These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28484947)

  • 1. Satisfaction in motion: Subsequent search misses are more likely in moving search displays.
    Stothart C; Clement A; Brockmole JR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Feb; 25(1):409-415. PubMed ID: 28484947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.
    Wolfe JM; Aizenman AM; Boettcher SE; Cain MS
    Vision Res; 2016 Feb; 119():50-9. PubMed ID: 26731644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual search asymmetries in motion and optic flow fields.
    Royden CS; Wolfe JM; Klempen N
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Apr; 63(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 11414131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A little bit of history repeating: Splitting up multiple-target visual searches decreases second-target miss errors.
    Cain MS; Biggs AT; Darling EF; Mitroff SR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Jun; 20(2):112-25. PubMed ID: 24708353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cutting through the MADness: Expectations about what a target is doing impact how likely it is to be found in dynamic visual displays.
    Scarince C; Hout MC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2342-2354. PubMed ID: 30362402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-induced attentional blink: a cause of errors in multiple-target search.
    Adamo SH; Cain MS; Mitroff SR
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2569-74. PubMed ID: 24142814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual perception of intentional motion.
    Dittrich WH; Lea SE
    Perception; 1994; 23(3):253-68. PubMed ID: 7971105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Model of Multiple Identity Tracking (MOMIT) 2.0: Resolving the serial vs. parallel controversy in tracking.
    Li J; Oksama L; Hyönä J
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():260-274. PubMed ID: 30384128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Filtering by movement in visual search.
    McLeod P; Driver J; Dienes Z; Crisp J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 1826322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The what-where trade-off in multiple-identity tracking.
    Cohen MA; Pinto Y; Howe PD; Horowitz TS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1422-34. PubMed ID: 21380611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual integration of motion and form information: evidence of parallel-continuous processing.
    von Mühlenen A; Müller HJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):517-31. PubMed ID: 10909242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual search for motion-form conjunctions: is form discriminated within the motion system?
    von Mühlenen A; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):707-18. PubMed ID: 11424656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Motion disrupts dynamic visual search for an orientation change.
    Crowe EM; Howard CJ; Gilchrist ID; Kent C
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Jun; 6(1):47. PubMed ID: 34175977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Targets Need Their Own Personal Space: Effects of Clutter on Multiple-Target Search Accuracy.
    Adamo SH; Cain MS; Mitroff SR
    Perception; 2015; 44(10):1203-14. PubMed ID: 26562889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning in repeated visual search.
    Hout MC; Goldinger SD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1267-82. PubMed ID: 20601709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tracking objects that move where they are headed.
    Jardine NL; Seiffert AE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2168-79. PubMed ID: 21769535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When is search for a static target among dynamic distractors efficient?
    Pinto Y; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16478326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location.
    van Dam WO; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1184-92. PubMed ID: 20718565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual search for moving and stationary items in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Matsuno T; Tomonaga M
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 172(2):219-32. PubMed ID: 16790282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An individual differences approach to multiple-target visual search errors: How search errors relate to different characteristics of attention.
    Adamo SH; Cain MS; Mitroff SR
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():258-265. PubMed ID: 27919677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.