These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

529 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28485649)

  • 41. Temporal weights in loudness: Investigation of the effects of background noise and sound level.
    Fischenich A; Hots J; Verhey J; Oberfeld D
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0223075. PubMed ID: 31689327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Relationship between loudness growth function and auditory steady-state response in normal-hearing subjects.
    Ménard M; Gallégo S; Berger-Vachon C; Collet L; Thai-Van H
    Hear Res; 2008 Jan; 235(1-2):105-13. PubMed ID: 18093768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Hypersensitivity to sound--questionnaire data, audiometry and classification.
    Anari M; Axelsson A; Eliasson A; Magnusson L
    Scand Audiol; 1999; 28(4):219-30. PubMed ID: 10572967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Growth rate of loudness, annoyance, and noisiness as a function of tone location within the noise spectrum.
    Hellman RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jan; 75(1):209-18. PubMed ID: 6699282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effects of industrial noise of higher spectrum on the workers’ auditory perception abilities.
    Mihailović D; Đurić N; Kovačević I; Mihailović Đ
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Aug; 73(11):1030-7. PubMed ID: 29328642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The objective-subjective assessment of noise: young adults can estimate loudness of events and lifestyle noise.
    Beach EF; Williams W; Gilliver M
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 22380619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Loudness of complex sounds as a function of the standard stimulus and the number of components.
    Florentine M; Buus S; Bonding P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Oct; 64(4):1036-40. PubMed ID: 744827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effects of Different Spectral Shapes and Amplitude Modulation of Broadband Noise on Annoyance Reactions in a Controlled Listening Experiment.
    Schäffer B; Pieren R; Schlittmeier SJ; Brink M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 May; 15(5):. PubMed ID: 29783747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of ear canal occlusion on hearing sensitivity: A loudness experiment.
    Bonnet F; Nélisse H; Voix J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):3574. PubMed ID: 29960431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Annoyance, detection and recognition of wind turbine noise.
    Van Renterghem T; Bockstael A; De Weirt V; Botteldooren D
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Jul; 456-457():333-45. PubMed ID: 23624007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Hearing thresholds of two harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) for playbacks of multiple pile driving strike sounds.
    Kastelein RA; Hoek L; Gransier R; Jennings N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2307-12. PubMed ID: 23967961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of the preliminary auditory profile test battery in an international multi-centre study.
    van Esch TE; Kollmeier B; Vormann M; Lyzenga J; Houtgast T; Hällgren M; Larsby B; Athalye SP; Lutman ME; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):305-21. PubMed ID: 23570289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Hearing thresholds of a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) for playbacks of multiple pile driving strike sounds.
    Kastelein RA; Hoek L; Gransier R; de Jong CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2302-6. PubMed ID: 23967960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Spectro-temporal weighting of loudness.
    Oberfeld D; Heeren W; Rennies J; Verhey J
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e50184. PubMed ID: 23209670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Development and evaluation of the British English coordinate response measure speech-in-noise test as an occupational hearing assessment tool.
    Semeraro HD; Rowan D; van Besouw RM; Allsopp AA
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):749-758. PubMed ID: 28537138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Psychoacoustic correlates of individual noise sensitivity.
    Ellermeier W; Eigenstetter M; Zimmer K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1464-73. PubMed ID: 11325118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Annoyance due to amplitude modulated low-frequency wind farm noise: A laboratory study.
    Zajamsek B; Hansen K; Lechat B; Liebich T; Dunbar C; Micic G; Catcheside P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3410. PubMed ID: 36586880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A logistic prediction model for individual allowable noise levels.
    Furihata K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3544-60. PubMed ID: 19206784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Perceptual constancy in auditory perception of distance to railway tracks.
    De Coensel B; Nilsson ME; Berglund B; Brown AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):474-80. PubMed ID: 23862822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Loudness of subcritical sounds as a function of bandwidth, center frequency, and level.
    Hots J; Rennies J; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 24606270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.