339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28485692)
1. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus zoledronic acid for preventing skeletal-related events in the Czech Republic.
Cristino J; Finek J; Jandova P; Kolek M; Pásztor B; Giannopoulou C; Qian Y; Brezina T; Lothgren M
J Med Econ; 2017 Aug; 20(8):799-812. PubMed ID: 28485692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A cost-effectiveness analysis of denosumab for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with multiple myeloma in the United States of America.
Raje N; Roodman GD; Willenbacher W; Shimizu K; García-Sanz R; Terpos E; Kennedy L; Sabatelli L; Intorcia M; Hechmati G
J Med Econ; 2018 May; 21(5):525-536. PubMed ID: 29480139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Economic evaluation of denosumab compared with zoledronic acid in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients with bone metastases.
Xie J; Namjoshi M; Wu EQ; Parikh K; Diener M; Yu AP; Guo A; Culver KW
J Manag Care Pharm; 2011 Oct; 17(8):621-43. PubMed ID: 21942303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab vs zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with solid tumors and bone metastases in the United States.
Stopeck A; Rader M; Henry D; Danese M; Halperin M; Cong Z; Qian Y; Dansey R; Chung K
J Med Econ; 2012; 15(4):712-23. PubMed ID: 22409231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Snedecor SJ; Carter JA; Kaura S; Botteman MF
J Med Econ; 2013; 16(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 22870908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Monthly Zoledronic Acid, Zoledronic Acid Every 3 Months, and Monthly Denosumab in Women With Breast Cancer and Skeletal Metastases: CALGB 70604 (Alliance).
Shapiro CL; Moriarty JP; Dusetzina S; Himelstein AL; Foster JC; Grubbs SS; Novotny PJ; Borah BJ
J Clin Oncol; 2017 Dec; 35(35):3949-3955. PubMed ID: 29023215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab compared with zoledronic acid in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases.
Xie J; Diener M; Sorg R; Wu EQ; Namjoshi M
Clin Breast Cancer; 2012 Aug; 12(4):247-58. PubMed ID: 22694824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the management of skeletal metastases secondary to breast cancer.
Snedecor SJ; Carter JA; Kaura S; Botteman MF
Clin Ther; 2012 Jun; 34(6):1334-49. PubMed ID: 22578308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with solid tumors and bone metastases in the United States.
Stopeck A; Brufsky A; Kennedy L; Bhatta S; Bhowmik D; Buchanan J; Despiegel N; Hechmati G
J Med Econ; 2020 Jan; 23(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 31364885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Zoledronic acid: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the management of bone metastases.
McKeage K; Plosker GL
Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(3):251-68. PubMed ID: 18282018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cost-effectiveness analysis of denosumab for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with multiple myeloma in four European countries: Austria, Belgium, Greece, and Italy.
Terpos E; Jamotte A; Christodoulopoulou A; Campioni M; Bhowmik D; Kennedy L; Willenbacher W
J Med Econ; 2019 Aug; 22(8):766-776. PubMed ID: 30969797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. TRAPEZE: a randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of chemotherapy with zoledronic acid, strontium-89, or both, in men with bony metastatic castration-refractory prostate cancer.
James N; Pirrie S; Pope A; Barton D; Andronis L; Goranitis I; Collins S; McLaren D; O'Sullivan J; Parker C; Porfiri E; Staffurth J; Stanley A; Wylie J; Beesley S; Birtle A; Brown J; Chakraborti P; Russell M; Billingham L
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Jul; 20(53):1-288. PubMed ID: 27434595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of oral ibandronate versus IV zoledronic acid or IV pamidronate for bone metastases in patients receiving oral hormonal therapy for breast cancer in the United Kingdom.
De Cock E; Hutton J; Canney P; Body JJ; Barrett-Lee P; Neary MP; Lewis G
Clin Ther; 2005 Aug; 27(8):1295-310. PubMed ID: 16199254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in preventing skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases by baseline characteristics.
Lipton A; Fizazi K; Stopeck AT; Henry DH; Smith MR; Shore N; Martin M; Vadhan-Raj S; Brown JE; Richardson GE; Saad F; Yardley DA; Zhou K; Balakumaran A; Braun A
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Jan; 53():75-83. PubMed ID: 26693901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pharmacoeconomics of bisphosphonates for skeletal-related event prevention in metastatic non-breast solid tumours.
Carter JA; Joshi AD; Kaura S; Botteman MF
Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 May; 30(5):373-86. PubMed ID: 22500986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of oral ibandronate compared with intravenous (i.v.) zoledronic acid or i.v. generic pamidronate in breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease undergoing i.v. chemotherapy.
De Cock E; Hutton J; Canney P; Body JJ; Barrett-Lee P; Neary MP; Lewis G
Support Care Cancer; 2005 Dec; 13(12):975-86. PubMed ID: 15871033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost effectiveness of zoledronic acid in the management of skeletal metastases in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients in France, Germany, Portugal, and the Netherlands.
Carter JA; Joshi A; Kaura S; Botteman MF
J Med Econ; 2011; 14(3):288-98. PubMed ID: 21469915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and economic evaluation, of denosumab for the treatment of bone metastases from solid tumours.
Ford J; Cummins E; Sharma P; Elders A; Stewart F; Johnston R; Royle P; Jones R; Mulatero C; Todd R; Mowatt G
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Jul; 17(29):1-386. PubMed ID: 23870108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus oral alendronate for elderly osteoporotic women in Japan.
Mori T; Crandall CJ; Ganz DA
Osteoporos Int; 2017 May; 28(5):1733-1744. PubMed ID: 28210776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of once-yearly injection of zoledronic acid for the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan.
Moriwaki K; Mouri M; Hagino H
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Jun; 28(6):1939-1950. PubMed ID: 28265718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
