BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

551 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28485649)

  • 1. Loudness and annoyance of disturbing sounds - perception by normal hearing subjects.
    Skagerstrand Å; Köbler S; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):775-783. PubMed ID: 28485649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 19603878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of temporal decay on perception of heavy-weight floor impact sounds.
    Kim JH; Ryu JK; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2730-8. PubMed ID: 24116411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sounds perceived as annoying by hearing-aid users in their daily soundscape.
    Skagerstrand Å; Stenfelt S; Arlinger S; Wikström J
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Apr; 53(4):259-69. PubMed ID: 24495276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Amplification with digital noise reduction and the perception of annoying and aversive sounds.
    Palmer CV; Bentler R; Mueller HG
    Trends Amplif; 2006 Jun; 10(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 16959733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Annoyance and loudness measurements in auditory fatigue and recovery under different sound exposures].
    Donner R; Doppler U; Haider M; Hloch T; Koller M
    Soz Praventivmed; 1980 Jun; 25(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 7415564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of train type on annoyance and acoustic features of the rolling noise.
    Kasess CH; Noll A; Majdak P; Waubke H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1071-81. PubMed ID: 23927107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating roadside noise barriers using an annoyance-reduction criterion.
    Nilsson ME; Andéhn M; Leśna P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3561-7. PubMed ID: 19206785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A feasibility study of predictable and unpredictable surf-like sounds for tinnitus therapy using personal music players.
    Durai M; Kobayashi K; Searchfield GD
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):707-713. PubMed ID: 29806782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining the short term effects of emotion under an Adaptation Level Theory model of tinnitus perception.
    Durai M; O'Keeffe MG; Searchfield GD
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 345():23-29. PubMed ID: 28027920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relation between annoyance and single-number quantities for rating heavy-weight floor impact sound insulation in wooden houses.
    Ryu J; Sato H; Kurakata K; Hiramitsu A; Tanaka M; Hirota T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3047-55. PubMed ID: 21568408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Restoration of loudness summation and differential loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O; Nooraei N; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2557-68. PubMed ID: 23039449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of auditory enhancement on the loudness of masker and target components.
    Wang N; Oxenham AJ
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():150-156. PubMed ID: 26805025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Annoyance from industrial noise: indicators for a wide variety of industrial sources.
    Alayrac M; Marquis-Favre C; Viollon S; Morel J; Le Nost G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1128-39. PubMed ID: 20815449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relation between psychoacoustical factors and annoyance under different noise reduction conditions for railway noise.
    Kasess CH; Maly T; Majdak P; Waubke H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3151. PubMed ID: 28599526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of loudness-level weightings for assessing the annoyance of environmental noise.
    Schomer PD; Suzuki Y; Saito F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2390-7. PubMed ID: 11757929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychoacoustic quantification of mechanical heart valve noise.
    Nielsen T; Nielsen TV; Johansen P; Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan; 14(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 15700442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subjective and objective rating of spectrally different pseudorandom noises--implications for speech masking design.
    Hongisto V; Oliva D; Rekola L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1344-55. PubMed ID: 25786947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combined effect of noise and vibration produced by high-speed trains on annoyance in buildings.
    Lee PJ; Griffin MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2126-35. PubMed ID: 23556582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustical and perceptual assessment of water sounds and their use over road traffic noise.
    Galbrun L; Ali TT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):227-37. PubMed ID: 23297897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.