentation.
    Kaczmarek KA
    Sci Iran D Comput Sci Eng Electr Eng; 2011 Dec; 18(6):1476-1485. PubMed ID: 28748231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-term retention effect of rehabilitation using head position-based electrotactile feedback to the tongue: influence of vestibular loss and old-age.
    Ghulyan-Bedikian V; Paolino M; Paolino F
    Gait Posture; 2013 Sep; 38(4):777-83. PubMed ID: 23623605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Form perception with a 49-point electrotactile stimulus array on the tongue: a technical note.
    Bach-y-Rita P; Kaczmarek KA; Tyler ME; Garcia-Lara J
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Oct; 35(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 10220221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems.
    Kaczmarek KA; Webster JG; Bach-y-Rita P; Tompkins WJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Jan; 38(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 2026426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial localization of electrotactile stimuli on the fingertip in humans.
    Bobich LR; Warren JP; Sweeney JD; Tillery SI; Santello M
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2007 Dec; 24(4):179-88. PubMed ID: 18097991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Receptive field characteristics under electrotactile stimulation of the fingertip.
    Warren JP; Bobich LR; Santello M; Sweeney JD; Tillery SI
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2008 Aug; 16(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 18713678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrotactile Feedback for Handheld Devices with Touch Screen and Simulation of Roughness.
    Altinsoy ME; Merchel S
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2012; 5(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 26963824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Somatosensation Evoked by Cortical Surface Stimulation of the Human Primary Somatosensory Cortex.
    Kirin SC; Yanagisawa T; Oshino S; Edakawa K; Tanaka M; Kishima H; Nishimura Y
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():1019. PubMed ID: 31607854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrical taste thresholds established on the medial tongue using two sizes of electrodes.
    Nicolaescu SA; Wertheimer JM; Barbash SE; Doty RL
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Aug; 115(8):1509-11. PubMed ID: 16094134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety studies with the University of Melbourne multichannel electrotactile speech processor.
    Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Alcántara JI; Blombery PA; Hopkins IJ; Whitford LA; Clark GM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1992; 29(1):35-52. PubMed ID: 1740777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.